To quickly develop awareness of time-limited offers, marketers use an increasing number of eWOM solicitations, whereby they ask their customers to spread statements to their friends and acquaintances about products or a company. Despite growing interest in this communication tool, very little is known about what makes an efficient solicitation strategy. This research examines the drivers of consumers’ willingness to generate solicited eWOM for a time-limited offer. Using an experimental framework, this research shows that the most efficient strategy for generating solicited eWOM when it is the most valuable is to solicit well before the deadline using a gain- (loss-) framing solicitation on engaged (nonengaged) individuals.
AlterAdam L.OppenheimerDaniel M. (2009), “Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13 (3), 219–35. doi:10.1177/1088868309341564.
3.
Babić RosarioAnaDe ValckKristineSotgiuFrancesca (2020), “Conceptualizing the Electronic Word-of-Mouth Process: What We Know and Need to Know About EWOM Creation, Exposure, and Evaluation,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (3), 422–48. doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00706-1.
4.
BergerJonah (2014), “Word of Mouth and Interpersonal Communication: A Review and Directions for Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 586–607.
5.
BlockLauren G.KellerPunam Anand (1995), “When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-Related Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (2), 192–203.
6.
BorgGunnar (1990), “Psychophysical Scaling with Applications in Physical Work and the Perception of Exertion,” Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 16 (1), 55–58.
7.
ChaikenShelly (1980), “Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (5), 752–66.
8.
ChevalierJudith A.MayzlinDina (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (3), 345–54.
9.
ColomboMassimo G.FranzoniChiaraRossi-LamastraCristina (2015), “Internal Social Capital and the Attraction of Early Contributions in Crowdfunding,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39 (1), 75–100. doi:10.1111/etap.12118.
10.
De BruynArnaudLilienGary L. (2008), “A Multi-Stage Model of Word-of-Mouth Influence Through Viral Marketing,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25 (3), 151–63. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.03.004.
11.
DharRaviKimEunice Y. (2007), “Seeing the Forest or the Trees: Implications of Construal Level Theory for Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17 (2), 96–100.
12.
FilieriRaffaele (2015), “What Makes Online Reviews Helpful? A Diagnosticity-Adoption Framework to Explain Informational and Normative Influences in e-WOM,” Journal of Business Research, 68 (6), 1261–70. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.006.
13.
Hennig-ThurauThorstenGwinnerKevin P.WalshGianfrancoGremlerDwayne D. (2004), “Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18 (1), 38–52. doi:10.1002/dir.10073.
14.
HigginsE. ToryIdsonLorraine ChenFreitasAntonio L.SpiegelScottMoldenDaniel C. (2003), “Transfer of Value from Fit,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (6), 1140.
15.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47 (2), 263–91.
16.
KimHakkyunRaoAkshay R.LeeAngela Y. (2008), “It’s Time to Vote: The Effect of Matching Message Orientation and Temporal Frame on Political Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (6), 877–89.
17.
LeeAngelaAakerJennifer (2004), “Bringing the Frame into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (2), 205–18.
18.
LevinIrwin P.SchneiderSandra L.GaethGary J. (1998), “All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76 (2), 149–88. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804.
19.
LibermanNiraSagristanoMichael D.TropeYaacov (2002), “The Effect of Temporal Distance on Level of Mental Construal,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38 (6), 523–34.
20.
LibermanNiraTropeYaacov (1998), “The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (1), 5–18.
21.
LibermanNiraTropeYaacovWakslakCheryl J. (2007), “Construal Level Theory and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17 (2), 113–17. doi:10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70017-7.
22.
MagnoFrancescaCassiaFabioBruniAttilio (2018), “‘Please Write a (Great) Online Review for My Hotel!’ Guests’ Reactions to Solicited Reviews,” Journal of Vacation Marketing, 24 (2), 148–58.
23.
MaheswaranDurairajMeyers-LevyJoan (1990), “The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement,” Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (3), 361–67.
24.
MaxhamG. JamesIIINetemeyerRichard G (2002), “Modeling Customer Perceptions of Complaint Handling Over Time: The Effects of Perceived Justice on Satisfaction and Intent,” Journal of Retailing, 78 (4), 239–52. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(02)00100-8.
25.
MeyerowitzBeth E.ChaikenShelly (1987), “The Effect of Message Framing on Breast Self-Examination Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (3), 500–10.
26.
Meyers-LevyJoanMaheswaranDurairaj (2004), “Exploring Message Framing Outcomes When Systematic, Heuristic, or Both Types of Processing Occur,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (1), 159–67.
27.
MollickEthan (2014), “The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study,” Journal of Business Venturing, 29 (1), 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005.
28.
MorganRobert M.HuntShelby D. (1994), “The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 20–38. doi:10.2307/1252308.
29.
MunichorNiraLeBoeufRobyn A. (2018), “The Influence of Time-Interval Descriptions on Goal-Pursuit Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 55 (2), 291–303.
30.
PandelaereMarioBriersBarbaraLembregtsChristophe (2011), “How to Make a 29% Increase Look Bigger: The Unit Effect in Option Comparisons,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (2), 308–22.
31.
PodsakoffPhilip M.MacKenzieScott B.LeeJeong-YeonPodsakoffNathan P. (2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
32.
SchwarzNorbertCloreGerald L. (1983), “Mood, Misattribution, and Judgments of Well-Being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (3), 513.
33.
SeptiantoFelixNortheyGavinDolanRebecca (2019), “The Effects of Political Ideology and Message Framing on Counterfeiting: The Mediating Role of Emotions,” Journal of Business Research, 99, 206–14. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.059.
34.
StephenAndrew T.LehmannDonald R. (2016), “How Word-of-Mouth Transmission Encouragement Affects Consumers’ Transmission Decisions, Receiver Selection, and Diffusion Speed,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33 (4), 755–66. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.08.003.
35.
VermaSanjeevYadavNeha (2021), “Past, Present, and Future of Electronic Word of Mouth (EWOM),” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 53 (February), 111–28.
36.
VivekShiri D.BeattySharon E.MorganRobert M. (2012), “Customer Engagement: Exploring Customer Relationships Beyond Purchase,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20 (2), 122–46.
37.
Von NeumannJohnMorgensternOskar (1944), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
WhiteKatherineMacDonnellRhiannonDahlDarren W. (2011), “It’s the Mind-Set That Matters: The Role of Construal Level and Message Framing in Influencing Consumer Efficacy and Conservation Behaviors,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (3), 472–85.
39.
WoolleyKaitlinSharifMarissa A. (2021), “Incentives Increase Relative Positivity of Review Content and Enjoyment of Review Writing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 58 (3), 539–58. doi:10.1177/00222437211010439.
40.
YanDengfengSenguptaJaideepHongJiewen (2016), “Why Does Psychological Distance Influence Construal Level? The Role of Processing Mode,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (4), 598–613.
41.
YouYaVadakkepattGautham G.JoshiAmit M. (2015), “A Meta-Analysis of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Elasticity,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (2), 19–39. doi:10.1509/jm.14.0169.
42.
ZhangLuYangWan (2019), “Consumers’ Responses to Invitations to Write Online Reviews: The Impact of Message Framing, Power and Need for Status,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31 (4), 1609–25. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-01-2018-0022.
43.
ZhangMengZhangGuang-yuGursoyDoganFuXiao-rong (2018), “Message Framing and Regulatory Focus Effects on Destination Image Formation,” Tourism Management, 69, 397–407. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.025.
