Consumers are increasingly expected to be active in managing their personal well-being. Agency, meaning individuals’ ability to reflect on their circumstances, effect change, and act independently, constitutes an important means for consumer well-being. To a growing extent, consumers are using smart technologies, such as wearable devices and applications, to better manage their well-being. However, how interactions with wearables improve and affect consumer agency for well-being is underexamined. The aim of this study is to explore how consumers use smart wearable technologies as resources for agency in managing their well-being. Drawing on psychological and sociological literature on agency as well as qualitative data from users of various wearable devices, the authors distinguish individual and contextual levels of agency, in which knowing and acting constitute two types of smart wearable technology use. From these dimensions, they conceptualize a framework with four types of technology use for well-being: (1) self-improvement, (2) justification, (3) adaptation, and (4) activism. The authors discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of this framework with the aim of improving consumer agency for well-being through smart technology.
AjanaBtihaj (2017), “Digital Health and the Biopolitics of the Quantified Self,” Digital Health, 3, 1–18.
2.
AllmendingerGlenLombregliaRalph (2005), “Four Strategies for the Age of Smart Service,” Harvard Business Review, 83 (10), 131–45.
3.
AndersonLaurelOstromAmy L. (2015), “Transformative Service Research: Advancing Our Knowledge About Service and Well-Being,” Journal of Service Research, 18 (3), 243–49.
4.
AndersonLaurelOstromAmy L.CorusCananFiskRaymond P.GallanAndrew S.GiraldoMario, et al. (2013), “Transformative Service Research: An Agenda for the Future,” Journal of Business Research, 66 (8), 1203–10.
5.
AndersonLaurelSpanjolJelenaJefferiesJosephine GoOstromAmy L.BakerCourtney NationsBoneSterling A.DowneyHilaryMendeMartinRappJustine M. (2016), “Responsibility and Well-Being: Resource Integration Under Responsibilization in Expert Services,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 35 (2), 262–79.
6.
BagozziRichard P.DholakiaUtpal (1999), “Goal Setting and Goal Striving in Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (4), 19–32.
7.
BanduraAlbert (2001), “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective,” Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
8.
BanduraAlbert (2006), “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1 (2), 164–80.
9.
BarleyStephen R.TolbertPamela S. (1997), “Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links Between Action and Institution,” Organization Studies, 18 (1), 93–117.
10.
BaumeisterRoy F.VohsKathleen D.AakerJennifer L.GarbinskyEmily N. (2013), “Some Key Differences Between a Happy Life and a Meaningful Life,” Journal of Positive Psychology, 8 (6), 505–16.
11.
BergMartin (2017), “Making Sense with Sensors: Self-Tracking and the Temporalities of Wellbeing,” Digital Health, 3, 1–11.
12.
BianchiConstanzaTuzovicSvenKuppelwieserVolker G. (2022), “Investigating the Drivers of Wearable Technology Adoption for Healthcare in South America,” Information Technology & People (published online April 8), https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0049.
13.
BlockerChristopher P.BarriosAndrés (2015), “The Transformative Value of a Service Experience,” Journal of Service Research, 18 (3), 265–83.
14.
ČaićMartinaOdekerken-SchröderGabyMahrDominik (2018), “Service Robots: Value Co-Creation and Co-Destruction in Elderly Care Networks,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (2), 178–205.
15.
CheungLilliemayMcColl-KennedyJanet R. (2019), “Addressing Vulnerability: What Role Does Marketing Play?” Journal of Services Marketing, 33 (6), 660–70.
16.
EdvardssonBoTronvollBårdGruberThorsten (2011), “Expanding Understanding of Service Exchange and Value Co-Creation: A Social Construction Approach,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (2), 327–39.
17.
ElgMattiasGremyrIdaHalldórssonÁrniWalloAndreas (2020), “Service Action Research: Review and Guidelines,” Journal of Services Marketing, 34 (1), 87–99.
18.
EtkinJordan (2016), “The Hidden Cost of Personal Quantification,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (6), 967–84.
19.
FengShangMäntymäkiMattiDhirAmandeepSalmelaHannu (2021), “How Self-Tracking and the Quantified Self Promote Health and Well-Being: Systematic Review,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23 (9), e25171.
20.
FerreiraJoão J.FernandesCristina I.RammalHussain G.VeigaPedro M. (2021), “Wearable Technology and Consumer Interaction: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda,” Computers in Human Behavior, 118 (May), 106710.
21.
FuentesChristianSörumNiklas (2019), “Agencing Ethical Consumers: Smartphone Apps and the Socio-Material Reconfiguration of Everyday Life,” Consumption Markets & Culture, 22 (2), 131–56.
