While research on employee ambidexterity is growing, there is little investigation on what firms can do to enhance their competitiveness in this space. Leveraging a human resource lens, we advance a comprehensive model depicting three firm-level ambidexterities as key performance drivers that can help firms achieve bottom-line outcomes. Specifically, we focus on (1) ambidexterity in skill-enhancing practices (i.e., selection, training), which ensure employees have relevant service-sales knowledge, skills, and abilities; (2) ambidexterity in motivation-enhancing practices (i.e., metrics, incentives), which help motivate employees to perform service-sales activities; and (3) ambidexterity in opportunity-enhancing practices (i.e., data, tools use), which enable employees to perform service-sales activities. Our findings suggest that ambidextrous firms—or those that balance service- and sales-related elements when implementing their systems and processes—enjoy greater sales force and firm financial performance. Finally, we test boundary conditions for these relationships and find that competitive intensity enhances the positive effects of all ambidexterity constructs. We conclude with implications for theory and practice.
AndersonErinOliverRichard L. (1987), “Perspectives on Behavior-Based Versus Outcome-based Salesforce Control Systems,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (4), 76–88.
2.
AndersonC. JamesGerbingDavid W. (1988), “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach,” Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411–423.
3.
ArmstrongJ. ScottOvertonTerry S. (1977), “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3), 396–402.
4.
ArnoldJ. ToddFangEric E.PalmatierRobert W. (2011), “The Effects of Customer Acquisition and Retention Orientations on a Firm’s Radical and Incremental Innovation Performance,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (2), 234–251.
5.
BabakusEminCravensDavid W.GrantKenIngramThomas N.LaForgeRaymond W. (1996), “Investigating the Relationships among Sales, Management Control, Sales Territory Design, Salesperson Performance, and Sales Organization Effectiveness,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (4), 345–363.
6.
BaileyE. ElizabethHelfatConstance E. (2003), “External Management Succession, Human Capital, and Firm Performance: An Integrative Analysis,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 24 (4), 347–369.
7.
ChinW. WynneThatcherJason BennettWrightRyan T. (2012), “Assessing Common Method Bias: Problems with the ULMC Technique,” MIS Quarterly, 36 (3), 1003–1019.
8.
ChinW. WynneMarcolinBarbara L.NewstedPeter R. (2003), “A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study,” Information Systems Research, 14 (2), 189–217.
9.
ChurchillA. GilbertJrFordNeil M.HartleySteven W.WalkerOrville C.Jr. (1985), “The Determinants of Salesperson Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (22), 103–118.
10.
CronL. WilliamMarshallGreg W.SinghJagdipSpiroRosann L.SujanHarish (2005), “Salesperson Selection, Training, and Development: Trends, Implications, and Research Opportunities,” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 25 (2), 123–136.
11.
DeCarloE. ThomasLamSon K. (2015), “Identifying Effective Hunters and Farmers in the Salesforce: A Dispositional–Situational Framework,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44 (4), 1–25.
12.
DeciL. Edward (1971), “Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18 (1), 105–115.
13.
DuncanB. Robert (1976), “The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation”, in Management of Organization Design, KilmanR.PondyL.SlevinD., eds. New York: North Holland, 167–88.
14.
EvansG. Martin (1985), “A Monte Carlo Study of the Effects of Correlated Method Variance in Moderated Multiple Regression Analysis,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36 (3), 305–323.
15.
GablerB. ColinOgilvieJessica L.RappAdamBachrachDaniel G. (2017), “Is There a Dark Side of Ambidexterity? Implications of Dueling Sales and Service Orientations,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (4), 379–392.
16.
GatignonHubertXuerebJean-Marc (1997), “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (1) 77–90.
17.
GhoshalSumantraBartlettChristopher A. (1994), “Linking Organizational Context and Managerial Action: The Dimensions of Quality of Management,” Strategic Management Journal, 15 (S2), 91–112.
18.
GibsonB. CristinaBirkinshawJulian (2004), “The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity,” Academy of Management Journal, 47 (2), 209–226.
19.
