It has been proposed that engagement with activism might make critical organizational scholarship more relevant to practitioners. However, there is a lack of systematic inquiry into how such engagement might be undertaken, which this article redresses. We propose activist ethnography as a suitable methodological framework for critical organizational scholarship, drawing on organizational ethnography, militant ethnography, and participatory action research, to construct a theoretical framework which we use to analyze four ethnographic vignettes of our own experiences of research with activists. Our contribution is to (a), assess the methodological challenges and opportunities of engagement with activism, (b) give an account of our own experiences as activist ethnographers for others to learn from, and (c) propose strategies whereby the challenges of academic activism might be negotiated and the opportunities maximized.
AdlerP. S. (2002). Critique in the name of whom and what?Organization, 9(3), 387–395.
2.
AdlerP. S.ForbesL. C.WillmottH. (2007). Critical management studies. In WalshJ. P.BriefA. (Eds.), Academy of management annals (Vol. 1, pp. 119–179). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
3.
AlvessonM. (2003). Methodology for close-up studies—Struggling with closeness and closure. Higher Education, 46, 167–193.
4.
AlvessonM.SpicerA. (2012). Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 65(3), 367–390.
5.
BarrosM. (2010). Emancipatory management: The contradiction between practice and discourse. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(2), 166–184.
6.
BarterC.RenoldE. (2003). Dilemmas of control: Methodological implications and reflections of foregrounding children’s perspectives on violence. In LeeR. M.StankoE. A. (Eds.), Researching violence: Essays on methodology and measurement (pp. 88–106). London, UK: Routledge.
7.
BeechN.HibbertP.MacIntoshR.McInnesP. (2009). But I thought we were friends: Life cycles and research relationships. In YbemaS.YanowD.WelsH.KamsteegF. (Eds.), Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life (pp. 196–214). London, UK: Sage.
8.
BellE.KingD. (2016, 4). Unmarking the unconference: Alternative methods of meeting organization as an organizational learning encounter. Paper presented at OLKC, St Andrews, UK.
9.
BisaillonL. (2012). An analytic glossary to social inquiry using institutional and political activist ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(5), 607–627.
10.
BojeD. (1998). Nike, Greek goddess of victory or cruelty? Women’s stories of Asian factory life. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(6), 461–480.
11.
BourdieuP. (1998). Acts of resistance. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
12.
BourgoisP. (2003). In search of respect: Selling crack in el barrio (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BrewisJ. (2014). The ethics of researching friends: On convenience sampling in qualitative management and organization studies. British Journal of Management, 25(4), 849–862.
14.
BrunwickT.CoghlanD. (2007). In defence of being “native”: The case for insider academic research. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 59–74.
15.
BurawoyM. (Ed.). (2000). Global ethnography: Forces, connections, and imaginations in a postmodern world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
BurkittI. (2012). Emotional reflexivity: Feeling, emotion and imagination in reflexive dialogues. Sociology, 46(3), 458–472.
ChattertonP.FullerD.RoutledgeP. (2007). Relating action to activism: Theoretical and methodological reflections. In KindonS.PainR.KesbyM. (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place (pp. 216–222). London, UK: Routledge.
19.
ChattertonP.HodkinsonS.PickerillJ. (2010). Beyond scholarly activism: Making strategic interventions inside and outside the neoliberal university. ACME, 10(2), 245–275.
20.
ChattertonP.PickerillJ. (2010). Everyday activism and transitions towards post-capitalist worlds. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(4), 475–490.
21.
CheckerM.DavisD.-A.SchullerM. (2014). The conflicts of crisis: Critical reflections on feminist ethnography and anthropological activism. American Anthropologist, 116(2), 408–420.
22.
ChellE. (1998). Critical incident technique. In SymonG.CassellC. (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide (pp. 51–72). London, UK: Sage.
23.
ChorashiH.WelsH. (2009). Beyond complicity: A plea for engaged ethnography. In SierkY.YanowD.WelsH.KamsteegF. (Eds.), Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life (pp. 231–252). London, UK: Sage.
24.
CliffordJ.MarcusG. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
ColemanL. M. (2015). Ethnography, commitment, and critique: Departing from activist scholarship. International Political Sociology, 9(3), 263–280.
26.
CollinsonD. L. (2003). Identities and insecurities: Selves at work. Organization, 10(3), 527–547.
27.
CookeB.KothariU. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny?London, UK: Zed Books.
28.
CooperC.CoulsonA. B. (2014). Accounting activism and Bourdieu’s “collective intellectual”—Reflections on the ICL case. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(3), 237–254.
29.
CotéM.DayR.de PeuterG. (2007). Utopian pedagogy: Creating radical alternatives in the neoliberal age. Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural Studies, 29(4), 317–336.
30.
CravenC.DavisD.-A. (Eds.). (2013). Feminist activist ethnography: Counterpoints to neoliberalism in North America. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
31.
CunliffeA. L. (2002). Social poetics as management inquiry: A dialogical approach. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11(2), 128–146.
