Online customer reviews of products and services are essential for facilitating trust and efficient e-commerce. The review system depends crucially on consumers’ voluntary provision of reviews, yet most consumers consult others’ reviews while few consumers post their own reviews. The current research (1) empirically assessed motivations to post and not to post reviews, (2) tested messages inspired from behavioral-intervention theories to encourage online reviewing, and (3) manipulated when the message was presented to online shoppers. Unlike previous findings in other domains, messages that invoked norms or moralization were not successful in motivating online reviewing. Instead, the authors discovered novel message content and interactive presentations that successfully increased review intention. The content addressed motivations assessed in the initial studies and was stated with low threat to avoid reactance. Crucially, the message was presented interactively in real time during shopping instead of after purchase.
AjzenIcek (1991), “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179–211.
2.
BajariPatrickHortaçsuAli (2004), “Economic Insights from Internet Auctions,” Journal of Economic Literature, 42 (2), 457–86.
3.
BeckLisaAjzenIcek (1991), “Predicting Dishonest Actions Using the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Journal of Research in Personality, 25 (3), 285–301.
4.
BoltonGary E.KatokElenaOckenfelsAxel (2004), “How Effective Are Electronic Reputation Mechanisms? An Experimental Investigation,” Management Science, 50 (11), 1587–602.
5.
BrehmJack W. (1966), A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press.
6.
Brown-KruseJamieHummelsDavid (1993), “Gender Effects in Laboratory Public Goods Contribution: Do Individuals Put Their Money Where Their Mouth Is?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 22 (3), 255–67.
7.
BryanChristopher J.AdamsGabrielle S.MoninBenoît (2013), “When Cheating Would Make You a Cheater: Implicating the Self Prevents Unethical Behavior,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142 (4), 1001–05.
8.
BryanChristopher J.WaltonGregory M.RogersToddDweckCarol S. (2011), “Motivating Voter Turnout by Invoking the Self,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (31), 12653–56.
9.
BurtchGordonHongYiliBapnaRaviGriskeviciusVladas (2018), “Stimulating Online Reviews by Combining Financial Incentives and Social Norms,” Management Science, 64 (5), 2065–82.
10.
CabralLuisLiLingfang (2015), “A Dollar for Your Thoughts: Feedback-Conditional Rebates on eBay,” Management Science, 61 (9), 2052–63.
11.
CalderBobby J.TyboutAlice M. (2016), “What Makes a Good Theory Practical?” AMS Review, 6, 116–24.
12.
CheungChristy M.K.LeeMatthew K.O. (2012), “What Drives Consumers to Spread Electronic Word of Mouth in Online Consumer-Opinion Platforms,” Decision Support Systems, 53 (1), 218–25.
13.
CialdiniRobert B.KallgrenCarl A.RenoRaymond R. (1991), “A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 24. Academic Press, 201–34.
14.
ColicevAnatoliKumarAshishO’ConnorPeter (2019), “Modeling the Relationship Between Firm and User Generated Content and the Stages of the Marketing Funnel,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36 (1), 100–116.
15.
ConnerMarkArmitageChristopher J. (1998), “Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28 (15), 1429–64.
16.
De HaanEvertWieselThorstenPauwelsKoen (2016), “The Effectiveness of Different Forms of Online Advertising for Purchase Conversion in a Multiple-Channel Attribution Framework,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33 (3), 491–507.
17.
DellarocasChrysanthos (2003), “The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms,” Management Science, 49 (10), 1407–24.
18.
DellarocasChrysanthosNarayanRitu (2006), “A Statistical Measure of a Population’s Propensity to Engage in Post-Purchase Online Word-of-Mouth,” Statistical Science, 21 (2), 277–85.
DiekmannAndreasJannBenPrzepiorkaWojtekWehrliStefan (2014), “Reputation Formation and the Evolution of Cooperation in Anonymous Online Markets,” American Sociological Review, 79 (1), 65–85.
21.
DillardJames PriceShenLijiang (2005), “On the Nature of Reactance and Its Role in Persuasive Health Communication,” Communication Monographs, 72 (2), 144–68.
