ORM-CARMA Virtual Feature Topics for Advanced Reviewer Development

Aguinis H. Ramani R. S. Alabduljader N . 2018. What you see is what you get? Enhancing methodological transparency in management research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 83-110.

Banks G. C. O’Boyle E. H. Pollack J. M. White C. D. Batchelor J. H. , et al. (2016). Questions about questionable research practices in the field of management: A guest commentary. Journal of Management, 42, 5-20.

Bedeian A. G . 2003. The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 331-338. doi:10.1177/1056492603258974

Bedeian A. G. Taylor S. G. Miller A. N . (2010). Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 715-725. doi:10.5465/amle.2010.56659889

Carpenter M. A. (2009). Editor’s comments: Mentoring colleagues in the craft and spirit of a peer review. Academy of Management Review, 34, 191-195.

Chambers C. D. Feredoes E. Muthukumaraswamy S. D. Etchells P . (2014). Instead of “playing the game” it is time to change the rules: Registered reports at AIMS neuroscience and beyond. AIMS Neuroscience, 1, 4-17. doi:10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.4

Emerson G. B. Warme W. J. Wolf F. M. Heckman J. D. Brand R. A. Leopold S. S . (2010). Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170, 1934-1939. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.406

Epstein S . (1995). What can be done to improve the journal review process. American Psychologist, 50(10), 883-885.

Feldman D. C . (2005). Writing and reviewing as sadomasochistic rituals. Journal of Management, 31(3), 325-329.

Grand J. A. Rogelberg S. G. Banks G. C. Landis R. S. Tonidandel S . (2018). From outcome to process focus: Fostering a more robust psychological science through registered reports and results-blind reviewing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 448-456. doi:10.1177/1745691618767883

Köhler T. Gonzàlez-Morales M. G. Banks G.C. O’Boyle E. Allen J. Sinha R. Woo S. E. Gulick L . (2020). Supporting robust, rigorous, and reliable reviewing as the cornerstone of our profession: Introducing a competency model for peer review. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13, 1-27.

Toth A. A. Banks G. C. Mellor D. O’Boyle E. H. Dickson A. Davis D. J. DeHaven A. Bochantin J. Borns J. (2021). Study preregistration: An evaluation of a method for transparent reporting. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36, 553-571.

Woznyj H. M. Grenier K. Ross R. Banks G. C. Rogelberg S. G . (2018). Results blind reviews: A masked crusader for science. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27, 561-576. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2018.1496081