CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
6.
DeLeonI.IwataB. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-532.
7.
DelpratoD. J. (2001). Comparisons of discrete-trial and normalized behavioral language intervention for young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 315-325.
8.
FisherW. W.PiazzaC. C.BowmanL. G. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 15-25.
9.
FisherW. W.PiazzaC.BowmanL.HagopianL.OwensJ.SlevinI. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498.
10.
FrimanP. C.PolingA. (1995). Making life easier with effort: Basic findings and applied research on response effort. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 583-590.
11.
HagopianL. P.LongE. S.RushK. S. (2004). Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities. Behavior Modification, 28, 668-677. doi:10.1177/0145445503259836
12.
MacDuffG. S.KrantzP. J.McClannahanL. E. (2001). Prompts and prompt-fading strategies for people with autism. In MauriceC.GreenG.FoxxR. M. (Eds.), Making a difference: Behavioral intervention for autism (pp. 37-50). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
13.
McLayL.MeerL.SchäferM.CouperL.McKenzieE.O’ReillyM.. . .SutherlandD. (2015). Comparing acquisition, generalization, maintenance, and preference across three AAC options in four children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 27, 323-339. doi:10.1007/s10882-014-9417-x
14.
PaceG.IvancicM.EdwardsG.IwataB.PageT. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249-255.
15.
ReichowB. (2012). Overview of meta-analyses on early intensive behavioral intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 42, 512-520. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1218-9
16.
RoaneH.VollmerT.RingdahlJ.MarcusB. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620.
17.
SigafoosJ.O’ReillyM.GanzJ. B.LancioniG. E.SchlosserR. W. (2005). Supporting self-determination in AAC interventions by assessing preference for communication devices. Technology & Disability, 17, 143-153.
18.
SmithT. (2001). Discrete trial training in the treatment of autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 86-92.
19.
SmithT.EikesethS. (2011). O. Ivar Lovaas: Pioneer of applied behavior analysis and intervention for children with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 41, 375-378. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1162-0
20.
StarbleA.HutchinsT.FavroM. A.PrelockP.BitnerB. (2005). Family-centered intervention and satisfaction with AAC device training. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 27, 47-54.
21.
StokesT. F.BaerD. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-367.
22.
TerraceH. S. (1963). Discrimination learning with and without “errors.”Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 223-232.
23.
van der MeerL.KagoharaD.RocheL.SutherlandD.BalandinS.GreenV. A.. . . SigafoosJ. (2013). Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to two children with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 29, 222-234. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.815801
24.
Virués-OrtegaJ. (2010). Applied behavior analytic intervention for autism in early childhood: Meta-analysis, meta-regression and dose–response meta-analysis of multiple outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 387-399. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.008