BashamJ. D.IsraelM.MaynardK. (2010). An ecological model of STEM education: Operationalizing STEM for ALL. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 9-19.
2.
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2011). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author.
3.
ChalufourI.WorthK. (2004). Building structures with young children. St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.
4.
Conn-PowersM.CrossA. F.TraubE. K.Hutter-PishgahiL. (2006). The universal design of early education: Moving forward for all children. Beyond the Journal: Young Children on the Web. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/files/yc/file/200609/ConnPowersBTJ.pdf
5.
CoppleC.BredekampS. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
6.
CoyneP.GanleyP.HallT.MeoG.MurrayE.GordonD. (2006). Applying universal design for learning in the classroom. In RoseD. H.MeyerA. (Eds.), A practical reader in universal design for learning (pp. 1-13). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
7.
DeVriesR.SalesC. (2011). Ramps & pathways: A constructivist approach to physics with young children. Washington, DC: National Association for Education of Young children.
8.
DeVriesR.ZanB.HildebrandtC.EdmiastonR.SalesC. (2002). Developing constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical principles and activities. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.
9.
Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children. (2014, April). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education. Retrieved from http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices
10.
EdsonM. T. (2013). Starting with science: Strategies for introducing young children to inquiry. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
11.
EpsteinA. (2014). The intentional teacher: Choosing the best strategies for young children’s learning. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
12.
HancockT. B.KaiserA. P. (2006). Enhanced milieu teaching. In McCauleyR.FeyM. (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders in children (pp. 203-236). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
13.
MartensM. L. (1999). Productive questions: Tools for supporting constructivist learning. Science & Children, 36(8), 24-27.
14.
McWilliamR. A.BaileyD. B. (1995). Effects of classroom structure and disability on engagement. Topics in Early Childhood Teacher Education, 15, 123-147.
15.
MoomawS.DavisJ. A. (2010). STEM Comes to Preschool. Young Children, 65(5), 12-14.
OdomS. L.McConnellS. R.Chandler,& (1993). Acceptability and feasibility of classroom-based social interaction interventions for young children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 60, 226-236.
18.
ReszkaS. S.OdomS. L.HumeK. A. (2012). Ecological features of preschools and the social engagement of children with autism. Journal of Early Intervention, 34(1), 40-56.
19.
RoseD. H.DolanR. P. (2006). Implications of universal design for learning for classroom assessment. In RoseD. H.MeyerA. (Eds.), A practical reader in universal design for learning (pp. 1-13). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
20.
SpencerE. J.GoldsteinH.KaminskiR. (2012). Teaching vocabulary in storybooks: Embedding explicit vocabulary instruction for young children. Young Exceptional Children, 15(1), 18-32. doi:10.1177/10962506 11435367
21.
StollJ.HamiltonA.OxleyE.EastmanA. M.BrentR. (2012). Young thinkers in motion: Problem solving and physics in preschool. Young Children, 67, 20-26.