Self-service technologies (SSTs) can help firms reduce labor costs while providing more channel options, but customers must be convinced of their value before foregoing a full service alternative. To understand how customers evaluate an SST, the authors conducted three studies to analyze the importance of convenience in the evaluation process along with exploring what constructs ultimately influence customers’ need for human interaction with an SST. Surveying both users’ experiences with an SST and also nonusers’ perceptions of an SST, a comprehensive analysis was undertaken to assess the perceived benefits of using an SST. In Study 1, the authors found that convenience had a strong positive effect on the perceived accuracy, speed, and exploration intentions of an SST. Building on these results, Studies 2 and 3 reveal that SST users have a lower need for interaction when they are satisfied with an SST, while nonusers’ trust perceptions had the greatest influence on the need for human interaction during an SST transaction. The authors discovered that user satisfaction can be enhanced by focusing on the speed and accuracy of an SST, whereas nonusers’ perceptions of accuracy and exploration increased the trust placed in an SST.
AhnTonyRyuSeewonHanIngoo (2007), “The Impact of Web Quality and Playfulness on User Acceptance of Online Retailing,”Information and Management, 44 (3), 263–275.
2.
AnandPunamSternthalBrian (1990), “Ease of Message Processing as a Moderator of Repetition Effects in Advertising,”Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (3), 345–353.
3.
BaSulinPavlouPaul A. (2002), “Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior,”MIS Quarterly, 26 (3), 243–268.
4.
BabinBarry J.DardenWilliam R.GriffinMitch (1994), “Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value,”Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (March), 644–656.
5.
BartYakovShankarVenkateshSultanFareenaUrbanGlen L. (2005), “Are the Drivers and Role of Online Trust the Same for All Web Sites and Consumers? A Large-Scale Exploratory Empirical Study,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (4), 133–152.
6.
BatesonJ. E. G. (1985), “Self-Service Consumer: An Exploratory Study,”Journal of Retailing, 61 (3), 49–76.
7.
BaumgartnerHansSteenkampJan-Benedic E. M. (1996), “Exploratory Consumer Buying Behavior: Conceptualization and Measurement,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (2), 121–137.
8.
BienstockCarol C.MentzerJohn T.BirdMonroe Murphy (1997), “Measuring Physical Distribution Service Quality,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (1), 31–44.
9.
CassabHaroldMacLachlanDouglas L. (2009), “A Consumer-based View of Multi-channel Service,”Journal of Service Management, 20 (1), 52–75.
10.
ChandonPierreWansinkBrianLaurentGilles (2000), “A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness,”Journal of Marketing, 64 (4), 65–81.
11.
CollierJoel E.SherrellDaniel L. (2010), “Examining the Influence of Control and Convenience in a Self-service Setting,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38 (4), 490–509.
12.
CollierJoel E.BienstockCarol C. (2006), “Measuring Service Quality in E-Retailing,”Journal of Service Research, 8 (3), 260–275.
13.
DabholkarPratibha A.Michelle BobbittL.LeeEun-Ju (2003), “Understanding Consumer Motivation and Behavior Related to Self-Scanning in Retailing,”International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14 (1), 59–95.
14.
DabholkarPratibha A.BagozziRichard P. (2002), “An Attitudinal Model of Technology-Based Self Service: Moderating Effects of Consumer Traits and Situational Factors,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (3), 184–201.
15.
DabholkarPratibha A. (1996), “Consumer Evaluations of New Technology-based Self-service Options: An Investigation of Alternative Models of Service Quality,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (1), 29–51.
16.
DavisFred D. (1989), “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology,”MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319–340.
17.
DemangeotCatherineBroderickAmanda J. (2010), “Exploration and its Manifestations in the Context of Online Shopping,”Journal of Marketing Management, 26 (13-14), 1256–1278.
18.
DingDavid XinHuPaul Jen-HwaShengOlivia R. Liu (2011), “e-SELFQUAL: A Scale for Measuring Online Self-service Quality,”Journal of Business Research, 64 (5), 508–515.
19.
DurkinMark (2004), “In Search of the Internet Banking Customer,”The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22(7), 484–503.
20.
EvansKennethBrownStephen W. (1988), “Strategic Options for Service Delivery Systems,” in Proceedings of the AMA Summer Educators' Conference, IngeneCharles A.FrazierGary L. (Eds.). Chicago: American Marketing Association. pp. 207–212.
FornellClaesLarckerDavid F (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models and Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 39–50.
23.
