This article examines how compensation type and failure type explain the recovery effect of compensation, using a meta-analysis (Study 1) and an experiment (Study 2). Drawing on resource exchange theory, we propose new classifications for both compensation and failure type and find three major results. First, consistent with our matching hypothesis, the strongest recovery effect is generally observed when compensation represents a resource similar to the failure it is supposed to offset, that is, immediate monetary compensation for a monetary failure, exchange for a flawed product, reperformance for a failed service, and psychological compensation for lack of attention. Surprisingly, lack of attention may also be rectified by the other compensation types. Second, consistent with our intertemporal choice hypothesis, immediate monetary compensation is generally more effective than delayed monetary compensation. Yet, this effect also varies with failure type. Third, resource-based classifications explain the recovery effect of compensation better than current classifications of compensation and failure type. As a theoretical contribution, the resource-based classifications help to explain the fluctuating effect sizes of compensation reported in prior research. From a managerial point of view, practitioners can choose the appropriate compensation type for a failure, one that repays in kind what customers have lost. As a result, companies achieve stronger recovery effects without additional costs.
AdamsStacy J. (1965), “Inequity in Social Exchange,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, LeonardBerkowitz, ed. New York, NY: Academic Press, 267–299.
2.
AkaikeHirotugu (1987), “Factor Analysis and AIC,”Psychometrika, 52 (3), 317–332.
3.
BitnerMary J.BoomsBernard H.TetreaultMary S. (1990), “The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents,”Journal of Marketing, 54 (January), 71–84.
4.
BlodgettJeffrey G.HillDonna J.TaxStephen S. (1997), “The Effects of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Postcomplaint Behavior,”Journal of Retailing, 73 (2), 185–210.
5.
BonifieldCarolynColeCatherine A. (2008), “Better Him than Me: Social Comparison Theory and Service Recovery,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (Winter), 565–577.
6.
BoshoffChristo (1997), “An Experimental Study of Service Recovery Options,”International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8 (2), 110–130.
7.
BrinbergDavidWoodRonald (1983), “A Resource Exchange Theory Analysis of Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (3), 330–338.
8.
ChanElaineMukhopadhyayAnirban (2010), “When Choosing Makes a Good Thing Better: Temporal Variations in the Valuation of Hedonic Consumption,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (June), 497–507.
9.
CohenJacob (1988), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
CropanzanoRusselByrneZinta S.BobocelD. R.RuppDeborah E. (2001), “Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice,”Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58 (2001), 164–209.
11.
DavidowMoshe (2003), “Organizational Responses to Customer Complaints: What Works and what Doesn't,”Journal of Service Research, 5 (February), 225–250.
12.
DonnenwerthGregory V.FoaUriel G. (1974), “Effect of Resource Class on Retaliation to Injustice in Interpersonal Exchange,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29 (6), 785–793.
13.
EisendMartin (2009), “A Meta-Analysis of Humor in Advertising,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37 (Summer), 191–203.
14.
EstelamiHooman (2000), “Competitive and Procedural Determinants of Delight and Disappointment in Consumer Complaint Outcomes,”Journal of Service Research, 2 (February), 285–300.
15.
FehrRyanGelfandMichele J. (2010), “When Apologies Work: How matching Apology Components to Victims’ Self-construals Facilitates Forgiveness,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113 (1), 37–50.
16.
FoaEdna B.FoaUriel G. (1976), “Ressource Theory of Social Exchange,” in Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology, John W. Thibaut, Janet T. Spence, and Robert C. Carson, eds.Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 99–134.
17.
FoaUriel G.FoaEdna B. (1974), Societal Structures of the Mind. Springfield, IL: Charles CThomas.
18.
FolkesValerie S.KoletskySusanGrahamJohn L. (1987), “A Field Study of Causal Inferences and Consumer Reaction: The View from the Airport,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (4), 534–539.
19.
GarrettDennis E. (1999), “The Effectiveness of Compensation Given to Complaining Consumers: Is More Better?”Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 12, 26–34.
20.
GelbrichKatja (2010), “Anger, Frustration, and Helplessness After Service Failure: Coping Strategies and Effective Informational Support,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38 (2010), 567–585.
21.
GelbrichKatjaRoschkHolger (2011a), “A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses,”Journal of Service Research, 14 (February), 24–43.
22.
GelbrichKatjaRoschkHolger (2011b), “Do Complainants Appreciate Overcompensation? A Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Simple Compensation Vs. Overcompensation on Post-Complaint Satisfaction,”Marketing Letters, 22 (1), 31–47.
23.
GeyskensIngeSteenkampJan-Benedict E. M.KumarNirmalya (1999), “A Meta-Analysis of Satisfaction in Marketing Channel Relationships,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (May), 223–238.
24.
GillyMary C.GelbBetsy D. (1982), “Post-Purchase Consumer Processes and the Complaining Consumer,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (December), 323–328.
25.
GlassGene V.McGawBerrySmithMary L. (1981), Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
GouldnerAlvin W. (1960), “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement,”American Sociological Review, 25 (2), 161–178.
27.
GrewalDhruvRoggeveenAnne L.TsirosMichael (2008), “The Effect of Compensation on Repurchase Intentions in Service Recovery,”Journal of Retailing, 84 (4), 424–434.
28.
HessRonald L.GanesanShankarKleinNoreen M. (2003), “Service Failure and Recovery: The Impact of Relationship Factors on Customer Satisfaction,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (Spring), 127–145.
29.
