The authors investigate how perceived customer value can be translated into economic returns for online social network sites (SNS). The (joint) impact of two value propositions, social capital and entitativity, is assessed. Perceived economic and social customer value are investigated as outcomes of these propositions. Two studies reveal that entitativity and social capital impact members’ willingness to pay (WtP) membership fees, either directly or indirectly. Moreover, the predictive ability of perceived economic and social customer value regarding WtP depends on the type of membership and the type of social network. SNS providers are advised to emphasize the benefits their users actually take advantage of. While for professional SNS, it seems advisable to stress both social and economic value, particularly for premium members, in socially oriented SNS premium members seem to be driven more by social value. Other theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
AdlerPaul S.KwonSeok-Woo (2002), “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concepts,” The Academy of Management Review, 27 (1), 17–40.
2.
AshforthBlake E.MaelFred (1989), “Social Identity Theory and the Organization,” The Academy of Management Review, 14 (1), 20–39.
3.
BalasubramanianSridharMahajanVijay (2001), “The Economic Leverage of the Virtual Community,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5 (3), 103–138.
4.
BhattacharyaC. B. (1998), “When Customers Are Members: Customer Retention in Paid Membership Contexts,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26 (1), 31–44.
5.
BolinoMark C.TurnleyWilliam H.BloodgoodJames M. (2002), “Citizenship Behavior and the Creation of Social Capital in Organizations,” The Academy of Management Review, 27 (4), 505–522.
6.
CampbellDonald T. (1958), “Common Fate, Similarity, and Other Indices of the Status of Aggregates of Persons as Social Entities,” Behavioral Science, 3 (1), 14–25.
7.
CastanoEmanueleYzerbytVincentBourguignonDavid (2003), “We Are One and I Like It: The Impact of Ingroup Entitativity on Ingroup Identification,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 735–754.
8.
CastanoEmanueleYzerbytVincentPaladinoMaria-PaolaSacchiSimona (2002), “I Belong Therefore I Exist: Ingroup Identification, Ingroup Entitativity, and Ingroup Bias,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28 (2), 135–143.
9.
ChiuChao-MinHsuMeng-HsiangWangEric T. G. (2006), “Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories,” Decision Support Systems, 42, 1872–1888.
10.
ColemanJames S. (1988), “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure), 95–120.
CorrellJoshuaParkBernadette (2005), “A Model of the Ingroup as a Social Resource,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9 (4), 341–359.
13.
DholakiaUtpal M.BlazevicVeraWiertzCarolineAlgesheimerRene (2009), “Communal Service Delivery: How Customers Benefit from Participation in Firm-Hosted Virtual P3 Communities,” Journal of Service Research, 12 (2), 208–226.
14.
DholakiaUtpal M.BagozziRichard P.PearoLisa Klein (2004), “A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-based Virtual Communities,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–263.
15.
EndersAlbrechtHungenbergHaraldDenkerHans-PeterMauchSebastian (2008), “The Long Tail of Social Networking. Revenue Models of Social Networking Sites,” European Management Journal, 26(3), 199–211.
16.
FalkTomasHammerschmidtMaikSchepersJeroen J.L. (2010), “The Service Quality-Satisfaction Link Revisited: Exploring Asymmetries and Dynamics,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 288–302.
17.
GassenheimerJule B.HoustonFranklin S.DavisCharlene J. (1998), “The Role of Economic Value, Social Value, and Perceptions of Fairness in Interorganizational Relationship Retention Decisions,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26 (4), 322–337.
18.
GötzOliverLiehr-GobbersKerstinKrafftManfred (2010), “Evaluation of Structural Equation Models Using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach,” in Handbook of Partial Least Squares Concepts, Methods and Applications, Vincenzo Esposito VinziChinWynne W.Jörg HenselerWang Huiwen, eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 691–710.
19.
GouldnerAlvin W. (1960), “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement,” American Sociological Review, 25 (2), 161–178.
20.
GraysonKent (2007), “Friendship Versus Business in Marketing Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (October), 121–139.
21.
HamiltonDavid L.ShermanSteven J.CastelliLuigi (2002), “A Group By Any Other Name – The Role of Entitativity in Group Perception,” European Review of Social Psychology, 12 (1), 139–166.
22.
HenselerChristian M. RingleSinkovicsRudolf R. (2009), “The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing,” Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–319.
23.
HoggMichael A.ShermanDavid K.DierselhuisJoelMaitnerAngela T.MoffittGraham (2007), “Uncertainty, Entitativity, and Group Identification,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43 (1), 135–142.
24.
IgarashiTasukuKashimaYoshihisa (2011), “Perceived Entitativity of Social Networks,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1048–1058.
25.
JansLiesePostmesTomZeeKaren I. Van der (2011), “The Induction of Shared Identity: The Positive Role of Individual Distinctiveness for Groups,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37 (8), 1130–1141.
26.
LickelBrianHamiltonDavid L.WieczorkowskaGrazynaLewisAmyShermanSteven J.Neville UhlesA. (2000), “Varieties of Groups and the Perception of Group Entitativity,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (2), 223–246.
27.
MathwickCharlaWiertzCarolinede RuyterKo (2008), “Social Capital Production in a Virtual P3 Community,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 832–849.
NahapietJanineGhoshalSumantra (1998), “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 242–266.
30.
NoortGuda vanAntheunisMarjolijn L.ReijmersdalEva A. van (2012), “Social Connections and the Persuasiveness of Viral Campaigns in Social Network Sites: Persuasive Intent as the Underlying Mechanism,” Journal of Marketing Communications, 18 (1), 39–53.
31.
PauwelsKoenAllen WeissA. (2008), “Moving from Free to Fee: How Online Firms Market to Change Their Business Model Successfully,” Journal of Marketing, 72 (May), 14–31.
32.
RingleChristian MWendeSvenWillAlexander (2005), SmartPLS 2.0., Hamburg. [available at http://www.smartpls.de].
33.
RitzerGeorgeJurgensonNathan (2010), “Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital ‘Prosumer’,” Journal of Consumer Culture, 10 (1), 13–36.
34.
RyuGangseogFeickLawrence (2007), “A Penny for Your Thoughts: Referral Reward Programs and Referral Likelihood,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (January), 84–94.
35.
ShermanSteven J.HamiltonDavid L.LewisAmy C. (1999), “Perceived Entitativity and the Social Identity Value of Group Memberships,” in Social Identity and Social Cognition, AbramsDominicHoggMichael A., eds., 80–110. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
36.
StenstromDouglas M.LickelBrianDensonThomas F.MillerNorman (2008), “The Roles of Ingroup Identification and Outgroup Entitativity in Intergroup Retribution,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1570–1582.
37.
TrusovMichaelBucklinRandolph E.PauwelsKoen (2009), “Effects of Word-of-Mouth Versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (September), 80–102.
38.
UzziBrian (1999), “Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing,” American Sociological Review, 64 (4), 481–505.
WangCheng LuYeLi RichardZhangYueNguyenDato-Dao (2005), “Subscription to Fee-Based Online Services: What Makes Consumer Pay for Online Content?,” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6 (4), 304–311.
41.
WangYouchengFesenmaierDaniel R. (2004), “Towards Understanding Members’ General Participation in and Active Contribution to an Online Travel Community,” Tourism Management, 25(6), 709–722.
42.
WaskoMolly McLureFarajSamer (2005), “Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice,” MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 35–57.
43.
YzerbytVincentCastanoEmanueleLeyensJacques-PhilippePaladinoMaria-Paola (2000), “The Primacy of the Ingroup: The Interplay of Entitativity and Identification,” European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 257–295.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
