Trends toward convergence on common methodologies and standardized templates restrict the diversity of qualitative methods in organizational research. Considering that graduate education is a critical process in the socialization of researchers into the norms and dominant practices of their discipline, graduate students’ socialization into research methodologies is vital for understanding methodological convergence. The purpose of our study was to understand how graduate students’ socialization shapes their methodological and paradigmatic preferences. Showcasing methodological bricolage as an alternative to qualitative templates, we constructed a research design that combined thematic, discourse, and narrative analyses to investigate graduate students’ reflections throughout a qualitative methods course introducing alternative research paradigms. Our findings highlight the role of institutional, disciplinary, and personal influences as well as identity work in researchers’ socialization and trace alternative trajectories by which socialization and methodological identity construction processes may unfold. We offer a sketch of methodological socialization and suggest that its understanding should be central to nurturing paradigmatic and methodological plurality in qualitative research. We conclude with implications for future research and for research methods training.
AdlerP.AdlerP. (2005). The identity career of the graduate student: Professional socialization to academic sociology. American Sociologist, 36(1), 11–37.
2.
AllportG. W. (1942). The use of personal documents in psychological science (Vol. 49). Social Science Research Council.
3.
AlvessonM.AshcraftK.ThomasR. (2008). Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization, 15(1), 5–28.
4.
AlvessonM.GabrielY. (2013). Beyond formulaic research: In praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 12(2), 245–263.
5.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. Sage.
6.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2014). Habitat and habitus: Boxed-in versus box-breaking research. Organization Studies, 35(7), 967–987.
7.
AlvessonM.WillmottH. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619–644.
8.
AshworthP. (1999). “Bracketing” in phenomenology: Renouncing assumptions in hearing about student cheating. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(6), 707–721.
9.
AustinA. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122.
10.
BakerT.NelsonR. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329–366.
11.
BakerV.LattucaL. (2010). Developmental networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 807–827.
12.
BansalP.CorleyK. (2011). From the editors: The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 233–237.
13.
BansalP.SmithW.VaaraE. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1189–1195.
14.
BartlettR.MilliganC. (2015). What is diary method. Bloomsbury.
15.
BeckerH.CarperJ. (1956). The development of identification with an occupation. American Journal of Sociology, 61(4), 289–298.
16.
BeechN. (2011). Liminality and the practices of identity reconstruction. Human Relations, 64, 285–302.
17.
BergerR. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(2), 219–234.
BevirM. (1999). Foucault, power, and institutions. Political Studies, 47, 345–359.
20.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
21.
BourdieuP. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford University Press.
22.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
23.
BreuerF.SchreierM. (2007). Issues in learning about and teaching qualitative research methods and methodology in the social sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(1), article 30.
24.
BrownA. (2015). Identities and identity work in organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17, 20–40.
25.
BrunerJ. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
26.
BuchananD.BrymanA. (2007). Contextualizing methods choice in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 10(3), 483–501.
27.
BurrellG.MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Heinemann.
28.
CampbellR. (2003). Preparing the next generation of scientists: The social process of managing students. Social Studies of Science, 33(6), 897–927.
29.
CassellC. (2016). European qualitative research: A celebration of diversity and a cautionary tale. European Management Journal, 34, 453–456.
30.
CassellC. (2018). “Pushed beyond my comfort zone”: MBA student experiences of conducting qualitative research. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 17(2), 119–136.
31.
CastillaE. (2008). Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. American Journal of Sociology, 113(6), 1479–1526.
32.
ClandininJ.ConnellyF. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
33.
ClemensE.CookJ. (1999). Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. American Sociological Review, 25, 441–446.
34.
CornelissenJ. (2017). Preserving theoretical divergence in management research: Why the explanatory potential of qualitative research should be harnessed rather than suppressed. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 368–383.
35.
CrottyM. (1998). The foundations of social research. Sage.
36.
CunliffeA. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28(4), 407–426.
37.
CunliffeA. (2010). Crafting qualitative research: Morgan and Smircich 30 years on. Organizational Research Methods, 14(4), 647–673.
38.
CunliffeA. (2018). Alterity: The passion, politics, and ethics of self and scholarship. Management Learning, 49(1), 8–22.
39.
DavisC.LesterJ. (2016). Graduate students’ construction of researcher identities explored through discourse analysis. Qualitative Research in Education, 5(1), 49–76.
