BaldwinC.ClarkK. (2000), Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
BerryL. L. (1995), “Relationship Marketing of Services-Growing Interest, Emerging Perspectives,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23 (4), 236–45.
3.
EthirajS. K.LevinthalD. (2004), “Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems,” Management Science, 50 (2), 159–73.
4.
GablerC. B.OgilvieJ. L.RappA.BachrachD. G. (2017), “Is There a Dark Side of Ambidexterity? Implications of Dueling Sales and Service Orientations,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (4), 379–92.
5.
Hennig-ThurauT.GwinnerK. P.GremlerD. D. (2002), “Understanding Relationship Marketing Outcomes: An Integration of Relational Benefits and Relationship Quality,” Journal of Service Research, 4 (3), 230–47.
6.
JasmandC.BlazevicV.De RuyterK. (2012), “Generating Sales While Providing Service: A Study of Customer Service Representatives’ Ambidextrous Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (1), 20–37.
7.
PansariA.KumarV. (2017), “Customer Engagement: The Construct, Antecedents, and Consequences,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (3), 294–311.
8.
RappA. A.BachrachD. G.FlahertyK. E.HughesD. E.SharmaA.VoorheesC. M. (2017), “The Role of the Sales-Service Interface and Ambidexterity in the Evolving Organization: A Multilevel Research Agenda,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (1), 59–75.
9.
ZhangJ. Z.Iv WatsonG. F.PalmatierR. W.DantR. P. (2016), “Dynamic Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (5), 53–75.