22.
GiddensAnthony (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration. University of California Press.
23.
GieslerMarkusVeresiuEla (2014), “Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (3), 840–57.
24.
GonçalvesLuisaPatrícioLiaTeixeiraJorge GrenhaWünderlichNancy V. (2020), “Understanding the Customer Experience with Smart Services,” Journal of Service Management, 31 (4), 723–44.
25.
GuestGregBunceArwenJohnsonLaura (2006), “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability,” Field Methods, 18 (1), 59–82.
26.
GummerusJohannaLipkinMichaelaDubeAprameyHeinonenKristina (2019), “Technology in Use – Characterizing Customer Self-Service Devices (SSDS),” Journal of Services Marketing, 33 (1), 1, 44–56.
27.
GummessonEvert (2005), “Qualitative Research in Marketing: Road-Map for a Wilderness of Complexity and Unpredictability,” European Journal of Marketing, 39 (3–4), 309–27.
28.
HenkensBiekeVerleyeKatrienLarivièreBart (2021), “The Smarter, the Better?! Customer Well-Being, Engagement, and Perceptions in Smart Service Systems,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38 (2), 425–47.
29.
HoyerWayne D.KroschkeMirjaSchmittBerndKraumeKarstenShankarVenkatesh (2020), “Transforming the Customer Experience Through New Technologies,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 51 (1), 57–71.
30.
HyersLauri L.SwimJanes K.MallettRobyn K. (2011), “The Personal Is Political: Using Daily Diaries to Examine Everyday Prejudice-Related Experiences,” in Emergent Methods in Social Research, Hesse-BiberSharlene N.LeavyPatricia, eds. SAGE Publications, 313–36.
31.
KariTuomasKoivunenSannaFrankLauriMakkonenMarkusMoilanenPanu (2017), “The Expected and Perceived Well-Being Effects of Short-Term Self-Tracking Technology Use,” International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 17 (4), 354–70.
32.
KeyesCorey Lee M. (1998), “Social Well-Being,” Social Psychology Quarterly, 61 (2), 121–40.
33.
KimTaejungChiuWeisheng (2019), “Consumer Acceptance of Sports Wearable Technology: The Role of Technology Readiness,” International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 20 (1), 109–26.
34.
Koskela-HuotariKaisaVargoStephen L. (2016), “Institutions as Resource Context,” Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26 (2), 163–78.
35.
LabrecqueLauren I.vor dem EscheJonasMathwickCharlaNovakThomas P.HofackerCharles F. (2013), “Consumer Power: Evolution in the Digital Age,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27 (4), 257–69.
36.
LeinoHenna (2017), “Secondary but Significant: Secondary Customers’ Existence, Vulnerability, and Needs in Care Services,” Journal of Services Marketing, 31 (7), 760–70.
37.
LiHeWuJingGaoYiwenShiYao (2016), “Examining Individuals’ Adoption of Healthcare Wearable Devices: An Empirical Study from Privacy Calculus Perspective,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, 88 (April), 8–17.
38.
LiuChihlingKeelingDebbie I.HoggMargaret K. (2016), “Strategy Narratives and Wellbeing Challenges: The Role of Everyday Self-Presentation,” Journal of Business Research, 69 (1), 234–43.
39.
LunneyAbbeyCunninghamNicole R.EastinMatthew S. (2016), “Wearable Fitness Technology: A Structural Investigation into Acceptance and Perceived Outcomes,” Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 114–20.
40.
MeleCristinaMarzulloMarialuisaDi BernardoIreneRusso-SpenaTizianaMassiRobertaLa SalandraAlessandraCialabriniStefania (2022), “A Smart Tech Lever to Augment Caregivers’ Touch and Foster Vulnerable Patient Engagement and Well-Being,” Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 32 (1), 52–74.
41.
MeleCristinaNenonenSuviPelsJaquelineStorbackaKajNariswariAngelineKaartemoValtteri (2018), “Shaping Service Ecosystems: Exploring the Dark Side of Agency,” Journal of Service Management, 29 (4), 521–45.
42.
MendeMartinScottMauraNenkovGergana (2016), “Understanding the Quantified Self: Effects of Self-Tracking on Mortality Salience and Health Motivation,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 44, MoreauPagePuntoniStefano, eds. Association for Consumer Research, 65–69.
43.
NascimentoBrunoOliveiraTiagoTamCarlos (2018), “Wearable Technology: What Explains Continuance Intention in Smartwatches?” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 157–69.
44.