32.
CunliffeA. L. (2010). Retelling tales of the field: In search of organizational ethnography 20 years on. Organizational Research Methods, 13(2), 224–239.
33.
CunliffeA. L.AlcadipaniR. (2016). The politics of access in fieldwork immersion, backstage dramas, and deception. Organizational Research Methods, 19(4), 535–561.
34.
DavisD.-A. (2003). What did you do today? Notes from a politically engaged anthropologist. Urban Anthropology, 32(2), 147–173.
35.
DehliK. (2003). “Making” the parent and the researcher: Genealogy meets ethnography in research on contemporary school reform. In TamboukouM.BallS. (Eds.), Dangerous encounters: Genealogy & ethnography (Vol. 17, pp. 133–152). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
36.
DenzinN. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. London, UK: Sage.
37.
DenzinN. K. (2006). Analytic autoethnography or déjà vu all over again. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 419–428.
38.
DonáG. (2007). The microphysics of participation in refugee research. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 210–229.
39.
ElbowP. (1981). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
EllisC. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29.
41.
EllisC.BochnerA. P. (1992). Telling and performing personal stories: The constraints of choice in abortion. In EllisC.FlahertyM. (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 79–101). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
EmihovichC. (2005). Fire and ice: Activist ethnography in the culture of power. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36(4), 305–314.
43.
EschleC.MaiguashcaB. (2006). Bridging the academic/activist divide: Feminist activism and the teaching of global politics. Millennium—Journal of International Studies, 35(1), 119–137.
44.
FenwickT. (2003). Emancipatory potential of action learning: A critical analysis. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(6), 619–632.
45.
FineG. A. (1993). Ten lies of ethnography moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(3), 267–294.
46.
FineM.WeisL. (1996). Writing the “wrongs” of fieldwork: Confronting our research/writing dilemmas in urban ethnographies. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(3), 251–274.
47.
FischerM. M. J. (1986). Ethnicity and the post-modern arts of memory. In MarcusG.CliffordE. & J. (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 194–232), London, UK: University of California Press.
48.
FlemingP.BanerjeeS. B. (2016). When performativity fails: Implications for critical management studies. Human Relations, 69(2), 257–276.
49.
FloodM.MartinB.DreherT. (2013). Combining academia and activism: Common obstacles and useful tools. Australian Universities’ Review, 55(1), 17–26.
50.
FoleyD. E. (2002). Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(5), 469–490.
51.
FortuneD.MairH. (2011). Notes from the sports club: Confessional tales of two researchers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 40(4), 457–484.
52.
FournierV.GreyC. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53(1), 7–32.
53.
FullerD. (1999). Part of the action, or “going native”? Learning to cope with “politics of integration.” Area, 31, 221–227.
54.
GergenK. J. (2003). Beyond knowing in organizational inquiry. Organization, 10(3), 453–455.
55.
GilmoreS.KennyK. (2015). Work-worlds colliding: Self-reflexivity, power and emotion in organizational ethnography. Human Relations, 68(1), 55–78.
56.
GondJ. P.CabantousL.HardingN.LearmonthM. (2016). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18, 440–463.
57.
GorliM.NicoliniD.ScarattiG. (2015). Reflexivity in practice: Tools and conditions for developing organizational authorship. Human Relations, 68(8), 1347–1375.
58.
GrayB. (2009). Putting emotion and reflexivity to work in researching migration. Sociology, 42(5), 935–952.
59.
GreyC. (2007). Possibilities for critical management education and studies. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23, 463–471.
60.
GrintK.JacksonB. (2010). Toward “socially constructive” social constructions of leadership. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 348–355.
61.
HansenH.TrankC. Q. (2016). This is going to hurt: Compassionate research methods. Organizational Research Methods, 19(3), 352–375.
62.
HartmannR. K. (2014). Subversive functionalism: For a less canonical critique in critical management studies. Human Relations, 67(5), 611–632.
63.
HassardJ.McCannL.MorrisJ. (2007). At the sharp end of new organizational ideologies: Ethnography and the study of multinationals. Ethnography, 8(3), 324–345.
64.
Hawthorne-SteeleI.MorelandR.RooneyE. (2015). Transforming communities through academic activism: An emancipatory, praxis-led approach. Studies in Social Justice, 9(2), 197–214.
65.
HayA. (2014). “I don’t know what I am doing!” Surfacing struggles of managerial identity work. Management Learning, 45(5), 509–524.
66.
HibbertP.SillinceJ.DiefenbachT.CunliffeA. L. (2014). Relationally reflexive practice: A generative approach to theory development in qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 17(3), 278–298.
67.
HodkinsonS.ChattertonP. (2006). Autonomy in the city? Reflections on the social centres movement in the UK. City, 10(3), 305–315.
68.
HuizerG. (1979). Research-through-action: Some practical experiences with peasant organisation. In HuizerG.MannheimB. (Eds.), The politics of anthropology (pp. 395–420). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
69.