22.
Ehrhardt-MartinezKarenDonnellyKat A.LaitnerSkip (2010), “Advanced Metering Initiatives and Residential Feedback Programs: A Meta-Review for Household Electricity-Saving Opportunities,” Report No. E105, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (June).
23.
ElwaldaAbdulazizLuKevin (2016), “The Impact of Online Customer Reviews (OCRs) on Customers’ Purchase Decisions: An Exploration of the Main Dimensions of OCRs,” Journal of Customer Behaviour, 15 (2), 123–52.
24.
FujimotoHiroakiParkEun-Soo (2010), “Framing Effects and Gender Differences in Voluntary Public Goods Provision Experiments,” Journal of Socio-Economics, 39 (4), 455–57.
25.
GneezyUriRustichiniAldo (2000), “Pay Enough or Don’t Pay at All,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3), 791–810.
26.
GodesDavidSilvaJosé C. (2012), “Sequential and Temporal Dynamics of Online Opinion,” Marketing Science, 31 (3), 448–73.
27.
GrayKurtScheinChelseaWardAdrian F. (2014), “The Myth of Harmless Wrongs in Moral Cognition: Automatic Dyadic Completion from Sin to Suffering,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143 (4), 1600–1615.
28.
GrégoireYanyLauferDanielTrippThomas M. (2010), “A Comprehensive Model of Customer Direct and Indirect Revenge: Understanding the Effects of Perceived Greed and Customer Power,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 738–58.
29.
HainesRussellStreetMarc D.HainesDouglas (2008), “The Influence of Perceived Importance of an Ethical Issue on Moral Judgment, Moral Obligation, and Moral Intent,” Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 387–99.
30.
Hennig-ThurauThorstenGwinnerKevin P.WalshGianfrancoGremlerDwayne D. (2004), “Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18 (1), 38–52.
31.
HoudeSébastienToddAnnikaSudarshanAnantFloraJune A.ArmelK. Carrie (2013), “Real-Time Feedback and Electricity Consumption: A Field Experiment Assessing the Potential for Savings and Persistence,” Energy Journal, 34 (1), 87–102.
32.
KenneyMartinZysmanJohn (2016), “The Rise of the Platform Economy,” Issues in Science and Technology, 32 (3), 61.
33.
KimOliverWalkerMark (1984), “The Free Rider Problem: Experimental Evidence,” Public Choice, 43 (1), 3–24.
34.
KoukovaNevena T.WangRebecca Jen-HuiIsaacMathew S. (2023), “‘If You Loved Our Product’: Do Conditional Review Requests Harm Retailer Loyalty?” Journal of Retailing, 99 (1), 85–101.
35.
KruschkeJohn K. (2021), “Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines,” Nature Human Behaviour, 5 (10), 1282–91.
36.
LiddellTorrin M.KruschkeJohn K. (2018), “Analyzing Ordinal Data with Metric Models: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 328–48.
37.
LynhamJohnNittaKoheiSaijoTatsuyoshiTaruiNori (2016), “Why Does Real-Time Information Reduce Energy Consumption?” Energy Economics, 54, 173–81.
38.
MazarNinaAmirOnArielyDan (2008), “The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (6), 633–44.
39.
MessickDavid M.BrewerMarilynn B. (1983), “Solving Social Dilemmas: A Review,” in Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 4, WheelerL.ShaverP., eds. Sage, 11–44.
40.
MetzgerAaronSmetanaJudith G. (2009), “Adolescent Civic and Political Engagement: Associations Between Domain-Specific Judgments and Behavior,” Child Development, 80 (2), 433–41.
41.
MillerDale T.MoninBenoît (2016), “Moral Opportunities Versus Moral Tests,” in The Social Psychology of Morality, ForgasJoseph P.JussimLeeVan LangePaul A.M., eds. Routledge, 40–55.
42.
MoninBenoîtJordanAlexander H. (2009), “The Dynamic Moral Self: A Social Psychological Perspective,” in Personality, Identity, and Character: Explorations in Moral Psychology, NarvaezDarciaLapsleyDaniel K., eds. Cambridge University Press, 341–54.
