Previous research has mainly focused on the determinants of consumers’ complaint channel choices. Little attention has been paid to the behavioral consequences of different complaint channels, particularly different complaint devices. Drawing on spatial crowding perception theory, this study finds that in an online complaint context, consumers’ complaint intensity is shaped by complaint devices that differ in screen size. Crowding perception produced by visually restrictive tension mediates the relationship between the screen size of the complaint device and the complaint intensity. The results of secondary data confirm that consumers’ complaint intensity is higher while complaining through a small-screen device (as opposed to a large-screen one). Three scenario-based experiments are conducted to examine the role of perceived spatial crowding in producing a more intense complaint behavior when complaints are submitted through smaller screen devices (as opposed to larger screen devices). The fourth experiment reveals that crowding perception can be lessened by adjusting certain design elements of the interface, ultimately mitigating the intensity of the complaint submitted through a small-screen device. Our research identifies the specific causality and underlying mechanism of the influence of device type on consumers’ postconsumption behavior, thus contributing to clarify some ambiguities in the literature.
BergerJonah (2011), “Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information,” Psychological Science, 22 (7), 891–893.
3.
CareyJohn (1980), “Paralanguage in Computer Mediated Communication,” Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, 54 (June), 67–69.
4.
ChaeMinheeKimJinwoo (2004), “Do Size and Structure Matter to Mobile Users? An Empirical Study of the Effects of Screen Size, Information Structure, and Task Complexity on User Activities with Standard Web Phones,” Behaviour and Information Technology, 23 (3), 165–181.
5.
ChenZoeyLurieNicholas H. (2013), “Temporal Contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word of Mouth,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (4), 463–476.
6.
China Daily (2018), “China’s Top 10 Internet Companies in 2018,” China Daily, August 27.
7.
DiMuroFabrizioMurrayKyle B. (2012), “An Arousal Regulation Explanation of Mood Effects on Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (3), 574–584.
8.
DongZhendong (2007), “HowNet”, (accessed Dec 10, 2017), [available athttp://www.keenage.com].
9.
ErogluSevgin A.MachleitKaren A. (1990), “An Empirical Study of Retail Crowding: Antecedents and Consequences,” Journal of Retailing, 66 (2), 201–221.
10.
FornellClaesLarckerDavid F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.
11.
FuXianghuaLiuGuoGuoYanyanWangZhiqiang (2013), “Multi-Aspect Sentiment Analysis for Chinese Online Social Reviews Based on Topic Modeling and HowNet Lexicon,” Knowledge-Based Systems, 37 (2013), 186–195.
12.
GeBinLiFang-FangGuoSi-LuTangDa-Quan (2010), “Word’s Semantic Similarity Computation Method Based on Hownet,” Application Research of Computers, 27 (9), 3329–3333.
13.
GhoseAnindyaGoldfarbAviHanSang P. (2013), “How Is the Mobile Internet Different? Search Costs and Local Activities,” Information Systems Research, 24 (3), 613–631.
14.
GilesDavidStommelWykePaulusTrenaLesterJessicaReedDarren (2015), “Microanalysis of Online Data: The Methodological Development of ‘Digital CA’,” Discourse Context Media, 7 (March), 45–51.
15.
GriffitWilliamVeitchRussell (1971), “Hot and Crowded: Influence of Population Density and Temperature on Interpersonal Affective Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17 (1), 92–98.
16.
HarrisRanida B.ParadiceDavid (2007), “An Investigation of the Computer-Mediated Communication of Emotions,” Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3 (12), 2081–2090.
17.
HayesAndrew F. (2015), “An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50 (1), 1–22.
18.
HayesAndrew F. (2013), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
19.
HayesAndrew F. (2012), “Process: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling,” white paper, (accessed April 25, 2013), [available athttp://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf].
20.
Hootsuite (2019), “Digital around the World in 2019,” Global Digital Yearbook, January, (accessed December 2, 2019), [available athttps://wearesocial.com].
21.
HuiMichael K.BatesonJohn E. G. (1991), “Perceived Control and the Effects of Crowding and Consumer Choice on the Service Experience,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (2), 174–184.
22.
JergerChristinaWirtzJochen (2017), “Service Employee Responses to Angry Customer Complaints: The Roles of Customer Status and Service Climate,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (4), 362–378.
23.
KimKi J.Shyam SundarS. (2016), “Mobile Persuasion: Can Screen Size and Presentation Mode Make A Difference to Trust,” Human Communication Research, 42 (1), 45–70.
24.
KimKi J.Shyam SundarS. (2014), “Does Screen Size Matter for Smartphones? Utilitarian and Hedonic Effects of Screen Size on Smartphone Adoption,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17 (7), 466–473.
25.
KimKi J.Shyam SundarS. (2013), “Can Interface Features Affect Aggression Resulting from Violent Video Game Play? An Examination of Realistic Controller and Large Screen Size,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16 (5), 329–334.
26.
KimSoo-MinHovyEduard (2004), “Determining the Sentiment of Opinions,” International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 20 (August), 23–27.
