Does technology-enablement impact the ability of a service system to co-create value? In this study, we assess and compare the relative importance of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and human relationships in service systems, by drawing on findings from a multiple case study in the consulting industry and subsequent analysis through a sociotechnical connectivity lens. We present a theoretical model and propositions which indicate that successful technology-enabled value co-creation is contingent upon the quantity and quality of interpersonal relationships, or social connectivity, between humans that interact and exchange resources by means of ICT. Our findings indicate that technology-enablement in service systems does not, in and of itself, influence human behavior, goals, or motivation regarding the value co-creation process, and argue that the ability of these service systems to co-create value is contingent on the levels of social connectivity between its human entities, more so than ICTs that enable the process. The ability to manage social connectivity therefore represents a prerequisite for the successful co-creation of value in technology-enabled environments, and we provide guidelines that help managing social connectivity on requisite levels.
AngwinDuncanVaaraEero, eds. (2005), “Connectivity in Merging Organizations: Beyond Traditional Cultural Perspectives,” Organization Studies, 26 (10), 1445–1453.
2.
BansalHarvir S.VoyerPeter A. (2000), “Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Services Purchase Decision Context,” Journal of Service Research, 3 (2), 166–177.
3.
BaymNancy K.ZhangYan BingLinMei-Chen (2004), “Social Interactions Across Media: Interpersonal Communication on the Internet, Telephone and Face-to-Face,” New Media Society, 6 (3), 299–318.
4.
BitnerMary JoZeithamlValarie A.GremlerDwayne D. (2010), “Technology’s Impact on the Gaps Model of Service Quality,” in Handbook of Service Science, Paul P. MaglioCheryl A. KieliszewskiJim Spohrer, eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 197–218.
5.
BitnerMary JoOstromAmy L.MeuterMatthew L. (2002), “Implementing Successful Self-Service Technologies,” Academy of Management Executive, 16 (4), 96–109.
6.
BitnerMary JoBrownStephen W.MeuterMatthew L. (2000), “Technology Infusion in Service Encounters,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (1), 138–149.
7.
BitnerMary Jo (1990), “Evaluating Service Encounters: The Effects of Personal Surroundings and Employee Responses,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 69–82.
8.
BreidbachChristoph F. (2010), “Success in Distributed Service Engineering: Is Connectivity The New Prerequisite for Value Co-Creation?” Proceedings of the Art and Science of Service Conference, Madrid, Spain.
9.
CarlsonJohn R.ZmudRobert W. (1999), “Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions,” Academy of Management Journal, 42 (2), 153–170.
10.
CartwrightPhillip A. (2002), “Only Converge: Networks and Connectivity in the Information Economy,” Business Strategy Review, 13 (2), 59–64.
11.
ChesbroughHenrySpohrerJim (2006), “A Research Manifesto for Services Science,” Communications of the ACM, 49 (7), 35–40.
12.
ColquittJason A.Zapata-PhelanCindy P. (2007), “Trends in Theory Building and Theory Testing: A Five-Decade Study of the Academy of Management Journal,” Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6), 1281–1303.
13.
CovielloNicole E. (2005), “Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques in Network Analysis,” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8 (1), 39–60.
14.
DaftRichard L.LengelRobert H. (1986), “Organisational Information Requirements, Media Richness, and Structural Design,” Managment Science, 32 (5), 554–571.
15.
DavisMark M.SpohrerJim C.MaglioPaul P. (2011), “Guest Editorial: How Technology is Changing the Design and Delivery of Services,” Operations Management Research, 4 (1-2), 1–5.
16.
EdvardssonBoTronvollBårdGruberThorsten (2011), “Expanding Understanding of Service Exchange and Value Co-Creation: A Social Construction Approach,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (2), 327–339.
17.
EisenhardtKathleen M.GraebnerMelissa E. (2007), “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges,” Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1), 25–32.
18.
EisenhardtKathleen M. (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532–551.
19.
FroehleCraig M. (2006), “Service Personnel, Technology, and Their Interaction in Influencing Customer Satisfaction,” Decision Sciences, 37 (1), 5–36.
20.
GadreyJeanGalloujFaiz, eds. (2002), Productivity, Innovation and Knowledge in Services: New Economic and Socio Economic Approaches. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
21.
GiddensAnthony (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
22.
GlücklerJohannesHammerIngmar (2011), “A Pragmatic Service Typology: Capturing the Distinctive Dynamics of Services in Time and Space,” The Service Industries Journal, 31 (6), 941–947.
23.
HarrisLloyd C.OgbonnaEmmanuel (2008), “The Dynamics Underlying Service Firm-Customer Relationships: Insights From a Study of English Premier League Soccer Fans,” Journal of Service Research, 10 (4), 382–399.
24.
HealyMarilynPerryChad (2000), “Comprehensive Criteria to Judge Validity and Reliability of Qualitative Research within the Realism Paradigm,” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3 (3), 118–126.
25.
HeinonenKristinaStrandvikToreMickelssonKarl-JacobEdvardssonBo SundstromErikAndersonPer (2010), “A Customer-Dominant Logic of Service,” Journal of Service Management, 21 (4), 531–548.
26.
KanterRosabeth M. (1999), “Change is Everyone’s Job: Managing the Extended Enterprise in a Globally Connected World,” Organizational Dynamics, 28 (1), 7–23.
27.
KolbDarl G. (2008), “Exploring the Metaphor of Connectivity: Attributes, Dimensions and Duality,” Organization Studies, 29 (1), 127–144.