43.
MulderLaetitia B.Van DijkEricDe CremerDavidWilkeHenk A.M. (2006), “Undermining Trust and Cooperation: The Paradox of Sanctioning Systems in Social Dilemmas,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42 (2), 147–62.
44.
ParksCraig D.JoiremanJeffVan LangePaul A.M. (2013), “Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14 (3), 119–65.
45.
PennebakerJames W.BoydRyan L.JordanKaylaBlackburnKate (2015), “The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015,” University of Texas at Austin.
46.
PetersenJ. AndrewKumarV.PoloYolandaSeseF. Javier (2018), “Unlocking the Power of Marketing: Understanding the Links Between Customer Mindset Metrics, Behavior, and Profitability,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 813–36.
47.
ProserpioDavideZervasGeorgios (2017), “Online Reputation Management: Estimating the Impact of Management Responses on Consumer Reviews,” Marketing Science, 36 (5), 645–65.
48.
ReimerThomasBenkensteinMartin (2018), “Not Just for the Recommender: How eWOM Incentives Influence the Recommendation Audience,” Journal of Business Research, 86, 11–21.
49.
ResnickPaulKuwabaraKoZeckhauserRichardFriedmanEric (2000), “Reputation Systems,” Communications of the ACM, 43 (12), 45–48.
50.
SabucedoJosé-ManuelDonoMarcosAlzateMónicaSeoaneGloria (2018), “The Importance of Protesters’ Morals: Moral Obligation as a Key Variable to Understand Collective Action,” Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 418.
51.
ScheinChelseaGrayKurt (2016), “Moralization and Harmification: The Dyadic Loop Explains How the Innocuous Becomes Harmful and Wrong,” Psychological Inquiry, 27 (1), 62–65.
52.
SchoenmuellerVerenaNetzerOdedStahlFlorian (2020), “The Polarity of Online Reviews: Prevalence, Drivers and Implications,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (5), 853–77.
SparkmanGreggWaltonGregory M. (2017), “Dynamic Norms Promote Sustainable Behavior, Even If It Is Counternormative,” Psychological Science, 28 (11), 1663–74.
55.
SparksBeverley A.BrowningVictoria (2010), “Complaining in Cyberspace: The Motives and Forms of Hotel Guests’ Complaints Online,” Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19 (7), 797–818.
56.
SundaramDinesh S.MitraKaushikWebsterCynthia (1998), “Word-of-Mouth Communications: A Motivational Analysis,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25, AlbaJoseph W.HutchinsonJ. Wesley, eds. Association for Consumer Research, 527–31.
57.
Van BavelJay J.PackerDominic J.HaasIngrid JohnsenCunninghamWilliam A. (2012), “The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral Versus non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions,” PloS One, 7 (11), e48693.
58.
Van LangePaul A.M.JoiremanJeffParksCraig D.Van DijkEric (2013), “The Psychology of Social Dilemmas: A Review,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120 (2), 125–41.
59.
VerhagenTibertNautaAnniekFeldbergFrans (2013), “Negative Online Word-of-Mouth: Behavioral Indicator or Emotional Release?” Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (4), 1430–40.
60.
VilasXianaSabucedoJosé-Manuel (2012), “Moral Obligation: A Forgotten Dimension in the Analysis of Collective Action,” Revista de Psicología Social, 27 (3), 369–75.
61.
WardJames C.OstromAmy L. (2006), “Complaining to the Masses: The Role of Protest Framing in Customer-Created Complaint Web Sites,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (2), 220–30.
62.
WuFangHubermanBernardo A. (2008), “How Public Opinion Forms,” in Internet and Network Economics, PapadimitriouChristosZhangShuzhong, eds. Springer, 334–41.
63.
YangSeungjooKruschkeJohn K. (2024), “Reactance to Persuasive Messages Depends on Felt Obligation,” unpublished manuscript.
64.
ZhangYanWildemuthBarbara M. (2017), “Qualitative Analysis of Content,” in Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, 2nd ed., WildemuthBarbara M., ed. ABC-CLIO, 318–29.
