This article provides guidelines and illustrates practical steps necessary for an analysis of results from the multinomial logit model (MLM). The MLM is a popular model in the strategy literature because it allows researchers to examine strategic choices with multiple outcomes. However, there seem to be systematic issues with regard to how researchers interpret their results when using the MLM. In this study, I present a set of guidelines critical to analyzing and interpreting results from the MLM. The procedure involves intuitive graphical representations of predicted probabilities and marginal effects suitable for both interpretation and communication of results. The practical steps are illustrated through an application of the MLM to the choice of foreign market entry mode.
AgarwalS.RamaswamiS. N. (1992). Choice of foreign-market entry mode—impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 1–27.
2.
AnandJ.DeliosA. (1997). Location specificity and the transferability of downstream assets to foreign subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(3), 579–603.
3.
BartusT. (2005). Estimation of marginal effects using margeff. Stata Journal, 5(3), 309–329.
4.
BowenH. P.WiersemaM. F. (2004). Modeling limited dependent variables: Guidelines for researchers of strategic management. In KetchenD. J.BerghD. (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (Vol. 1, pp. 87–134). Oxford, UK: JAI/Elsevier Press.
5.
BrouthersK. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203–221.
6.
BrouthersK. D.BrouthersL. E. (2000). Acquisition or greenfield start-up? Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 89–97.
7.
BrouthersK. D.BrouthersL. E. (2003). Why service and manufacturing entry mode choices differ: The influence of transaction cost factors, risk and trust. Journal of Management Studies, 40(5), 1179–1204.
BrouthersK. D.BrouthersL. E.WernerS. (2008a). Real options, international entry mode choice and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 936–960.
10.
BrouthersK. D.BrouthersL. E.WernerS. (2008b). Resource-based advantages in an international context. Journal of Management, 34(2), 189–217.
11.
BrouthersK. D.DikovaD. (2010). Acquisitions and real options: The greenfield alternative. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1048–1071.
12.
BrouthersK. D.HennartJ. (2007). Boundaries of the firm: Insights from international entry mode research. Journal of Management, 33(3), 395–425.
13.
BrouthersK. D.NakosG. (2004). SME entry mode choice and performance: A transaction cost perspective. Entrepreneurship-Theory and Practice, 28(3), 229–247.
14.
BuckleyP. J.CassonM. C. (1998). Models of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 21–44.
15.
CameronA. C.TrivediK. P. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CanabalA.WhiteG. O. (2008). Entry mode research: Past and future. International Business Review, 17(3), 267–284.
17.
ChangS.ChungJ.MoonJ. J. (2013). When do wholly owned subsidiaries perform better than joint ventures?Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 317–337.
18.
ChenJ. J.DimouI. (2005). Expansion strategy of international hotel firms. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1730–1740.
19.
ChengS.LongJ. S. (2007). Testing for IIA in the multinomial logit model. Sociological Methods & Research, 35(4), 583–600.
20.
CombsJ. G.KetchenJ.DavidJ. (1999). Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: Toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics. Strategic Management Journal, 20(9), 867–888.
21.
DikovaD.van WitteloostuijnA. (2007). Foreign direct investment mode choice: Entry and establishment modes in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 1013–1033.
22.
ErramilliM. K.RaoC. P. (1990). Choice of foreign market entry modes by service firms: Role of market knowledge. Management International Review, 30(2), 135–150.
23.
GatignonH.AndersonE. (1988). The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4(2), 305–336.
24.
GauvinJ. (2012). A quick look at the margins command. Unpublished manuscript.
25.
GreeneW. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
HausmanJ.McFaddenD. (1984). Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica, 52(5), 1219–1240.
27.
HoetkerG. (2007). The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 331–343.
28.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
KimW. C.HwangP. (1992). Global strategy and multinationals’ entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 29–53.
31.
KleinS.FrazierG. L.RothV. J. (1990). A transaction cost analysis model of channel integration in international markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(2), 196–208.
32.
KogutB.SinghH. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3),
33.
LiJ.LiY. (2010). Flexibility versus commitment: MNEs’ ownership strategy in china. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1550–1571.
34.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables (advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
36.
MartinX. (2013). Solving theoretical and empirical conundrums in international strategy research: Linking foreign entry mode choices and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1), 28–41.
37.
MartinX.SalomonR. (2003). Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(4), 356–373.
38.
MeyerK. E. (2001). Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 357–367.
39.
MeyerK. E.EstrinS.BhaumikS. K.PengM. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61–80.
40.
NakosG.BrouthersK. D. (2002). Entry mode choice of SMEs in central and Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(1), 47–63.
41.
RafteryA. E. (1996). Baysian model selection in social research. In MarsdenP. V. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 111–163). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
42.
SampsonR. C. (2004). The cost of misaligned governance in R&D alliances. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 20(2), 484–526.
43.
SchwensC.EicheJ.KabstR. (2011). The moderating impact of informal institutional distance and formal institutional risk on SME entry mode choice. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 330–351.
44.
ShraderR. (2001). Collaboration and performance in foreign markets: The case of young high-technology manufacturing firms. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 45–60.
UhlenbruckK. (2004). Developing acquired foreign subsidiaries: The experience of MNEs in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 109–123.
47.
WeiY.LiuB.LiuX. (2005). Entry modes of foreign direct investment in china: A multinomial logit approach. Journal of Business Research, 58(11), 1495–1505.
48.
WiersemaM. F.BowenH. P. (2009). The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods. Strategic Management Journal, 30(6), 679–692.
49.
WilliamsR. (2012). Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. The Stata Journal, 12(2), 308–331.
50.
WilliamsonO. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.
51.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
52.
ZelnerB. A. (2009). Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1335–1348.