O’ConnorGenevieve E.MyrdenSusanAlkire (née Nasr)LindaLeeKyungwonKöcherSörenKandampullyJayWilliamsJerome D. (2021), “Digital Health Experience: A Regulatory Focus Perspective,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 56, 121–36.
45.
OrlikowskiWanda J. (1992), “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science, 3 (3), 398–427.
46.
OstromAmy L.FieldJoy M.FotheringhamDarimaSubramonyMaheshGustafssonAndersLemonKatherine N.HuangMing-HuiMcColl-KennedyJanet R. (2021), “Service Research Priorities: Managing and Delivering Service in Turbulent Times,” Journal of Service Research, 24 (3), 329–53.
47.
PaluchStefanieTuzovicSven (2019), “Persuaded Self-Tracking with Wearable Technology: Carrot or Stick?” Journal of Services Marketing, 33 (4), 436–48.
48.
PattonMichael Q. (2015), Qualitative Evaluation & Research Methods. SAGE Publications.
49.
Pellandini-SimányiLénaConteLeonardo (2021), “Consumer De-Responsibilization: Changing Notions of Consumer Subjects and Market Moralities After the 2008-9 Financial Crisis,” Consumption Markets & Culture, 24 (3), 280–305.
50.
PitardiValentinaWirtzJochenPaluchStefanieKunzWerner H. (2022), “Service Robots, Agency and Embarrassing Service Encounters,” Journal of Service Management, 33 (2), 389–414.
51.
RyanRichard M.DeciEdward L. (2000), “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being,” American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68–78.
52.
RyffCarol D. (1989), “Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (6), 1069–81.
53.
RyffCarol D.SingerBurton H. (2008), “Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being,” Journal of Happiness Studies, 9 (1), 13–39.
54.
SandelowskiMargarete (2011), “When a Cigar Is Not Just a Cigar: Alternative Takes on Data and Data Analysis,” Research in Nursing & Health, 34 (4), 342–52.
55.
SchusterLisaTossanVessélinaDrennanJudy (2017), “Consumer Acceptance of MHealth Services: A Comparison of Behavioral Intention Models,” Services Marketing Quarterly, 38 (2), 115–28.
56.
SetterstenRichard A.GannonLynn (2005), “Structure, Agency, and the Space Between: On the Challenges and Contradictions of a Blended View of the Life Course,” in Towards an Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Life Course, LevyRenéGhisletaPaoloLe GoffJean-MarieSpiniDarioWidmerEric, eds. Elsevier, 35–55.
57.
SewellWilliam H. (1992), “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation,” American Journal of Sociology, 98 (1), 1–29.
SpiggleSusan (1994), “Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (3), 491–503.
60.
StiglbauerBarbaraWeberSilvanaBatinicBernad (2019), “Does Your Health Really Benefit from Using a Self-Tracking Device? Evidence from a Longitudinal Randomized Control Trial,” Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 131–39.
61.
Suranyi-UngerTheodore (1981), “Consumer Behavior and Consumer Well-Being: An Economist’s Digest,” Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (2), 132–43.
62.
TikkanenHannu (2020), “Characterizing Well-Being Capabilities in Services,” Journal of Services Marketing, 34 (6), 785–95.
63.
VargoStephen L.WielandHeikoAkakaMelissa Archpru (2015), “Innovation Through Institutionalization: A Service Ecosystems Perspective,” Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63–72.
64.
VerhoefPeter C.StephenAndrew T.KannanP.K.LuoXuemingAbhishekVibhanshuAndrewsMichelle, et al. (2017), “Consumer Connectivity in a Complex, Technology-Enabled, and Mobile-Oriented World with Smart Products,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 40, 1–8.
65.
VinkJosinaKoskela-HuotariKaisa (2022), “Building Reflexivity Using Service Design Methods,” Journal of Service Research, 25 (3), 371–89.
66.
WittkowskiK.KleinJan F.FalkTomasSchepersJeroen J.L.AsparaJaakkoBergnerKai N. (2020), “What Gets Measured Gets Done: Can Self-Tracking Technologies Enhance Advice Compliance?” Journal of Service Research, 23 (3), 281–98.
67.
WünderlichNancy V.HeinonenKristinaOstromAmy L.PatricioLiaSousaRuiVossChrisLemminkJos G.A.M. (2015), “‘Futurizing Smart Service’: Implications for Service Researchers and Managers,” Journal of Services Marketing, 29 (6–7), 442–47.
68.
ZakariahAmalinaHosanySameerCappelliniBenedetta (2021), “Subjectivities in Motion: Dichotomies in Consumer Engagements with Self-Tracking Technologies,” Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106699.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
