Abstract
Brands increasingly adopt two strategies in tandem: They use artificially intelligent agents, such as service robots, to more efficiently serve customers, and they engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities to positively shape brand-related perceptions and behaviors. In this research, across four studies (including a pilot study, an online interaction with an AI-powered robot, and three preregistered studies, involving real and fictitious brands and intentional and actual behavior) the authors provide evidence for the notion that these two strategies are not necessarily compatible. The authors reveal the counterintuitive and nuanced finding that brands engaging in high-fit CSR suffer more from the introduction of service robots than brands that engage in low-fit CSR. This outcome is explained by a perceived lack of alignment in consumers’ attributions regarding brands’ motivations behind the two strategies, especially regarding the brand's profit-maximization intentions. The authors further identify two managerially actionable moderators. First, a communal service robot strategy can mitigate the negative impact of service robots in instances of high-fit CSR. Second, a more communal CSR implementation (i.e., volunteering time compared with donating money) can lead to a negative impact of service robots when a firm pursues a low-fit CSR strategy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