28.
KolbDarl G.CollinsPaul D.LindAlan (2008), “Requisite Connectivity: Finding Flow in a Not-So-Flat World,” Organizational Dynamics, 37 (2), 181–189.
29.
LeeSungjooParkYongtae (2009), “The Classification and Strategic Management of Services in E-Commerce: Development of Service Taxonomy Based on Customer Perception,” Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (6), 9618–9624.
30.
Leonard-BartonDorothy (1990), “A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites,” Organisation Science, 1 (3), 248–267.
31.
LuschRobert F.VargoStephen L.TanniruMohan (2010), “Service, Value Networks and Learning,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38 (1), 19–31.
32.
MaglioPaul P.SpohrerJim (2008), “Fundamentals of Service Science,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (1), 18–20.
33.
MakaremSuzanne C.MudambiSusan M.PodoshenJeffrey S. (2009), “Satisfaction in Technology-Enabled Service Encounters,” Journal of Services Marketing, 23 (3), 134–144.
MillsPeter K.MarguilesNewton (1980), “Toward a Core Typology of Service Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 5 (2), 255–265.
36.
MurphyPeter (2007), “You Are Wasting My Time: Why Limits on Connectivity are Essential for Economies of Creativity,” University of Auckland Business Review, 9 (2), 17–26.
37.
NaisbittJohn (1982), Megatrends. New York, NY: Warner Books.
38.
NeuWayne A.BrownStephen W. (2005), “Forming Successful Business-to-Business Services in Goods-Dominant Firms,” Journal of Service Research, 8 (3), 3–17.
39.
O'SullivanPatrick (2000), “What You Don't Know Won't Hurt Me: Impression Management Functions of Communication Channels in Relationships,” Human Communication Research, 26 (3), 403–431.
40.
OstromAmy L.BitnerMary JoBrownStephen W.BurkhardKevin A.GoulMichaelSmith-DanielsVickiDemirkanHalukRabinovichElliot (2010), “Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of Service,” Journal of Service Research, 13 (1), 4–36.
41.
PayneAdrian F.StorbackaKajFrowPennie (2008), “Managing the Co-Creation of Value,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 83–96.
42.
PerryChad (1998), “Processes of a Case Study Methodology for Postgraduate Research in Marketing,” European Journal of Marketing, 32(9/10), 785–802.
43.
PrahaladC. K.RamaswamyVenkat (2004), The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value with Customers. Boston, MA: HBS Press.
44.
Quan-HaaseAnabelWellmanBarry (2005), “Hyperconnected Net Work: Computer-Mediated Community in a High-Tech Organization,” in The Corporation as a Collaborative Community: Reconstruction Trust in the Knowledge Economy, Charles HeckscherPaul S. Adler, eds. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 281–333.
45.
RajArunSambamurthyVallabh (2006), “The Growth of Interest in Services Management: Opportunities for Information Systems Scholars,” Information Systems Research, 14 (4), 327–331
46.
RiemerKaiFiliusStefanie (2009), “Contextualizing Media Choice using Genre Analysis,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2, 1–13.
47.
RustRoland T.MiuCarol (2006), “What Academic Research Tells us About Service,” Communications of the ACM, 49 (7), 49–54.
48.
SalomannHaraldKolbeLutzBrennerWalter (2006), “Self-Services in Customer Relationships: Balancing High-Tech and High-Touch Today and Tomorrow,” e-Service Journal, 4 (2), 65–84.
49.
SchmidtJeffrey B.Montoya-WeissMitzi M.MasseyAnne P. (2001), “New Product Development Decision Making Effectiveness: Comparing Individuals, Face-to-Face Teams, and Virtual Teams,” Decision Sciences, 32 (4), 575–600.
50.
SpohrerJimMaglioPaul P. (2010), “Toward a Science of Service Systems: Value and Symbols,” in Handbook of Service Science, P. MaglioC. A. KieliszewskiJ. Spohrer, eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 157–193.
51.
VargoStephen L.MaglioPaul P.AkakaMelissa A. (2008), “On Value and Value Co-Creation: A Service Systems and Service Logic Perspective,” European Management Journal, 26 (3), 145–152.
52.
VargoStephen L. (2010), “Advancing Service Science with Service-dominant Logic,” in MaglioPaul P.KieliszewskiCheryl A.SpohrerJim (Eds.), Handbook of Service Science (pp. 133–156). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
53.
VargoStephen L.LuschRobert F. (2004), “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 1–17.
WalkerRhett H.JohnsonLester W. (2004), “Managing Technology-Enabled Service Innovations,” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 4 (6), 561–574.
56.
WaltherJoseph B. (1995), “Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations Over Time,” Organization Science, 6 (2), 186–203.
57.
WarketinMerrillBeranekPeggy M. (1999), “Training to Improve Virtual Team Communication,” Information Systems Journal, 9 (4), 271–289.
58.
WongSze-SzeBurtonRichard M. (2000), “Virtual Teams: What are their Characteristics, and Impact on Team Performance?” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 6 (4), 339–360.
59.
WünderlichNancy V. (2009), Acceptance of Remote Services: Perception, Adoption, and Continued Usage in Organizational Settings. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
60.
XueMeiFieldJoy M. (2008), “Service Coproduction with Information Stickiness and Incomplete Contracts: Implications for Consulting Services Design,” Production and Operations Management, 17 (3), 357–372.
61.
YinRobert K. (2011), Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. London, UK: The Guilford Press.
62.
YinRobert K. (1984), Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