40.
DeetzS. (1973). An understanding of science and a hermeneutic science of understanding. Journal of Communication, 23, 139–159.
41.
DeetzS. (1995). The micro-politics of identity formation in the workplace: The case of a knowledge intensive firm. Human Studies, 17, 23–44.
42.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1–28). Sage.
43.
DjelicM. (2008). PhD education—Challenges and opportunities of Europeanization. In MazzaC.QuattroneP.RiccaboniA. (Eds.), European universities in transition: Issues, models and cases (pp. 49–69). Edward Elgar.
44.
DowlingM. (2006). Approaches to reflexivity in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher, 13(3), 7–21.
45.
DuberleyJ.JohnsonP.CassellC. (2012). Philosophies underpinning qualitative research. In SymonG.CassellC. (Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges (pp. 15–34). Sage.
46.
DuymedjianR.RülingC.-C. (2010). Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organization Studies, 31(2), 133–151.
47.
DyA.MartinL.MarlowS. (2018). Emancipation through digital entrepreneurship? A critical realist analysis. Organization, 25(5), 585–608.
48.
Easterby-SmithM.Golden-BiddleK.LockeK. (2008). Working with pluralism: Determining quality in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 419–429.
49.
EganJ. (1989). Graduate school and the self: A theoretical view of some negative effects of professional socialization. Teaching Sociology, 17(2), 200–207.
50.
EisenhartM.JurowA. (2011). Teaching qualitative research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 699–714). Sage.
51.
ElviraM.GrahamM. (2002). Not just a formality: Pay system formalization and sex-related earning effects. Organization Science, 13(6), 601–617.
52.
FerralesG.FineG. (2005). Sociology as a vocation: Reputations and group cultures in graduate school. American Sociologist, 36(2), 57–75.
53.
FineG.WohlH. (2018). Reading and reputation: Sense, sensibility, and status in graduate education. Qualitative Research, 18(5), 554–564.
54.
GardnerS. (2007). “I heard it through the grapevine”: Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 54(5), 723–740.
55.
GardnerS. (2010). Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high- and low-completing departments: A qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution. Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 61–81.
56.
GeeJ. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge.
57.
GendronY. (2008). Constituting the academic performer: The spectre of superficiality and stagnation in academia. European Accounting Review, 17, 97–127.
58.
GergenK.GergenM. (1997). Narratives of the self. In HinchmanL.HinchmanS. (Eds.), Memory, identity, community: The idea of narrative in the human sciences (pp. 161–184). State University of New York Press.
59.
GioiaD.PitreE. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15, 584–602.
60.
GlesneC. (2015). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (5th ed.). Pearson.
61.
GlesneC.WebbR. (1993). Teaching qualitative research: Who does what?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 6(3), 253–266.
62.
GoldeC. (2015). The formation of scholars: Insights of the Carnegie initiative on the doctorate. GeoJournal, 80, 209–213.
63.
GopaulB. (2015). Inequality and doctoral education: Exploring the “rules” of doctoral study through Bourdieu’s notion of field. Higher Education, 70, 73–88.
64.
GreckhamerT.CilesizS. (2012). Critical and poststructural approaches to strategy research: Theoretical and methodological suggestions. In WangC.KetchenD.BerghD. (Eds.), West meets East: Building theoretical bridges (Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, Volume 8) (pp. 3–38). Emerald.
65.
GreckhamerT.CilesizS. (2014). Rigor, transparency, evidence, and representation in discourse analysis: Challenges and recommendations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 422–443.
66.
GreckhamerT.Koro-LjungbergM. (2005). The erosion of a method: Examples from grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(6), 729–750.
GreenB. (2005). Unfinished business: Subjectivity and supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(2), 151–163.
69.
GunzenhauserM.Gerstl-PepinC. (2006). Engaging graduate education: A pedagogy for epistemological and theoretical diversity. Review of Higher Education, 29(3), 319–346.
70.
HammersleyM. (2004). Teaching qualitative method: Craft, profession, or bricolage? In SealeC.GoboG.GubriumJ.SilvermanD. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 549–560). Sage.
71.
HardingS. (1987). The method question. Hypatia, 2(3), 19–35.
72.
HardingS. (Ed.). (2004). Feminist standpoint theory reader. Routledge.
