Consumers often purchase new products based on online reviews and recommendations from both friends and strangers. Previous studies have extensively explored the effects of word of mouth (WOM) on the prepurchase stage, but little is known about whether WOM from friends or strangers can alter consumers’ postpurchase behavior. The authors propose that positive WOM from distant (vs. close) others increases consumers’ intention to share negative WOM when the product/service fails to perform to their satisfaction due to two distinctive motivations. First, consumers perceive that positive WOM from distant others might mislead more people, and, consequently, consumers expect their negative WOM to have a greater impact on helping others. Second, when receiving positive WOM from close others, they are less willing to publicly contradict the close others’ WOM even though they believe the WOM is misleading. Studies 1a and 1b demonstrate the main effect of interpersonal closeness on negative WOM intention, while Study 2 reveals the dual mediating effects of anticipated impact and relationship norm. Studies 3 and 4 validate these mechanisms by showing the moderating role of the self-construal level while ruling out the role of impression management. This research offers practical implications for WOM management across different social ties.
AggarwalPankaj (2004), “The Effects of Brand Relationship Norms on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 87–101.
2.
AhluwaliaRohini (2002), “How Prevalent Is the Negativity Effect in Consumer Environments?” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (2), 270–79.
3.
AralSinan (2011), “Identifying Social Influence: A Comment on Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion,” Marketing Science, 30 (2), 217–23.
4.
AralSinanWalkerDylan (2011), “Creating Social Contagion Through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks,” Management Science, 57 (9), 1623–39.
5.
ArndtJohan (1967), “Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product,” Journal of Marketing Research, 4 (3), 291–95.
6.
AronArthurAronElaine N.SmollanDanny (1992), “Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the Structure of Interpersonal Closeness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (4), 596–612.
7.
AronArthurAronElaine N.TudorMichaelNelsonGreg (1991), “Close Relationships as Including Other in the Self,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (2), 241–53.
8.
AxelrodRobert (1986), “An Evolutionary Approach to Norms,” American Political Science Review, 80 (4), 1095–111.
9.
BagozziRichard P.DholakiaUtpal M. (2002), “Intentional Social Action in Virtual Communities,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16 (2), 2–21.
10.
BakerAndrew M.DonthuNaveenKumarV. (2016), “Investigating How Word-of-Mouth Conversations About Brands Influence Purchase and Retransmission Intentions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (2), 225–39.
11.
BartschatMariaCziehsoGerritHennig-ThurauThorsten (2022), “Searching for Word of Mouth in the Digital Age: Determinants of Consumers’ Uses of Face-to-Face Information, Internet Opinion Sites, and Social Media,” Journal of Business Research, 141, 393–409.
BatsonC. DanielChangJoheeOrrRyanRowlandJennifer (2002), “Empathy, Attitudes, and Action: Can Feeling for a Member of a Stigmatized Group Motivate One to Help the Group?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28 (12), 1656–66.
15.
BeaudryAnnePinsonneaultAlain (2010), “The Other Side of Acceptance: Studying the Direct and Indirect Effects of Emotions on Information Technology Use,” MIS Quarterly, 34 (4), 689–710.
16.
BergerJonah (2014), “Word of Mouth and Interpersonal Communication: A Review and Directions for Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 586–607.
17.
BhattacharjeeAmitMogilnerCassie (2013), “Happiness from Ordinary and Extraordinary Experiences,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (1), 1–17.
18.
BitnerMary Jo (1990), “Evaluating Service Encounters: The Effects of Physical Surroundings and Employee Responses,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 69–82.
19.
BoothbyErica J.SmithLeigh K.ClarkMargaret S.BarghJohn A. (2016), “Psychological Distance Moderates the Amplification of Shared Experience,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42 (10), 1431–44.
20.
BrownJacqueline JohnsonReingenPeter H. (1987), “Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (3), 350–62.
21.