HaSejinStoelLeslie (2009), “Consumer E-shopping Acceptance: Antecendents in a Technology Acceptance Model,”Journal of Business Research, 62 (5), 565–571.
24.
HarrisLloyd C.GoodeMark M. H. (2010), “Online Servicescapes, Trust, and Purchase Intentions,”Journal of Services Marketing, 24 (3), 230–243.
25.
HessTraciFullerMarkCampbellDamon (2009), “Designing Interfaces with Social Presence: Using Vividness and Extraversion to Create Social Recommendation Agents,”Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 10 (12), 889–919.
26.
HoLi-anKuoTsung-HsienLinBinshan (2010), “The Mediate Effect of Trust on Organizational Online Knowledge Sharing: An Empirical Study,”International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 9 (4), 625–644.
27.
JohnsonDevon S.BardhiFleuraDunnDan T. (2008), “Understanding How Technology Paradoxes Affect Customer Satisfaction with Self-service Technology: The Role of Performance Ambiguity and Trust in Technology,”Psychology and Marketing, 25 (5), 416–443.
28.
LangeardEricBatesonJohnLovelockChristopher H.EiglierPierre (1981), “Service Marketing: New Insights from Consumers and Managers,”Marketing Science Institute's Report No. 81-104, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.
29.
LovelockChristopher H.YoungRobert F. (1979), “Look to Consumers to Increase Productivity,”Harvard Business Review, 57 (3), 168–178.
30.
MakaremSuzanne C.MudambiSusan M.PodoshenJeffrey S. (2009), “Satisfaction in Technology-enabled Service Encounters,”Journal of Services Marketing, 23 (3), 134–144.
31.
MentzerJohn T.FlintDaniel J.HultG. Tomas M. (2001), “Logistics Service Quality as a Segment-Customized Process,”Journal of Marketing, 65 (October), 82–104.
32.
MeuterMatthew L.BitnerMary JoOstromAmy L.BrownStephen W. (2005), “Choosing Among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (April), 61–83.
33.
MeuterMatthew L.OstromAmy L.BitnerMary JoRoundtreeRobert (2003), “The Influence of Technology Anxiety on Consumer Use and Experiences with Self-Service Technologies,”Journal of Business Research, 56 (11), 899–906.
34.
MeuterMatthew L.OstromAmy L.RoundtreeRobert I.BitnerMary Jo (2000), “Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters,”Journal of Marketing, 64 (July), 50–64.
35.
NunnallyJum C.BernsteinIra H. (1994), Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
OliverRichard L.SwanJohn E. (1989), “Consumer Perceptions of Interpersonal Equity And Satisfaction in Transactions: A Field Survey Approach,”Journal of Marketing, 53 (2), 21–35.
37.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlValarie A.BerryLeonard L. (1988), “SERVQUAL: A Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Customer Perceptions of Service Quality,”Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 12–40.
38.
PujariDevashish (2004), “Self-Service with a Smile? Self-service technology (SST) Encounters Among Canadian Business to Business,”International Journal in Service Industry Management, 15 (2), 200–219.
39.
RogersEverett M. (1983), Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd ed. New York: The Free Press.
40.
SeidersKathleenVossGlenn B.GodfreyAndrea L.GrewalDhruv (2007), “SERVCON: Development and Validation of a Mulitdimensional Service Convenience Scale,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35 (1), 144–156.
41.
SeidersKathleenVossGlenn B.GrewalDhruvGodfreyAndrea L. (2005), “Do Satisfied Customers Buy More? Examining Moderating Influences in a Retailing Context,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (4), 26–43.
42.
VanceAnthonyElie-Dit-CosaqueChristopheStraubDetmar W. (2008), “Examing Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture,”Journal of Management Information Systems, 24 (4), 73–100.
43.
WebsterJaneMartocchioJoseph J. (1992), “Microcomputer Playfulness: Development of a Measure with Workplace Implications,”MIS Quarterly, 16 (2), 201–226.
44.
WolfinbargerMaryGillyMary C. (2001), “Shopping Online for Freedom, Control, and Fun,”California Management Review, 43 (2), 34–55.
45.
ZhouTaoLuYaobinWangBin (2009), “The Relative Importance of Website Design Quality in Determining Consumers' Online Repurchase Behavior,”Information Systems Management, 26 (4), 327–337.
46.
ZhuZhenNakataCherylSivakumarK.GrewalDhurv (2007), “Self-service Technology Effectiveness: The Role of Design Features and Individual Traits,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35 (4), 492–506.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