73.
HarleyB. (2015). The one best way? “Scientific” research on HRM and the threat to critical scholarship. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(4), 399–407.
74.
HibbertP.CouplandC.MacIntoshR. (2010). Reflexivity: Recursion and relationality in organizational research processes. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 5(1), 47–62.
75.
IbarraH. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764–791.
76.
JoulliéJ.-E. (2016). The philosophical foundations of management thought. Academy of Learning & Education, 15(1), 157–179.
77.
KaomeaJ. (2016). Qualitative analysis as ho’oku’iku’i or bricolage: Teaching emancipatory indigenous research in postcolonial Hawai’i. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(2), 99–106.
78.
KeatR.UrryJ. (1975). Social theory as science. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
79.
KincheloeJ. (2001). Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 679–692.
80.
KincheloeJ. (2004). Introduction: The power of the bricolage: Expanding research methods. In BerryK.KincheloeJ. (Eds.), Rigour and complexity in educational research: Conceptualizing the bricolage (pp. 1–22). Open University Press.
81.
KincheloeJ. (2005). On the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 323–350.
82.
KnightsD.KerfootD. (2004). Between representations and subjectivity: Gender binaries and the politics of organizational transformation. Gender, Work & Organization, 11(4), 430–454.
83.
Knorr CetinaK. (1991). Epistemic cultures: Forms of reason in science. History of Political Economy, 23(1), 105–122.
84.
KöhlerT.SmithA.BhakooV. (2019). Feature topic for ORM: “Templates in qualitative research methods.”Organizational Research Methods, 22(1), 3–5.
85.
KubyC.ChristR. (2018). Productive aporias and inten(t/s)ionalities of paradigming: Spacematterings in an introductory qualitative research course. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(4), 293–304.
86.
KuhnT. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
87.
LangleyA.AbdallahC. (2011). Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 6, 201–235.
88.
LatherP. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. Routledge.
89.
LatherP. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35–57.
90.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
91.
Lévi-StraussC. (1966). The savage mind. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
92.
LincolnY. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275–289.
93.
LoweryD.EvansK. G. (2004). The iron cage of methodology: The vicious circle of means limiting ends limiting means. Administration & Society, 36(3), 306–327.
94.
MaddenT.MaddenL.RousseauM.WoehrD. (2016). Developing depth and breadth of research methods training for doctoral students with CARMA webcasts. International Journal of Management Education, 14, 368–378.
95.
MannheimK. (1936). Ideology and utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. Harcourt.
96.
MartinJ. (1990). Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organization Science, 1(4), 339–359.
97.
MartonF. (1981). Phenomenography—Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200.
98.
MartonF. (1986). Phenomenography—A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
99.
McAlpineL.AmundsenC.TurnerG. (2014). Identity-trajectory: Reframing early career academic experience. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 952–969.
100.
McKennaS.RichardsonJ.ManroopL. (2011). Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 148–157.
101.
MeisenbachR. (2010). The female breadwinner: Phenomenological experience and gendered identity in work/family spaces. Sex Roles, 62, 2–19.
102.
MichelA. (2011). Transcending socialization: A nine-year ethnography of the body’s role in organizational control and knowledge workers’ transformation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(3), 325–368.
103.
MillwardL. (2006). The transition to motherhood in an organizational context: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 315–333.
104.
MingersJ.WillmottH. (2013). Taylorizing business school research: On the “one best way” performative effects of journal ranking lists. Human Relations, 66(8), 1051–1073.
105.
MorganG.SmircichL. (1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 491–500.
106.
PelgerC.GrottkeM. (2015). What about the future of the academy? Some remarks on the looming colonization of doctoral education. Critical Perspectives in Accounting, 25, 117–129.
107.
PeshkinA. (1988). In search of subjectivity—One’s own. Educational Researcher, 17, 17–21.
108.
PiekkariR.WelchC.PaavilainenE. (2009). The case study as disciplinary convention: Evidence from international business journals. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), 567–589.
109.
PopperK. (1985 originally published in 1934). Scientific method. In MillerD. (Ed.), Popper selections (pp. 133–142). Princeton University Press.
110.
PrasadA. (2013). Playing the game and trying not to lose myself: A doctoral student’s perspective on the institutional pressures for research output. Organization, 20(6), 936–948.
111.