ChakravartyAninditaLiuYongMazumdarTridib (2010), “The Differential Effects of Online Word-of-Mouth and Critics’ Reviews on Pre-Release Movie Evaluation,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24 (3), 185–97.
22.
CheemaAmarKaikatiAndrew M. (2010), “The Effect of Need for Uniqueness on Word of Mouth,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (3), 553–63.
23.
ChenZoey (2017), “Social Acceptance and Word of Mouth: How the Motive to Belong Leads to Divergent WOM with Strangers and Friends,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (3), 613–32.
24.
ChoiHoon S.LeonSteven (2020), “An Empirical Investigation of Online Review Helpfulness: A Big Data Perspective,” Decision Support Systems, 139, 113403.
25.
ChungCindy M.Y.DarkePeter R. (2006), “The Consumer as Advocate: Self-Relevance, Culture, and Word-of-Mouth,” Marketing Letters, 17 (4), 269–79.
26.
ClarkMargaret S. (1984), “Record Keeping in Two Types of Relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (3), 549–57.
27.
ClarkMargaret S.ReisHarry T. (1988), “Interpersonal Processes in Close Relationships,” Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 609–72.
28.
ClarkMargaret S.WaddellBarbara (1985), “Perceptions of Exploitation in Communal and Exchange Relationships,” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2 (4), 403–18.
29.
DellarocasChrysanthosZhangXiaoquanAwadNeveen F. (2007), “Exploring the Value of Online Product Reviews in Forecasting Sales: The Case of Motion Pictures,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21 (4), 23–45.
30.
De MatosCelso AugustoRossiCarlos Alberto Vargas (2008), “Word-of-Mouth Communications in Marketing: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Antecedents and Moderators,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (4), 578–96.
31.
DePauloBella M.KashyDeborah A.KirkendolSusan E.WyerMelissa M.EpsteinJennifer A. (1996), “Lying in Everyday Life,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (5), 979–95.
32.
DuboisDavidBonezziAndreaDe AngelisMatteo (2016), “Sharing with Friends Versus Strangers: How Interpersonal Closeness Influences Word-of-Mouth Valence,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (5), 712–27.
33.
EisingerichAndreas B.ChunHaeEun HelenLiuYeyiJiaHeBellSimon J. (2015), “Why Recommend a Brand Face-to-Face but Not on Facebook? How Word-of-Mouth on Online Social Sites Differs from Traditional Word-of-Mouth,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (1), 120–28.
34.
FiedlerKlausJungJanisWänkeMichaelaAlexopoulosTheodore (2012), “On the Relations Between Distinct Aspects of Psychological Distance: An Ecological Basis of Construal-Level Theory,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48 (5), 1014–21.
35.
FrenzenJonathanNakamotoKent (1993), “Structure, Cooperation, and the Flow of Market Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (3), 360–75.
36.
GinoFrancescaGalinskyAdam D. (2012), “Vicarious Dishonesty: When Psychological Closeness Creates Distance from One’s Moral Compass,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119 (1), 15–26.
37.
GranovetterMark S. (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360–80.
38.
HayesAndrew F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
39.
HechterMichaelOppKarl-Dieter (2001), Social Norms. Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
Hennig-ThurauThorstenGwinnerKevin P.WalshGianfrancoGremlerDwayne D. (2004), “Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18 (1), 38–52.
41.
HerzensteinMichalPosavacSteven S.BrakusJ. Joško (2007), “Adoption of New and Really New Products: The Effects of Self-Regulation Systems and Risk Salience,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (2), 251–60.
42.
HollandRob W.RoederUte-Reginavan BaarenRick B.BrandtAafje C.HannoverBettina (2004), “Don’t Stand So Close to Me: The Effects of Self-Construal on Interpersonal Closeness,” Psychological Science, 15 (4), 237–42.
JacobyJacobKaplanLeon B. (1972), “The Components of Perceived Risk,” Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, 10, 382–93.
46.
