Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Initially, many providers viewed the natural environment initiative as a move to close center-based or specialized facilities and as the newest "fad" in service delivery. Training and technical support for this initiative has allowed providers to recognize that natural environments embody philosophical intent essential to a truly family-centered process. This family-centered process never removes the family from their natural environment but rather, works with the family to make their environment more responsive to the child's needs. Service providers are challenged to value the family's typical routine so that they make their supports and services "fit" the family instead of requiring the family [to] "fit" the program (Elder, 1999, ¶6).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ambrose, D. (1987). Managing complex change. Pittsburgh, PA: Enterprise Group.

Bruder, M.B. , & Dunst, C.J. (1999). Expanding learning opportunities for infants and toddlers in natural environments. Zero to Three, 20(3), 34-36.

Dunst, C.J. , Johanson, C. , Trivette, C.M. , & Hambry, D. (1991). Family-oriented early intervention policies and practices: Family-centered or not? Exceptional Children, 58(2), 115-126.

Elder, M. (1999). The Texas collaborative planning process. Retrieved September 16, 2001 from the World Wide Web : www.nectas.unc.edu/inclusion/legis/'FexasECI.asp .

Fenichel, E. (Ed.). (1992). Learning through supervision and mentorship to support the development of infants, toddlers, and their families: A source book. Arlington, VA: Zero to Three/National Center for Clinical Infant Programs.

Gold, S. , Liepack, S. , Scott, M. , & Benjamin-Wise, S. (1999). Creating inclusive classrooms: A report from the field. Young Exceptional Children, 2(2), 2-8.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 (IDEA). Public Law 105-17, 20 United States Code 1400 et seq.

Kalmanson, B. , & Seligman, S. (1992). Family-provider relationships: The basis of all interventions. Infants and Young Children, 4(4), 46-52.

McBride, S.L. (1999). Family-centered practices. Young Children, 54(3), 62-68.

10.

National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System (NEC*TAS) home page. Retrieved September 16, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.nectas.unc.edu.

11.

New Jersey service guideline for early intervention. (1998). Retrieved September 16, 2001 from the World Wide Web : http://www.nectas.unc.edu/inclusion/legis/pdfs/NJvcguide.pdf.

12.

Norman-Murch, T. (Ed.). (1999). Reflective practice in relationship-based organizations Zero to Three, 20(1), 1-35.

13.

Odom, S. , & McLean, M. (Eds.). (1996). Early intervention/early childhood special education: Recommended practice. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

14.

Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) monitoring reports. ( 2001 ). Retrieved September 16, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/OSEP/monrepts/index.html.

15.

Peck, C. (1995). Some further reflections on the difficulties and dilemmas of inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention, 19(3), 197-199.

16.

Smith, B.J. , & Rapport, M.J.K. (1999). IDEA and early childhood inclusion. Denver, CO: Collaborative Planning Project, University of Colorado, Denver.

17.

Villa, R.A. , & Thousand, J.S. (1995). Creating an inclusive school . Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

One Program's Journey

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References