27.
KowalskiRobin M. (1996), “Complaints and Complaining: Functions, Antecedents, and Consequences,” Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 279.
28.
LeeSeulCudeBrenda J. (2012), “Consumer Complaint Channel Choice in Online and Offline Purchases,” International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36 (1), 90–96.
29.
LeviDennis M.CarneyThom (2009), “Crowding in Peripheral Vision: Why Bigger Is Better,” Current Biology, 19 (23), 1988–1993.
30.
MachleitKaren A.KellarisJames J.ErogluSevgin A. (1994), “Human Versus Spatial Dimensions of Crowding Perceptions in Retail Environments: A Note on Their Measurement and Effect on Shopper Satisfaction,” Marketing Letters, 5 (2), 183–194.
31.
MartinBrett A. S.SherrardMichael J.WentzelDaniel (2005), “The Role of Sensation Seeking and Need for Cognition on Web-Site Evaluations: A Resource-Matching Perspective,” Psychology & Marketing, 22 (2), 109–126.
32.
MattilaAnna S.WirtzJochen (2004), “Consumer Complaining to Firms: The Determinants of Channel Choice,” Journal of Services Marketing, 18 (2), 147–155.
33.
MehrabianAlbertRussellJames A. (1974), An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
MeredithJoanne (2017), “Analysing Technological Affordances of Online Interactions Using Conversation Analysis,” Journal of Pragmatics, 115 (July), 42–55.
PalmerStephen E. (1992), “Common Region: A New Principle of Perceptual Organization,” Cognitive Psychology, 24 (3), 436–447.
38.
PiccoliGabrieleOttMyle (2014), “Impact of Mobility and Timing on User-Generated Content,” Mis Quarterly Executive, 13 (3), 147–157.
39.
RansbothamSamLurieNicholas H.LiuHongju (2019), “Creation and Consumption of Mobile Word of Mouth: How Are Mobile Reviews Different?” Marketing Science, 38 (5), 773–792.
40.
RapoportAmos (1975), “Toward a Redefinition of Density,” Environment and Behavior, 7 (2), 133–158.
SaarelaToni P.SayimBilgeWestheimerGeraldHerzogMichael H. (2009), “Global Stimulus Configuration Modulates Crowding,” Journal of Vision, 9 (2), 1–11.
44.
SchandorfMichael (2013), “Mediated Gesture: Paralinguistic Communication and Phatic Text,” Convergence, 19 (3), 319–344.
45.
SchererKlaus R. (2000), “Emotion,” in Introduction to Social Psychology: A European Perspective, 3rd ed, HewstoneM.StroebeW.JonasK., eds. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 151–196.
46.
SenShahanaLermanDawn (2007), “Why Are You Telling Me This? An Examination into Negative Consumer Reviews on the Web,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21 (4), 76–94.
47.
ShenHaoZhangMengKrishnaAradhna (2016), “Computer Interfaces and the “Direct-Touch” Effect: Can iPads Increase the Choice of Hedonic Food,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (5), 745–758.
48.
SmithAmy K.BoltonRuth N. (2002), “The Effect of Customers’ Emotional Responses to Service Failures on Their Recovery Effort Evaluations and Satisfaction Judgments,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (1), 5–23.
49.
SohnStefanieSeegebarthBarbaraMoritzMadleen (2017), “The Impact of Perceived Visual Complexity of Mobile Online Shops on User’s Satisfaction: Perceived Visual Complexity of Mobile Online Store,” Psychology and Marketing, 34 (2), 195–214.
50.
StokolsDaniel (1972), “On the Distinction between Density and Crowding: Some Implications for Future Research,” Psychological Review, 79 (3), 275–277.
TaibMohd F. M.BahnSangwooYunMyung H. (2016), “The Effect of Psychosocial Stress on Muscle Activity during Computer Work: Comparative Study between Desktop Computer and Mobile Computing Products,” Work, 54 (2016), 543–555.
55.
VoorheesClay M.BradyMichael K.CalantoneRogerRamirezEdward (2016), “Discriminant Validity Testing in Marketing: An Analysis, Causes for Concern, and Proposed Remedies,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44 (January), 119–134.
56.
WagemansJohanElderJames H.KubovyMichaelPalmerStephen E.PetersonMary A.SinghManishHeydtRüdiger von der (2012), “A Century of Gestalt Psychology in Visual Perception: I. Perceptual Grouping and Figure-Ground Organization,” Psychological Bulletin, 138 (6), 1172–1217.
57.
WhitneyDavidLeviDennis M. (2011), “Visual Crowding: A Fundamental Limit on Conscious Perception and Object Recognition,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15 (4), 160–168.
58.
WuJiangTangChangjieLiTaiyongCuiLiang (2014), “Sentiment Analysis on Web Financial Text Based on Semantic Rules,” Journal of Computer Applications, 34 (2), 481–495.
59.
XuLinhongLinHongfeiPanYuRenHuiChenJianmei (2008), “Constructing the Affective Lexicon Ontology,” Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 27 (2), 180–185.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
