Multi-actor exchange relationships involving platforms and individual service providers have become increasingly common in the online service sector. Drawing on attribution theory, this study identifies a phenomenon called the “locus-responsibility shift,” a form of scapegoating in which consumers transfer responsibility for service failures to a platform, even after recognizing the individual provider as the source of the problem. By uncovering this phenomenon, we challenge the traditional understanding of attribution and highlight the unique challenges platforms face in dealing with service failures. A text analysis of 24,183 consumer complaints and 4 experimental studies reveals that consumers on high (vs. low) intermediation platforms, those who experience severe (vs. mild) service failures, and those dealing with encounter (vs. core) service issues are more likely to attribute responsibility to the platform. These findings have important managerial implications for platform managers and offer guidance for developing effective platform strategies and service recovery practices to enhance customer satisfaction and safeguard platform’s reputation.
AlbrechtA. K.WalshG.BeattyS. E. (2017), “Perceptions of Group Versus Individual Service Failures and their Effects on Customer Outcomes: The Role of Attributions and Customer Entitlement,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (2), 188-203.
2.
Augusto de MatosC.Vargas RossiC. A.VeigaR. TeixeiraVieiraV. Afonso (2009), “Consumer Reaction to Service Failure and Recovery: The Moderating Role of Attitude Toward Complaining,” Journal of Services Marketing, 23 (7), 462-75.
3.
BonifieldC.ColeC. (2007), “Affective Responses to Service Failure: Anger, Regret, and Retaliatory Versus Conciliatory Responses,” Marketing Letters, 18 (1), 85-99.
4.
BrowningV.SoK. K. F.SparksB. (2013), “The Influence of Online Reviews on Consumers’ Attributions of Service Quality and Control for Service Standards in Hotels,” Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30 (1-2), 23-40.
5.
ChatterjeeS. (2018), “Impact of Actual Service Provider Failure on the Satisfaction with Aggregator,” Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26 (7), 628-47.
6.
ChoiS.MattilaA. S. (2008), “Perceived Controllability and Service Expectations: Influences on Customer Reactions Following Service Failure,” Journal of Business Research, 61 (1), 24-30.
7.
CostelloJ. P.ReczekR. W. (2020), “Providers Versus Platforms: Marketing Communications in the Sharing Economy,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (6), 22-38.
8.
de MatosC. A.HenriqueJ. L.AlbertoC.RossiVargas (2007), “Service Recovery Paradox: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Service Research, 10 (1), 60-77.
9.
DengX.JoshiK. D.GalliersR. D. (2016), “The Duality of Empowerment and Marginalization in Microtask Crowdsourcing,” MIS Quarterly, 40 (2), 279-302.
10.
DevlinJ.ChangM. W.LeeK.ToutanovK. (2018), “BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Vol. 1 (Long and Short Papers). Minneapolis, MN: Association for Computational Linguistics, 4171-86.
11.
DuJ.FanX.FengT. (2014), “Group Emotional Contagion and Complaint Intentions in Group Service Failure: The Role of Group Size and Group Familiarity,” Journal of Service Research, 17 (3), 326-38.
12.
DunnB.JensenM. L.RalstonR. (2021), “Attribution of Responsibility After Failures Within Platform Ecosystems,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 38 (2), 546-70.
13.
EdwardsJ. A. (1998), “Effects of Causal Uncertainty on the Dispositional Attribution Process,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34 (2), 109-35.
14.
FolkesV. S. (1984), “Consumer Reactions to Product Failure: An Attributional Approach,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (4), 398-409.
15.
FolkesV. S. (1988), “Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (4), 548-65.
16.
FolkesV. S.KoletskyS.GrahamJ. L. (1987), “A Field Study of Causal Inferences and Consumer Reaction: The View from the Airport,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (4), 534-39.
17.
FuX.LiuX.HuaC.LiZ.DuQ. (2021), “Understanding Tour Guides’ Service Failure: Integrating a Two-Tier Tiadic Business Model with Attribution Theory,” Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47, 506-16.
18.
FullertonR. A.PunjG. (2004), “Repercussions of Promoting an Ideology of Consumption: Consumer Misbehavior,” Journal of Business Research, 57 (11), 1239-49.
19.
GaileyJ. A. (2013), “Attribution of Responsibility for Organizational Wrongdoing: A Partial Test of an Integrated Model,” Journal of Criminology, 2013 (4), 1-10.
20.
GelbrichK.RoschkH. (2011), “A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses,” Journal of Service Research, 14 (1), 24-43.
21.
GrégoireY.LauferD.TrippT. M. (2010), “A Comprehensive Model of Customer Direct and Indirect Revenge: Understanding the Effects of Perceived Greed and Customer Power,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38 (6), 738-58.
22.
HarveyP.MadisonK.MartinkoM.CrookT. R.CrookT. A. (2014), “Attribution Theory in the Organizational Sciences: The Road Traveled and the Path Ahead,” Academy of Management Perspectives, 28 (2), 128-46.
23.
HessR. L.GanesanS.KleinN. M. (2003), “Service Failure and Recovery: The Impact of Relationship Factors on Customer Satisfaction,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (2), 127-45.
24.
HolgerR.MasoumehH.JanB. (2023). “Coalitions and Their Negative Consequences: An Examination in Service Failure-Recovery Situations,” Journal of Service Research, 26 (4), 614-635.
25.
JörlingM.BöhmR.PaluchS. (2019), “Service Robots: Drivers of Perceived Responsibility for Service Outcomes,” Journal of Service Research, 22 (4), 404-20.
26.
KeaveneyS. M. (1995), “Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries: An Exploratory Study,” Journal of Marketing, 59 (2), 71-82.