HuizerG.MannheimB. (Eds.). (1979). The politics of anthropology. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
HumphreysM.BrownA. D.HatchM. J. (2003). Is ethnography jazz?Organization, 10(1), 5–31.
72.
HusseyI. (2012). “Political activist as ethnographer” revisited. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 37(1), 1–23.
73.
JohnsonW. B.MullenC. A. (2007). Write to the top! How to become a prolific academic. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
74.
JurisJ. S. (2007). Practicing militant ethnography with the movement for global resistance in Barcelona. In ShukaitisS.GraeberD.BiddleE. (Eds.), Constituent imagination: Militant investigations/collective theorization (pp. 164–176). Oakland, CA: AK Press.
75.
KarraN.PhillipsN. (2008). Researching “back home”: International management research as auto-ethnography. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 541–561.
76.
KhasnabishA.HaivenM. (2015). Outside but along-side: Stumbling with social movements as academic activists. Studies in Social Justice, 9(1), 18–33.
77.
KieserA.LeinerL. (2012). Collaborate with practitioners: But beware of collaborative research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(1), 14–28.
78.
KindonS.PainR.KesbyM. (Eds.). (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. London, UK: Routledge.
79.
KingD. (2015). The possibilities and perils of critical performativity: Learning from four case studies. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(2), 255–265.
80.
KingD.LearmonthM. (2015). Can critical management studies ever be “practical”? A case study in engaged scholarship. Human Relations, 68(3), 353–375.
81.
KondoD. K. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
82.
LandC.KingD. (2014). Organizing otherwise: Translating anarchism in a voluntary sector organization. Ephemera, 14(4), 923–950.
83.
Lyon-CalloV. (2004). Inequality, poverty, and neoliberal governance: Activist ethnography in the homeless sheltering industry. New York, NY: Broadview.
84.
Lyon-CalloV.HyattS. B. (2003). The neoliberal state and the depoliticization of poverty: Activist anthropology and “ethnography from below.”Urban Anthropology, 32(2), 175–204.
85.
MadisonD. S. (2012). Critical ethnography: Methods, ethics, and performance. London, UK: Sage.
86.
MalinowskiB. (1967). A diary in the strict sense of the term (GutermanN., Trans.). New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of action research. London, UK: Sage.
95.
Reed-DanahayD. (1997). Auto/ethnography. New York, NY: Berg.
96.
ReedyP. (2009). The manager’s tale: Stories of managerial identity. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
97.
ReedyP.KingD.CouplandC. (2016). Organizing for individuation: Alternative organizing, politics and new identities. Organization Studies, 37(11), 1553–1573.
98.
RipamontiS.GaluppoL.GorliM.GiuseppeS.CunliffeA. L. (2016). Pushing action research toward reflexive practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(1), 55–68.
99.
RodriguezC. (2003). Invoking Fannie Lou Hamer: Research, ethnography and activism in low-income communities. Urban Anthropology, 32(2), 231–251.
100.
RoseD. (1990). Living the ethnographic life. London, UK: Sage.
101.
Scheper-HughesN. (1995). The primacy of the ethical: Propositions for a militant anthropology. Current Anthropology, 36(3), 409–440.
102.
SpicerA.AlvessonM.KärremanD. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537–560.
103.
SpicerA.AlvessonM.KärremanD. (2016). Extending critical performativity. Human Relations, 69(2), 225–249.
104.
TerkelS. (1970). Working. New York, NY: New Press.
105.
Tillmann-HealyL. M. (2003). Friendship as method. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(5), 729–749.
106.
TylerS. (1986). Post-modern ethnography: From document of the occult to occult document. In CliffordJ.MarcusG. E. (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 122–140). Berkeley: University of California Press.
107.
Van MaanenJ. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
108.
Van MaanenJ. (2010). A song for my supper: More tales of the field. Organizational Research Methods, 13(2), 240–255.
109.
VarkarolisO.KingD. (2017). Voicing researched activists with responsive action research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 12(4), 315–334.
110.
WacquantL. (2011). Habitus as topic and tool: Reflections on becoming a prizefighter. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8(1), 81–92.
111.
WhyteW. F. (1993). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
112.
WickertC.SchaeferS. M. (2015). Towards a progressive understanding of performativity in critical management studies. Human Relations, 68(1), 107–130.
113.
WillmottH. (2008). Critical management and global justice. Organization, 15(6), 927–931.
114.
Wray-BlissE. (2002). Abstract ethics, embodied ethics: The strange marriage of Foucault and positivism in labour process theory. Organization, 9(1), 5–39.
115.
Wray-BlissE. (2003). Research subjects/research subjections: Exploring the ethics and politics of critical research. Organization, 10(2), 307–325.
116.
Wray-BlissE. (2004). A right to respond? Monopolisation of “voice” in CMS. Ephemera, 4(2), 101–120.
117.
YbemaS.YanowD.VelsH.KamsteegF. H. (Eds.). (2009). Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