PrattM. (2008). Fitting oval pegs into round holes: Tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 481–509.
112.
PrattM.BonaccioS. (2016). Qualitative research in I-O psychology: Maps, myths, and moving forward. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(4), 693–715.
113.
PrattM.RockmannK.KaufmannJ. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 235–262.
114.
PrattM. G.SonensheinS.FeldmanM. S. (2022). Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120927466
115.
RaineriN. (2015). Business doctoral education as a liminal period of transition: Comparing theory and practice. Critical Perspectives in Accounting, 26, 99–107.
RitzerG. (1975). Sociology: A multiple paradigm science. American Sociologist, 10(3), 156–167.
118.
RogersM. (2012). Contextualizing theories and practices of bricolage research. Qualitative Report, 17(48), 1–17.
119.
RoksaJ.FeldonD. F.MaherM. (2018). First-generation students in pursuit of the PhD: Comparing socialization experiences and outcomes to continuing-generation peers. Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 728–752.
120.
RoulstonK.BhattacharyaK. (2018). Teaching qualitative inquiry in the era of the big tent. International Review of Qualitative Research, 11(3), 251–255.
121.
RyanG.BernardH. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15, 185–109.
122.
ScheurichJ. (1996). The masks of validity: A deconstructive investigation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(1), 49–60.
123.
ScheurichJ.YoungM. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our research epistemologies racially biased?Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4–16.
124.
SchnelkerD. (2006). The student-as-bricoleur: Making sense of research paradigms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 42–57.
SchwandtT. (2007). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Sage.
127.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
128.
SipeL.ConstableS. (1999). A chart of four contemporary research paradigms: Metaphors for the modes of inquiry. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 1, 153–163.
129.
SnowD.AndersonL. (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1336–1371.
130.
SonensheinS. (2010). We’re changing—or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 477–512.
131.
StanskeS.RauchM.CanatoA. (2020). Anti-identity strategizing: The dynamic interplay of “who we are” and “who we are not.”Strategic Organization, 18(1), 136–170.
132.
StoneL. (2006). From technologization to totalization in education research: US graduate training, methodology, and critique. Journal of Philosophy in Education, 40(4), 527–545.
133.
SuchmanM. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
134.
SvenningssonS.AlvessonM. (2003). Managing managerial identities: Organizational fragmentation, discourse and identity struggle. Human Relations, 56(10), 1163–1193.
135.
SymonG.CassellC.JohnsonP. (2018). Evaluative practices in qualitative management research: A critical review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20, 134–154.
Van MaanenJ. (1976). Breaking in: Socialization to work. In DubinR. (Ed.), Handbook of work, organization, and society (pp. 67–130). Rand McNally.
139.
Van MaanenJ.ScheinE. (1979). Toward a theory of socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 209–264.
140.
van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience. State University of New York Press.
141.
WacquantL. (1990). Sociology as socioanalysis: Tales of homo academicus. Sociological Forum, 5(4), 677–689.
142.
WaiteD. (2014). Teaching the unteachable: Some issues of qualitative research pedagogy. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(3), 267–281.
143.
WatsonT. (2008). Managing identity: Identity work, personal predicaments and structural circumstances. Organization, 15(1), 121–143.
144.
WeidmanJ.SteinE. (2003). Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 641–656.
145.
WeidmanJ.TwaleD.SteinE. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage?Jossey-Bass.
146.
WengerE. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.
147.
WolcottH. (2001). Writing up qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage.
148.
WolgemuthJ. (2016). Driving the paradigm: (Failing to teach) methodological ambiguity, fluidity, and resistance in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(6), 518–525.
149.
WoodL.KrogerR. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Sage.
150.
YancharS.WilliamsD. (2006). Reconsidering the compatibility thesis and eclecticism: Five proposed guidelines for method use. Educational Researcher, 35(9), 3–12.
151.
YbemaS.KeenoyT.OswickC.BeverungenA.EllisN.SabelisI. (2009). Articulating identities. Human Relations, 62(3), 299–322.
152.
ZimmermanD.WiederD. (1977). The diary: Diary-interview method. Urban Life, 5, 479–498.
153.
ZollerF.ZimmerlingE.BoutellierR. (2014). Assessing the impact of the funding environment on researchers’ risk aversion: The use of citation statistics. Higher Education, 68, 333–345.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