GlynnS. MarkWoodsideArch G. (2012), Business-to-Business Marketing Management: Strategies, Cases and Solutions. Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
20.
GuptaK. AnilSmithKen G.ShalleyChristina E. (2006), “The Interplay between Exploration and Exploitation,” Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4), 693–706.
21.
HairF. JosephHultG. Tomas M.RingleChristian M.SarstedtMarkoThieleKai Oliver (2017), “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: A Comparative Evaluation of Composite-Based Structural Equation Modeling Methods,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (5), 616–632.
22.
HairF. JosephSarstedtMarkoRingleChristian M.MenaJeannette A. (2012), “An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing Research,” Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 40 (3), 414–433.
23.
HairF. JosephBlackW. C.BabinBarry J.AndersonRolph E. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Cranbury, NJ: Pearson Education.
24.
HelfatE. ConstanceMartinJeffrey A. (2015), “Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Review and Assessment of Managerial Impact on Strategic Change,” Journal of Management, 41 (5), 1281–1312.
25.
HouseJ. RobertRousseauDenise M.Thomas-HuntM. (1995), “The Third Paradigm: Meso Organizational Research Comes to Age,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 71–114.
JansenJ. P. JustinBoschFrans A. J. Van denVolberdaHenk W. (2005), “Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Ambidexterity: The Impact of Environmental and Organizational Antecedents,” Schmalenbach Business Review, 57 (4), 351–363.
28.
JasmandClaudiaBlazevicVeraRuyterKo de (2012), “Generating Sales While Providing Service: A Study of Customer Service Representatives’ Ambidextrous Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (1), 20–37.
29.
JaworskiJ. BernardKohliAjay K. (1993), “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (3), 53–70.
30.
JayachandranSatishSharmaSubhashKaufmanPeterRamanPushkala (2005), “The Role of Relational Information Processes and Technology Use in Customer Relationship Management,” Journal of Marketing, 69 (4), 177–192.
31.
JiangKaifengLepakDavid P.HuJiaBaerJudith C. (2012), “How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms,” Academy of Management Journal, 55 (6), 1264–1294.
32.
JunniPaulinaSaralaRiikka M.TarasVasTarbaShlomo Y. (2013), “Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” Academy of Management Perspectives, 27 (4), 299–312.
33.
KimYoungsangPloyhartRobert E. (2014), “The Effects of Staffing and Training on Firm Productivity and Profit Growth before, during, and after the Great Recession,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 99 (3), 361.
34.
KohliK. AjayJaworskiBernard J. (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,” Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.
LeeJu-YeonKozlenkovaIrina V.PalmatierRobert W. (2015), “Structural Marketing: Using Organizational Structure to Achieve Marketing Objectives,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), 73–99.
37.
LeeJu-YeonSridharShrihariHendersonConor M.PalmatierRobert W. (2014), “Effect of Customer-Centric Structure on Long-Term Financial Performance,” Marketing Science, 34 (2), 250–268.
38.
LepakP. DavidLiaoHuiChungYunhyungHardenErika E. (2006), “A Conceptual Review of Human Resource Management Systems in Strategic Human Resource Management Research,” in Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 25. Bingley, England: Emerald Group, 217–271.
39.
LevinthalA. DanielMarchJames G. (1993), “The Myopia of Learning,” Strategic Management Journal, 14 (S2), 95–112.
40.
LindellK. MichaelWhitneyDavid J. (2001), “Accounting for Common Method Variance in Cross-Sectional Research Designs,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1), 114–121.
41.
MacInnisJ. DeborahMoormanChristineJaworskiBernard J. (1991), “Enhancing and Measuring Consumers’ Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Information from Ads,” Journal of Marketing, 55 (4), 32–53.
42.
MarchG. James (1991), “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” Organization Science, 2 (1), 71–87.
NosellaAnnaCantarelloSilviaFilippiniRoberto (2012), “The Intellectual Structure of Organizational Ambidexterity: A Bibliographic Investigation into the State of the Art,” Strategic Organization, 10 (4), 450–465.
45.