JiangLanHoeggJoandreaDahlDarren W.ChattopadhyayAmitava (2009), “The Persuasive Role of Incidental Similarity on Attitudes and Purchase Intentions in a Sales Context,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 778–91.
47.
JiménezFernando R.MendozaNorma A. (2013), “Too Popular to Ignore: The Influence of Online Reviews on Purchase Intentions of Search and Experience Products,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27 (3), 226–35.
KingRobert AllenRacherlaPradeepBushVictoria D. (2014), “What We Know and Don’t Know About Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28 (3), 167–83.
50.
LampelJosephBhallaAjay (2007), “The Role of Status Seeking in Online Communities: Giving the Gift of Experience,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (2), 434–55.
51.
LinNanEnselWalter M.VaughnJohn C. (1981), “Social Resources and Strength of Ties: Structural Factors in Occupational Status Attainment,” American Sociological Review, 46 (4), 393–405.
52.
LuoXueming (2009), “Quantifying the Long-Term Impact of Negative Word of Mouth on Cash Flows and Stock Prices,” Marketing Science, 28 (1), 148–65.
53.
MacraeC. NeilBodenhausenGalen V.MilneAlan B.JettenJolanda (1994), “Out of Mind but Back in Sight: Stereotypes on the Rebound,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808–17.
54.
MadanShilpaBasuShankhaNgSharonLimElison Ai Ching (2018), “Impact of Culture on the Pursuit of Beauty: Evidence from Five Countries,” Journal of International Marketing, 26 (4), 54–68.
55.
ManerJon K.DeWallC. NathanBaumeisterRoy F.SchallerMark (2007), “Does Social Exclusion Motivate Interpersonal Reconnection? Resolving the ‘Porcupine Problem,’” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92 (1), 42–55.
56.
MarkusHazel R.KitayamaShinobu (1991), “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation,” Psychological Review, 98 (2), 224–53.
57.
MazzarolTimSweeneyJillian C.SoutarGeoffrey N. (2007), “Conceptualizing Word-of-Mouth Activity, Triggers and Conditions: An Exploratory Study,” European Journal of Marketing, 41 (11–12), 1475–94.
58.
MendozaSaaid A.LaneSean P.AmodioDavid M. (2014), “For Members Only: Ingroup Punishment of Fairness Norm Violations in the Ultimatum Game,” Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5 (6), 662–70.
59.
MeuterMatthew L.OstromAmy L.RoundtreeRobert I.BitnerMary Jo (2000), “Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters,” Journal of Marketing, 64 (3), 50–64.
60.
MirandaSandraDuarteMargarida (2022), “How Perfectionism Reduces Positive Word-of-Mouth: The Mediating Role of Perceived Social Risk,” Psychology & Marketing, 39 (2), 255–70.
61.
MooreSarah G. (2015), “Attitude Predictability and Helpfulness in Online Reviews: The Role of Explained Actions and Reactions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (1), 30–44.
62.
MoreauC. PageLehmannDonald R.MarkmanArthur B. (2001), “Entrenched Knowledge Structures and Consumer Response to New Products,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (1), 14–29.
OrehekEdwardSasotaJo A.KruglanskiArie W.DechesneMarkRidgewayLeianna (2014), “Interdependent Self-Construals Mitigate the Fear of Death and Augment the Willingness to Become a Martyr,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107 (2), 265–75.
66.
OuelletteJudith A.WoodWendy (1998), “Habit and Intention in Everyday Life: The Multiple Processes by Which Past Behavior Predicts Future Behavior,” Psychological Bulletin, 124, 54–74.
67.
PhilpMatthewNepomucenoMarcelo Vinhal (2020), “When the Frugal Become Wasteful: An Examination into How Impression Management Can Initiate the End-Stages of Consumption for Frugal Consumers,” Psychology & Marketing, 37 (2), 326–39.
68.
PiçarraNunoGigerJean-Christophe (2018), “Predicting Intention to Work with Social Robots at Anticipation Stage: Assessing the Role of Behavioral Desire and Anticipated Emotions,” Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 129–46.
