Restricted accessOtherFirst published online 2018-6
Differentiating Second Language Acquisition From Specific Learning Disability: An Observational Tool Assessing Dual Language Learners’ Pragmatic Competence
AbediJ. (2000). Confounding students’ performance and their language background. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association meeting, New Orleans.
2.
ArtilesA. J.OrtizA. (2002). English language learners with special education needs. Illinois: Center for Applied Linguistics.
3.
ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE. B.TrentS. C.OsherD.OrtizA. (2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968-2008: A critique of underlying views and culture. Exceptional Children, 76, 279-299.
4.
AugustD.HakutaK. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority students: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
BacaL.CervantesH. (2006). The bilingual special education interface. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Merrill, Prentice Hall.
6.
BachmanL. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
BagnatoS. J.McLeanM.MacyM.NeisworthJ. T. (2011). Identifying instructional targets for early childhood via authentic assessment: Alignment of professional standards and practice-based evidence. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 243-253.
8.
BanerjeeR.GuibersonM. (2012). Evaluating young children from culturally diverse backgrounds for special education services. Young Exceptional Children, 15, 33-45.
9.
BentzenW. R. (2009). Seeing young children. Australia: Thompson Delmar Learning.
10.
Blum-KulkaS.SnowC. E. (2004). Introduction: The potential of peer talk. Theme issue, “Peer talk and pragmatic development.”Discourse Studies, 6, 291-306.
11.
BradleyR.DanielsonL.DoolittleJ. (2005). Response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 485-486.
12.
ClayM. M. (2001). An emphasis on prevention. The Journal of Special Education, 11, 183-188.
13.
CollierC. (2010). 7 steps is seven steps for separating difference and disability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
14.
CumminsJ. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
15.
CumminsJ. (2012). The intersection of cognitive and sociocultural factors in the development of reading comprehension among immigrant students. Reading & Writing, 25, 1973-1990.
16.
DörnyeiZ.CsizírK. (2005). The effects of intercultural contact and tourism on language attitudes and language learning motivation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 327-357.
17.
RendonT.Harjusola-WebbS.GatmaitanM. (2014). Standards policies to support young Dual Language Learners. Young Exceptional Children, 17, 21-38.
18.
FarnsworthM. (2012). Who’s coming to my party? Peer talk as a bridge to oral language proficiency. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 43, 253-270.
19.
FigueroaR. (2002). Toward a new model of assessment. In ArtilesA. J.OrtizA. (Eds.), English language learners with special education needs (pp. 51-63). Illinois: Center for Applied Linguistics.
20.
FillmoreL. W. (1979). Individual differences in second language acquisition. Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior, 3, 203-228.
21.
FillmoreL. W. (1991). When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6, 323-346.
GallegoM. A.DuranG. Z.ReyesE. I. (2004). It depends . . . : A socio-historical account of the definition and methods of identification of learning disabilities. Paper presented at the National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems conference on English Language Learners struggling to learn: Emergent research on linguistic differences and Learning Disabilities, Scottsdale, AZ.
25.
GottliebM. (2006). Assessing English Language Learners: Bridges from language proficiency to academic achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
26.
HallidayM. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
HarryB.KlingnerJ. K. (2006). Why are so many minorities in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
HoffE. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26, 55-88.
29.
HuangJ.ClarkeK.MaczarskiE.RabyC. (2011). The assessment of English language learners with learning disabilities: Issues, concerns, and implications. Education, 131, 732-739.
30.
HuangJ.HanT.SchnappK. (2012). Do high-stakes test really address English language learners’ learning needs? A discussion of issues, concerns, and implications. International Journal of Learning and Development, 2(1), 499-508.
31.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, P.L. 102-119, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004)
32.
KlingnerJ.SorrellsA. M.BarreraM. T. (2007). Considerations when implementing Response to Intervention with culturally and linguistically diverse students. In HaagerD.KlingnerJ.VaughnS. (Eds.), Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention (pp. 223-244). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
33.
KlingnerJ. K.HooverJ. J.BacaL. M. (2008). Why do English Language Learners struggle with reading? Distinguishing language acquisition from learning disabilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
34.
KrashenS. (2000). Bilingual education, the acquisition of English, and the retention and loss of Spanish. In RocaA. (Ed.), Research on Spanish in the US: Linguistic issues and challenges (pp. 432-444). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
35.
KyratzisA.Ya-TingT.Bahar KoymenS. (2009). Codes, code-switching, and context: Style and footing in peer group bilingual play. Multilingua, 28, 265-290.
36.
LynchE. W.HansenM. J. (Eds.). (2011). Developing cross-cultural competence: Working with young children and their families (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
37.
McLaughlinB.Gesi BlanchardA.OsanaiY. (1995). Assessing language development in bilingual preschool children. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
38.
NilsenB. (2008). Observation and assessment. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
OrtizA. (1997). Learning disabilities occurring concomitantly with linguistic difference. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 321-332.
41.
OrtizA.YatesJ. (2002). Considerations in the assessment of English language learners referred to special education. In ArtilesA. J.OrtizA. (Eds.), English Language Learners with special education needs (pp. 65-85). Illinois: Center for Applied Linguistics.
42.
OrtizS. (2004). Comprehensive assessment of culturally and linguistically diverse learners: A systematic and practical approach for non-discriminatory assessment. St. John’s University.
43.
PinkerS. (2000). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York, NY: First Perennial Classics.
44.
RendonT.Harjusola-WebbS.GatmaitanM. (2014). Standards policies to support young Dual Language Learners. Young Exceptional Children, 17, 21-38.
45.
RhodesR. L.OchoaS. H.OrtizS. O. (2005). Assessing culturally and linguistically diverse students: A practical guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47.
Roseberry-McGibbinC.BriceA. (2000). Acquiring English as a second language. ASHA Leader, 5(12), 4-7.
48.
SaundersW. M.O’BrienG. (2007). Oral language. In GeneseeF.Lindholm-LearyK.SaundersW. M.ChristianD. (Eds.), Educating English Language Learners: A synthesis of research evidence (pp. 14-63). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49.
ScottA. N.HauerwasL. B.BrownR. D. (2014). State policy and guidance for identifying learning disabilities in culturally and linguistically diverse students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37, 172-185.
50.
Sotelo-DynegaM.OrtizS. O.FlanaganD. P.ChaplinW. F. (2013). English Language proficiency and test performance: An evaluation of bilingual students with the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 781-797.
51.
SparksR. L.PattonJ.GanschowL.HumbachN. (2009). Long-term relationships among early first language skills, second language aptitude, second language affect, and later second language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 725-755.
52.
TaguchiN. (2011). Pragmatic development as a dynamic, complex process: General patterns and case histories. Modern Language Journal, 95, 605-627.
53.
Van CompernolleR. A.KingingerC. (2013). Promoting metapragmatic development through assessment in the zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research, 17, 282-302.
54.
WoodcockR. W.Muñoz-SandovalA. F. (1993). Woodcock-Muñoz Language Survey. Itasca, IL: Riverside.