Two experimental studies reveal that customers’ reactions to different levels of recovery compensation differ between a recovery that occurs at the group level (such that every customer knows that every other affected customer receives the same compensation) and one that occurs at the individual level (such that the individual does not know whether and how much compensation other affected customers receive). In both cases, recovery compensation exhibits diminishing returns on compensation size in terms of recovery satisfaction. However, at the group level, the rate at which the returns on compensation diminish is greater and satisfaction reaches a plateau at lower compensation levels than at the individual level. The salient social comparison made during a group service recovery (GSR), as evidenced by the mediating role of distributive justice, explains these effects. Finally, we note that at midrange compensation levels, GSR and individual service recovery did not lead to different levels of recovery satisfaction, suggesting a zone of tolerance or indifference at these levels. Further, our findings yield important managerial implications for the efficient allocation of service recovery resources after a group service failure.
AlbrechtArne K.WalshGianfrancoBeattySharon E. (2017), “Perceptions of Group versus Individual Service Failures and Their Effects on Customer Outcomes: The Role of Attributions and Customer Entitlement,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (2), 188–203.
2.
ArgoJennifer J.DahlDarren W.ManchandaRajesh V. (2005), “The Influence of a Mere Social Presence in a Retail Context,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (2), 207–212.
BonifieldCarolynColeCatherine A. (2008), “Better Him than Me: Social Comparison Theory and Service Recovery,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (4), 565–577.
5.
Cambra-FierroJesusMeleroIguacelJavier SeseF. (2015), “Managing Complaints to Improve Customer Profitability,” Journal of Retailing, 91 (1), 109–124.
6.
ChoiSunmeeMattilaAnna S. (2008), “Perceived Controllability and Service Expectations: Influences on Customer Reactions Following Service Failure,” Journal of Business Research, 61 (1), 24–30.
7.
CollieThereseBradleyGrahamSparksBeverley A. (2002), “Fair Process Revisited: Differential Effects of Interactional and Procedural Justice in the Presence of Social Comparison Information,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38 (6), 545–555.
8.
DeightonJohnHendersonCaroline M.NeslinScott A. (1994), “The Effects of Advertising on Brand Switching and Repeat Purchasing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (1), 28–43.
9.
De RuyterKoWetzelsMartin (2000), “Customer Equity Considerations in Service Recovery: A Cross-Industry Perspective,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11 (1), 91–108.
10.
DiLallaDavid L.DollingerStephen J. (2006), “Cleaning Up Data and Running Preliminary Analyses,” in The Psychology Research Handbook, LeongFrederick T. L.AustinJames T., eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 241–254.
11.
DuJiangangFanXiuchengFengTianjun (2014), “Group Emotional Contagion and Complaint Intentions in Group Service Failure: The Role of Group Size and Group Familiarity,” Journal of Service Research, 17 (3), 326–338.
12.
EstelamiHooman (2000), “Competitive and Procedural Determinants of Delight and Disappointment in Consumer Complaint Outcomes,” Journal of Service Research, 2 (3), 285–300.
13.
FestingerLeon (1954), “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes,” Human Relations, 7 (2), 117–140.
14.
FornellClaesLarckerDavid F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.
15.
GelbrichKatjaGäthkeJanaGrégoireYany (2016), “How a Firm’s Best versus Normal Customers React to Compensation after a Service Failure,” Journal of Business Research, 69 (10), 4331–4339.
16.
GelbrichKatjaGäthkeJanaGrégoireYany (2015), “How Much Compensation Should a Firm Offer for a Flawed Service? An Examination of the Nonlinear Effects of Compensation on Satisfaction,” Journal of Service Research, 18 (1), 107–123.
17.
GelbrichKatjaRoschkHolger (2011), “A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses,” Journal of Service Research, 14 (1), 24–43.
18.
GelbrichKatja (2010), “Anger, Frustration, and Helplessness after Service Failure: Coping Strategies and Effective Informational Support,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38 (5), 567–585.
19.
GerberJ. P.WheelerLaddSulsJerry (2018), “A Social Comparison Theory Meta-Analysis 60+ Years On,” Psychological Bulletin, 144 (2), 177–197.
20.
GöritzAnja S. (2004), “Recruitment for Online Access Panels,” International Journal of Market Research, 46 (4), 411–425.
21.
GrewalDhruvRoggeveenAnne L.TsirosMichael (2008), “The Effect of Compensation on Repurchase Intentions in Service Recovery,” Journal of Retailing, 84 (4), 424–434.
22.