O’ReillyCharles A., IIITushmanMichael L. (2013), “Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future,” Academy of Management Perspectives, 27 (4), 324–338.
46.
PanagopoulosG. NikolaosAvlonitisGeorge J. (2010), “Performance Implications of Sales Strategy: The Moderating Effects of Leadership and Environment,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (1), 46–57.
47.
PattersonPaulYuTingKimpakornNarumon (2014), “Killing Two Birds with One Stone: Cross-Selling during Service Delivery,” Journal of Business Research, 67 (9), 1944–1952.
48.
PloyhartE. RobertNybergAnthony J.ReillyGregMaltarichMark A. (2014), “Human Capital Is Dead; Long Live Human Capital Resources!” Journal of Management, 40 (2), 371–398.
49.
PodsakoffM. PhilipMacKenzieScott B.LeeJeong-YeonPodsakoffNathan P. (2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879.
50.
PullinsB. Ellen, (2001), “An Exploratory Investigation of the Relationship of Sales Force Compensation and Intrinsic Motivation,” Industrial Marketing Management, 30 (5), 403–413.
51.
RaischSebastianBirkinshawJulian (2008), “Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators,” Journal of Management, 34 (3), 375–409.
52.
RappAdamBachrachDaniel G.FlahertyKaren E.HughesDouglas E.SharmaArunVoorheesClay M. (2017), “The Role of the Sales-Service Interface and Ambidexterity in the Evolving Organization: A Multilevel Research Agenda,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (1), 59–75.
53.
RappAdamAhearneMichaelMathieuJohnSchillewaertNiels (2006), “The Impact of Knowledge and Empowerment on Working Smart and Working Hard: The Moderating Role of Experience,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23 (3), 279–293.
54.
ReinartzW. WernerHaenleinMichaelHenselerJörg (2009), “An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26 (4), 332–344.
55.
SabnisGauravChatterjeeSharmila C.GrewalRajdeepLilienGary L. (2013), “The Sales Lead Black Hole: On Sales Reps’ Follow-Up of Marketing Leads,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (1), 52–67.
56.
SpiroL. RosannRichGregory. A.StantonWilliam J. (2008), Management of a Sales Force, 12th ed. Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
57.
SiemsenEnnoRothAledaBalasubramanianSridhar (2008), “How Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability Drive Knowledge Sharing: The Constraining-Factor Model,” Journal of Operations Management, 26 (3), 426–445.
58.
SlaterF. StanleyNarverJohn C. (1994), “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?” Journal of Marketing, 58 (1), 46–55.
59.
SubramonyMahesh (2009), “A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Relationship between HRM Bundles and Firm Performance,” Human Resource Management, 48 (5), 745–768.
60.
Van der BorghMichelSchepersJeroen J. L. (2014), “Do Retailers Really Profit from Ambidextrous Managers? The Impact of Frontline Mechanisms on New and Existing Product Selling Performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 710–727.
61.
VerbekeWillemDietzBartVerwaalErnst (2011), “Drivers of Sales Performance: A Contemporary Meta-Analysis. Have Salespeople Become Knowledge Brokers?” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (3), 407–428.
62.
WalkerC. OrvilleJrChurchillGilbert A.JrFordNeil M. (1977), “Motivation and Performance in Industrial Selling: Present Knowledge and Needed Research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (2), 156–168.
63.
WangGuangpingDouWenyuZhouNan (2012), “The Interactive Effects of Sales Force Controls on Salespeople Behaviors and Customer Outcomes,” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 32 (2), 225–243.
64.
WernerfeltBirger (1995), “The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years After,” Strategic Management Journal, 16 (3), 171–174.
65.
YuTingPattersonPaul G.de RuyterKo (2015), “Converting Service Encounters into Cross-Selling Opportunities: Does Faith in Supervisor Ability Help or Hinder Service-Sales Ambidexterity?” European Journal of Marketing, 49(3/4), 491–511.
66.
YuTingPattersonPaul G.RuyterKo de (2013), “Achieving Service-Sales Ambidexterity,” Journal of Service Research, 16 (1), 52–66.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