69.
PodolnyJoel M.BaronJames N. (1997), “Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace,” American Sociological Review, 62 (5), 673–93.
70.
PoulinMichael J.MinisteroLauren M.GabrielShiraMorrisonC. DaleNaiduEsha (2021), “Minding Your Own Business? Mindfulness Decreases Prosocial Behavior for People with Independent Self-Construals,” Psychological Science, 32 (11), 1699–708.
71.
ProserpioDavideZervasGeorgios (2017), “Online Reputation Management: Estimating the Impact of Management Responses on Consumer Reviews,” Marketing Science, 36 (5), 645–65.
72.
PurnawirawanNathaliaEisendMartinDe PelsmackerPatrickDensNathalie (2015), “A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Role of Valence in Online Reviews,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 31, 17–27.
73.
RimSoYonMinKate E.LiuPeggy J.ChartrandTanya L.TropeYaacov (2019), “The Gift of Psychological Closeness: How Feasible Versus Desirable Gifts Reduce Psychological Distance to the Giver,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45 (3), 360–71.
74.
RitsonMarkElliottRichard (1999), “The Social Uses of Advertising: An Ethnographic Study of Adolescent Advertising Audiences,” Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (3), 260–77.
75.
SchneiderJoanHallJulie (2011), “Why Most Product Launches Fail,” Harvard Business Review, 89 (4), 21–23.
76.
SingelisTheodore M. (1994), “The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20 (5), 580–91.
77.
SundaramD.S.MitraKaushikWebsterCynthia (1998), “Word-of-Mouth Communications: A Motivational Analysis,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25, AlbaJoseph W.HutchinsonJ. Wesley, eds. Association for Consumer Research, 527–31.
78.
TangChuanyiGuoLin (2015), “Digging for Gold with a Simple Tool: Validating Text Mining in Studying Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM) Communication,” Marketing Letters, 26 (1), 67–80.
79.
TropeYaacovLibermanNira (2010), “Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance,” Psychological Review, 117 (2), 440–63.
80.
TyagiRajeev K. (2006), “New Product Introductions and Failures Under Uncertainty,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23 (2), 199–213.
81.
VermaSanjeevYadavNeha (2021), “Past, Present, and Future of Electronic Word of Mouth (EWOM),” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 53 (1), 111–28.
82.
VosoughiSoroushRoyDebAralSinan (2018), “The Spread of True and False News Online,” Science, 359 (6380), 1146–51.
83.
VrijAldert (2008), Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.
84.
WeenigMieneke W.MiddenCees J. (1991), “Communication Network Influences on Information Diffusion and Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 (5), 734–42.
85.
WienAnders HaugeOlsenSvein Ottar (2014), “Understanding the Relationship Between Individualism and Word of Mouth: A Self-Enhancement Explanation,” Psychology & Marketing, 31 (6), 416–25.
86.
WilsonElizabeth J.SherrellDaniel L. (1993), “Source Effects in Communication and Persuasion Research: A Meta-Analysis of Effect Size,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21 (2), 101–12.
87.
WinterichKaren PageBaroneMichael J. (2011), “Warm Glow or Cold, Hard Cash? Social Identity Effects on Consumer Choice for Donation Versus Discount Promotions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (5), 855–68.
88.
WinterichKaren PageGangwarManishGrewalRajdeep (2018), “When Celebrities Count: Power Distance Beliefs and Celebrity Endorsements,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (3), 70–86.
89.
ZablockiAgnieszkaMakriKaterinaHoustonMichael J. (2019), “Emotions Within Online Reviews and Their Influence on Product Attitudes in Austria, USA and Thailand,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 46, 20–39.
90.
ZhangHaoLiangXiaoningQiChenyue (2021), “Investigating the Impact of Interpersonal Closeness and Social Status on Electronic Word-of-Mouth Effectiveness,” Journal of Business Research, 130, 453–61.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
