Extant literature is almost unanimous in suggesting that managers in goods-dominant firms should integrate services into their core market offers. Furthermore, in actual practice, numerous firms are striving with mixed results to become “solutions providers” by adding services to their portfolio of tangible goods. The literature does not, however, describe what factors to consider when adding services and how the factors should be designed to enhance organizational performance. The purpose of this study was to isolate and characterize factors that enable the formation of successful business-to-business (B2B) services in goods-dominant firms. Using a multicase research design, this study highlights four substantive cases of Fortune 500 firms in which B2B service development was a process of aligning strategy with a highly complex market. The study then illustrates how firms that demonstrate a record of successful B2B service development adapt several factors of organization to align with the newly formed strategy.
Andrews, Kenneth R. (1996), “The Concept of Corporate Strategy,” in The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases, Henry Mintzberg and James Brian Quinn, eds. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 47-55.
2.
Barney, Jay B. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,”Journal of Management, 17 (March), 99-120.
3.
Berlinger, Paul F. (1994), Thinking in Jazz: The Infinite Art of Improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Burns, Tom and G. M. Stalker (1961), The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.
5.
Collis, David J. and Cynthia A. Montgomery (1998), Corporate Strategy: A Resource-Based Approach. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
6.
Crossan, Mary and Marc Sorrenti (1997), “Making Sense of Improvisation,” in Advances in Strategic Management, James P. Walsh, Anne S. Huff, and Paul Shrivastava eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 155-180.
7.
Day, George S. (1997), “Aligning the Organization to the Market,” in Reflections on the Futures of Marketing: Practice and Education, Donald R. Lehmann and Katherine E. Jocz, eds. Cambridge, UK: Marketing Science Institute, 67-93.
8.
Day, George S. and Robin Wensley (1988), “Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Superiority,”Journal of Marketing, 52 (April), 1-20.
9.
Dess, Gregory D. and Donald W. Beard (1984), “Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (March), 52-73.
10.
Duncan, Robert (1972), “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (September), 313-327.
11.
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research,”Academy of Management Review, 14 (October), 532-550.
12.
Galbraith, Jay R. (1973), Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
13.
Galunic, Charles D. and Kathleen M. Eisenhardt (1996), “The Evolution of Intracorporate Domains: Divisional Charter Losses in High-Technology, Multidivisional Corporations,”Organization Science, 7 (May-June), 255-282.
14.
Gupta, Anil K. and Vijay Govindarajan (1986), “Resource Sharing among SBUs: Strategic Antecedents and Administrative Implications,”Academy of Management Journal, 29(December), 695-714.
15.
Hakansson, Hakan and Ivan Snehota, eds. (1995), Developing Relationships in Business Networks. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
16.
Hatch, Mary Jo (1997), “Jazzing Up the Theory of Organizational Improvisation,” in Advances in Strategic Management, James P. Walsh, Anne S. Huff, and Paul Shrivastava eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 181-191.
17.
Hill, Charles W. L., Michael A. Hitt, and Robert E. Hoskisson (1992), “Cooperative versus Competitive Structuresin Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms,”Organization Science, 3 (November), 501-521.
18.
Homburg, Christian, John P. Workman Jr., and Harley Krohmer (1999), “Marketing’s Influence within the Firm,”Journal of Marketing, 63 (April), 1-17.
19.
Hunt, Shelby D. and Robert M. Morgan (1995), “The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition,”Journal of Marketing, 59 (April), 1-15.
20.
Hunt, Shelby D. and Robert M. Morgan (1996), “The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions,”Journal of Marketing, 60 (October), 107-114.
21.
Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,”Journal of Marketing, 54 (April), 1-18.
22.
Kotler, Philip (2003), A Framework for Marketing Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
23.
Lawrence, Paul R. and Jay W. Lorsch (1967), Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston: Harvard University Press.
24.
Leonard-Barton, Dorothy (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development,”Strategic Management Journal, 13 (Summer), 111-125.
25.
Miles, Matthew B. and A. Michael Huberman (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Mintzberg, Henry (1979), The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.
Mintzberg, Henry (1996), “The Structuring of Organizations,” in The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases, Henry Mintzberg and James Brian Quinn, eds. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 331-349.
28.
Moorman, Christine (1995), “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (August), 318-335.
29.
Moorman, Christine and Anne S. Miner (1998), “The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Development,”Journal of Marketing, 62 (July), 1-20.
30.
Oliva, Rogelio and Robert Kallenberg (2003), “Managing the Transition from Products to Services,”International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14 (2), 160-172.
31.
Parkhe, Arvind (1993), “Messy Research, Methodological Predispositions, and Theory Development in Internal Joint Ventures,”Academy of Management Review, 18 (April), 227-268.
32.
Pennings, Johannes M. (1975), “The Relevance of the Structural Contingency Model for Organizational Effectiveness,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 20 (September), 393-410.
33.
Peplowski, Ken (1998), “The Process of Improvisation,”Organization Science, 9 (September-October), 560-561.
34.
Perry, Chad (1998), “Processes of a Case Study Methodology for Postgraduate Research in Marketing,”European Journal of Marketing, 32 (9/10), 785-802.
35.
Peteraf, Margaret A. (1993), “The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View,”Strategic Management Journal, 14 (March), 179-191.
36.
Pine, B. Joseph II, Don Peppers, and Martha Rogers (1995), “So You Want to Keep Your Customers Forever,”Harvard Business Review, 73 (March-April), 103-114.
37.
Prahalad, C. K. and Gary Hamel (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation,”Harvard Business Review, 68 (May-June), 79-91.
38.
Preston, Alistair (1987), “Improvising Order,” in Organization Analysis and Development: A Social Construction of Organizational Behaviour, Ian L. Mangham, ed. New York: John Wiley.
39.
Quinn, James Brian (1992), Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry. New York: Free Press.
40.
Ruekert, Robert W., Orville C. Walker Jr., and Kenneth J. Roering (1985), “The Organization of Marketing Activities: A Contingency Theory of Structure and Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 49 (Winter), 13-25.
41.
Sinkula, James M. (1994), “Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (January), 35-45.
42.
Slater, Stanley F. and John C. Narver (1995a), “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?”Journal of Marketing, 58 (January), 46-55.
43.
Slater, Stanley F. and John C. Narver (1995b), “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization,”Journal of Marketing, 59 (July), 63-74.
44.
Strauss, Anselm L. and Juliet M. Corbin (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Thompson, James D. (1967), Organizations in Action, New York: McGraw-Hill.
46.
Wilson, Elizabeth J. and Richard P. Vlosky (1997), “Partnering Relationship Activities: Building Theory from Case Study Research,”Journal of Business Research, 39 (May), 59-70.
47.
Yin, Robert K. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