HunterJohn E.SchmidtFrank L. (2004), Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
HunterJohn E.JacksonGregg G. (1982), Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
KelleyScott W.HoffmanK. D.DavisMark A. (1993), “A Typology of Retail Failures and Recoveries,”Journal of Retailing, 69 (4), 429–452.
32.
KimNaminUlgadoFrancis M. (2012), “The Effect of On-the-spot versus Delayed Compensation: The Moderating Role of Failure Severity,”Journal of Services Marketing, 26 (3), 158–167.
33.
KnoxGeorgeOestRutger van (2012), “Customer Complaints and Lifetime Value,”working paper (accessed August 30, 2013), [available at:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1427265.]
34.
LeeEun-JungParkJungKun (2010), “Service Failures in Online Double Deviation Scenarios: Justice Theory Approach,”Managing Service Quality, 20 (1), 46–69.
35.
LiaoHui (2007), “Do it Right this Time: The Role of Employee Service Recovery Performance in Customer-Perceived Justice and Customer Loyalty After Service Failures,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (2), 475–489.
36.
MattilaAnna S.PattersonPaul G. (2004), “Service Recovery and Fairness Perceptions in Collectivist and Individualist Contexts,”Journal of Service Research, 6 (May), 336–346.
37.
MaxhamIIIJamesG.NetemeyerRichard G. (2002a), “Modeling Customer Perceptions of Complaint Handling Over Time: The Effects of Perceived Justice on Satisfaction and Intent,”Journal of Retailing, 78 (4), 239–252.
38.
MaxhamIIIJamesG.NetemeyerRichard G. (2002b), “A Longitudinal Study of Complaining Custorners' Evaluations of Multiple Service Failures and Recovery Efforts,”Journal of Marketing, 66 (October), 57–71.
39.
NooneBreffni M.LeeChung H. (2011), “Hotel Overbooking: The Effect of Overcompensation on Customers’ Reactions to Denied Service,”Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 35 (3), 334–357.
40.
OrsingherChiaraValentiniSaraAngelisMatteo de (2010), “A Meta-Analysis of Satisfaction with Complaint Handling in Services,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38 (Spring), 169–186.
41.
PetersonRobert A.BrownSteven P. (2005), “On the use of Beta Coefficients in Meta-Analysis,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (1), 175–181.
42.
PyoneJin S.IsenAlice M. (2011), “Positive Affect, Intertemporal Choice, and Levels of Thinking: Increasing Consumers' Willingness to Wait,”Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (June), 532–543.
43.
RoehmMichelle L.RoehmHarper A. (2011), “The Influence of Redemption Time Frame on Responses to Incentives,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (3), 363–375.
44.
RoschkHolgerKaiserSusanne (2013), “The Nature of an Apology: An Experimental Study on how to Apologize after a Service Failure,”Marketing Letters, 24 (3), 293–309.
45.
RosenthalRobert (1979), “The 'File-Drawer Problem' and Tolerance for Null Results,”Psychological Bulletin, 86 (3), 638–641.
46.
RustRoland T.CooilBruce (1994), “Reliability Measures for Qualitative Data: Theory and Implications,”Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (February), 1–14.
47.
SamuelsonPaul A. (1937), “A Note on Measurement of Utility,”The Review of Economic Studies, 4 (February), 155–161.
48.
SchmidtFrank L.HunterJohn E. (1999), “Comparison of Three Meta-Analysis Methods Revisited: An Analysis of Johnson, Mullen, and Salas (1995),”Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (1), 144–148.
49.
ShroutPatrick E.FleissJoseph L. (1979), “Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability,”Psychological Bulletin, 86 (2), 420–428.
50.
SmithAmy K.BoltonRuth N.WagnerJanet (1999), “A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (August), 356–372.
51.
SparksBeverly A.McColl-KennedyJanet R. (2001), “Justice Strategy Options for Increased Customer Satisfaction in a Services Recovery Setting,”Journal of Business Research, 54 (3), 209–218.
52.
TeichmanMeirFoaUriel G. (1975), “Effect of Resources Similarity on Satisfaction with Exchange,”Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 3 (2), 213–224.
53.
WalsterElaineBerscheidEllenWalsterG. W. (1973), “New Directions in Equity Research,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25 (2), 151–176.
54.
WeaverKimberleeGarciaStephen M.SchwarzNorbert (2012), “The Presenter's Paradox,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (3), 445-460.
55.
WebsterCynthiaSundaramD. S. (1998), “Service Consumption Criticality in Failure Recovery,”Journal of Business Research, 41 (2), 153–159.
56.
WhatleyMark A.WebsterJ. M.SmithRichard H.RhodesAdele (1995), “The Effect of a Favor on Public and Private Compliance: How Internalized is the Norm of Reciprocity?”Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21 (3), 251–259.
57.
WirtzJochenMattilaAnna S. (2004), “Consumer Responses to Compensation, Speed of Recovery and Apology After a Service Failure,”International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15 (2), 150–166.
58.
ZaubermanGal (2003), “The Intertemporal Dynamics of Consumer Lock-in,”Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (3), 405–419.
59.
ZaubermanGalKimB. K.MalkocSelin A.BettmanJames R. (2009), “Discounting Time and Time Discounting: Subjective Time Perception and Intertemporal Preferences,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (August), 543–556.
60.
ZeithamlValarie A.ParasuramanA.BerryLeonard L. (1985), “Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 49 (Spring), 33–46.
61.
ZhuZhenSivakumarK.ParasuramanA. (2004), “A Mathematical Model of Service Failure and Recovery Strategies,”Decision Sciences, 35 (Summer), 493–525.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