27.
KelleyH. H.MichelaJ. L. (1980), “Attribution Theory and Research,” Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457-501.
28.
KetronS.MaiS. (2022), “Blame and Service Recovery Strategies in Lateral Exchange Markets,” Journal of Strategic Marketing, 30 (1), 3-21.
29.
KhamitovM.GrégoireY.SuriA. (2020), “A Systematic Review of Brand Transgression, Service Failure Recovery and Product-Harm Crisis: Integration and Guiding Insights,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (3), 519-42.
30.
KimH.SoK. K. F.MihalikB. (2022), “Disentangling the Dynamics of Service Failure and Service Recovery in Peer-to-Peer Accommodations: A Triadic Perspective,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, 100, 103086.
31.
LagnadoD. A.ChannonS. (2008), “Judgments of Cause and Blame: The Effects of Intentionality and Foreseeability,” Cognition, 108 (3), 754-70.
32.
LauferD.GillespieK.McBrideB.GonzalezS. (2005), “The Role of Severity in Consumer Attributions of Blame,” Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 17 (2-3), 33-50.
33.
LeeB.CranageD. A. (2018), “Causal Attributions and Overall Blame of Self-Service Technology (SST) Failure: Different from Service Failures by Employee and Policy,” Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 27 (1), 61-84.
34.
ManuC.SreejeshS.JustinP. (2021), “Tell Us Your Concern, and We Shall Together Address! Role of Service Booking Channels and Brand Equity on Post-Failure Outcomes,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, 96, 102982.
35.
MaxhamJ. G.NetemeyerR. G. (2002), “A Longitudinal Study of Complaining Customers’ Evaluations of Multiple Service Failures and Recovery Efforts,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (4), 57-71.
36.
McQuilkenL.RobertsonN. (2011), “The Influence of Guarantees, Active Requests to Voice and Failure Severity on Customer Complaint Behavior,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30 (4), 953-62.
37.
MoonH.WeiW.MiaoL. (2019), “Complaints and Resolutions in a Peer-to-Peer Business Model,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, 81, 239-48.
38.
PerrenR.KozinetsR. V. (2018), “Lateral Exchange Markets: How Social Platforms Operate in a Networked Economy,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (1), 20-36.
39.
RussellD. W.McAuleyE.TaricoV. (1987), “Measuring Causal Attributions for Success and Failure: A Comparison of Methodologies for Assessing Causal Dimensions,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (6), 1248-1257.
40.
ShankD. B.RobinsonD. T. (2019), “Who’s Responsible? Representatives’ Autonomy Alters Customers’ Emotion and Repurchase Intentions Toward Organizations,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36 (1), 155-67.
41.
SmithA. K.BoltonR. N.WagnerJ. (1999), “A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (3), 356-72.
42.
SuriA.HuangB.SénécalS. (2019), “I Can Forgive You, But I Can’t Forgive the Firm: An Examination of Service Failures in the Sharing Economy,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 27 (4), 355-70.
43.
SurprenantC. F.SolomonM. R. (1987), “Predictability and Personalization in the Service Encounter,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (2), 86-96.
44.
TamJ. L. M.SharmaP.KimN. (2016), “Attribution of Success and Failure in Intercultural Service Encounters: The Moderating Role of Personal Cultural Orientations,” Journal of Services Marketing, 30 (6), 643-58.
45.
Van NoortG.WillemsenL. M. (2012), “Online Damage Control: The Effects of Proactive Versus Reactive Webcare Interventions in Consumer-Generated and Brand-Generated Platforms,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26 (3), 131-40.
46.
Van VaerenberghY.OrsingherC.VermeirI.LarivièreB. (2014), “A Meta-Analysis of Relationships Linking Service Failure Attributions to Customer Outcomes,” Journal of Service Research, 17 (4), 381-98.
WeberK.HsuC. H. C. (2021), “Banding Together in a Festival Context: Examining Effects of a Joint-Stakeholder External Service Recovery,” Tourism Management, 83, 104204.
49.
WeberK.HsuC. H. C. (2022), “Beyond a Single Firm and Internal Focus Service Failure/Recovery: Multiple Providers and External Service Recoveries,” Journal of Travel Research, 61 (1), 50-63.
50.
WeinerB. (1979), “A Theory of Motivation for Some Classroom Experiences,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 71 (1), 3-25.
51.
WeinerB. (2000), “Attributional Thoughts About Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (3), 382-87.
52.
WeitzlW.HutzingerC.EinwillerS. (2018), “An Empirical Study on How Webcare Mitigates Complainants’ Failure Attributions and Negative Word-of-Mouth,” Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 316-27.
53.
WirtzJ.McColl-KennedyJ. R. (2010), “Opportunistic Customer Claiming During Service Recovery,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 654-75.
54.
WJS (2022), “China’s Second-hand E-Commerce Consumer Complaints Data and Typical Cases Report, 2021,” (accessed January 17, 2022), http://www.100ec.cn/zt/2021esdstsal/
55.
WuL.LiuS. Q.MaS. (David)HanksL. (2023), “Platform-Centric vs. Multi-Party Service Failure: An Examination of Consumers’ Negative Word of Mouth About Sharing Economy Platforms,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35 (4), 1332-75.
56.
YanN.XunX.TongT.HuangL. (2021), “Examining Consumer Complaints from an On-Demand Service Platform,” International Journal of Production Economics, 237, 108153.
57.
ZembaY.YoungM. J.MorrisM. W. (2006), “Blaming Leaders for Organizational Accidents: Proxy Logic in Collective-Versus Individual-Agency Cultures,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101 (1), 36-51.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