HamiltonRebecca W.RustRoland T.WedelMichelDevChekitan S. (2017), “Return on Service Amenities,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (1), 96–110.
23.
HessRonald L.JrGanesanShankarKleinNoreen M. (2003), “Service Failure and Recovery: The Impact of Relationship Factors on Customer Satisfaction,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (2), 127–145.
24.
HogreveJensBilsteinNicolaMandlLeonhard (2017), “Unveiling the Recovery Time Zone of Tolerance: When Time Matters in Service Recovery,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (6), 866–883.
25.
HomburgChristianMüllerMichaelKlarmannMartin (2011), “When Should the Customer Really Be King? On the Optimum Level of Salesperson Customer Orientation in Sales Encounters,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (2), 55–74.
26.
JohnstonRobert (1995), “The Zone of Tolerance: Exploring the Relationship between Service Transactions and Satisfaction with the Overall Service,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6 (2), 46–61.
27.
LindellMichael K.WhitneyDavid J. (2001), “Accounting for Common Method Variance in Cross-Sectional Research Designs,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1), 114–121.
28.
MattilaAnna S.PattersonPaul G. (2004), “The Impact of Culture on Consumers’ Perceptions of Service Recovery Efforts,” Journal of Retailing, 80 (3), 196–206.
29.
MattilaAnna S. (2001), “The Effectiveness of Service Recovery in a Multi-Industry Setting,” Journal of Services Marketing, 15 (7), 583–596.
30.
MaxhamJames G.NetemeyerRichard G. (2002), “A Longitudinal Study of Complaining Customers’ Evaluations of Multiple Service Failures and Recovery Efforts,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (4), 57–71.
31.
McColl-KennedyJanet R.DausCatherine S.SparksBeverley A. (2003), “The Role of Gender in Reactions to Service Failure and Recovery,” Journal of Service Research, 6 (1), 66–82.
32.
MuthénLinda K.MuthénBengt O. (1998-2017), Mplus User’s Guide, 8th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
33.
NamSungjoonManchandaPuneetChintaguntaPradeep K. (2010), “The Effect of Signal Quality and Contiguous Word of Mouth on Customer Acquisition for a Video-on-Demand Service,” Marketing Science, 29 (4), 690–700.
34.
OliverRichard L.SwanJohn E. (1989), “Consumer Perceptions of Interpersonal Equity and Satisfaction in Transactions: A Field Survey Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (2), 21–35.
35.
PodsakoffPhilip M.MacKenzieScott B.LeeJeong-YeonPodsakoffNathan P. (2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903.
36.
RafteryAdrian E. (1995), “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research [with Discussion],” in Sociological Methodology 1995, MarsdenPeter V., ed. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 111–195.
37.
RoschkHolgerGelbrichKatja (2017), “Compensation Revisited,” Journal of Service Research, 20 (4), 393–408.
38.
RyuEhriCheongJeewon (2017), “Comparing Indirect Effects in Different Groups in Single-Group and Multi-Group Structural Equation Models,” Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 747. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00747
39.
SetaJohn J.SetaCatherine E. (1992), “Personal Equity-Comparison Theory: An Analysis of Value and the Generation of Compensatory and Noncompensatory Expectancies,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13 (1), 47–66.
40.
SmithAmy K.BoltonRuth N.WagnerJanet (1999), “A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (3), 356–372.
41.
StrickhouserJason E.ZellEthan (2015), “Self-Evaluative Effects of Dimensional and Social Comparison,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59 (1), 60–66.
42.
TaxStephen S.BrownStephen W.ChandrashekaranMurali (1998), “Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (2), 60–76.
43.
van den BosKeesLindE. A.VermuntRielWilkeHenk A. M. (1997), “How Do I Judge My Outcome When I Do Not Know the Outcome of Others? The Psychology of the Fair Process Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 (5), 1034–1046.
44.
ZhouYuanyuanHuangMinxueTsangAlex S.ZhouNan (2013), “Recovery Strategy for Group Service Failures: The Interaction Effects between Recovery Modes and Recovery Dimensions,” European Journal of Marketing, 47 (8), 1133–1156.
45.
ZhouYuanyuanTsangAlex S. L.HuangMinxueZhouNan (2014), “Group Service Recovery Strategies Effectiveness: The Moderating Effects of Group Size and Relational Distance,” Journal of Business Research, 67 (11), 2480–2485.
46.
ZeithamlValarie A.BerryLeonard L.ParasuramanA. (1993), “The Nature and Determinants of Customer Expectations of Service,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21 (1), 1–12.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
