The grounded theory method (GT) remains elusive and misunderstood by many—even those who advocate its use. In practice, many research studies cite the use of GT but merely apply certain a la carte aspects or jargon of the method while not actually incorporating the fundamental principles of the methodology. Consequently, the purpose of this article is fourfold: (a) to demystify the key tenets of GT, (b) to discuss the problematic impacts of adopting an a la carte approach to GT, (c) to draw attention to GT as a rigorous method for business research, and (d) to advocate for the increased use of GT by more researchers where appropriate. Throughout the article, the authors use the example of a recently completed GT study by the lead author to highlight the multiple dimensions of GT and how they all work together.
CharmazK. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century. Applications for advancing social justice studies. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 507–535). 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
FendtJ.SachsW. (2008). Grounded theory method in management research: Users' perspectives. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3):430–455.
6.
FournierS. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 343–373.
7.
GephartR. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 454–462.
8.
GlaserB. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
9.
GlaserB. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory. Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
10.
GlaserB. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective. Conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
11.
GlaserB. G. (2009). The novice GT researcher. The Grounded Theory Review, 8(2):1–21.
12.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
13.
GoffB. G.BolesJ. S.BellengerD. N.StojackC. (1997). The influence of salesperson selling behaviors on customer satisfaction with products. Journal of Retailing, 73(2):171–183.
14.
GouldingC. (2002). Grounded theory. A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
GremlerD. D.GwinnerK. P. (2008). Rapport-building behaviors used by retail employees. Journal of Retailing, 84(3):308–324.
16.
GummessonE. (2005). Qualitative research in marketing. Road-map for a wilderness of complexity and unpredictability. European Journal of Marketing, 39(3/4):309–327.
17.
IsabellaL. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1):7–41.
18.
JohnstonT. L. (2009). Marketing for acceptance. The Grounded Theory Review, 8(3):19–27.
19.
KleinH. Z.MyersM. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1):67–94.
20.
LagerM. (2005). Breaking down the silos. Customer Relationship Management, 11(July):48–52.
21.
LockeK. (1996). Rewriting the discovery of grounded theory after 25 years?. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 239–245.
22.
LockeK. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
LockeK. (2002). The grounded theory approach to qualitative research. In DrasgowF.SchmittN. (Eds)., Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations (pp. 17–43). 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
O’ReillyK. A. (2010). Service undone: A grounded theory of strategically constructed silos and their impact on customer-company interactions from the perspective of retail employees. (Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/669
25.
OrlikowskiW. J. (1993). CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 17, 309–340.
26.
OrlikowskiW. J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1):63–92.
27.
RingbergR.Odekerken-SchröderG.ChristensenG. L. (2007). A cultural models approach to service recovery. Journal of Marketing, 71, 194–214.
28.
SousaC. A. A.HendricsP. H. J. (2006). The diving bell and the butterfly. The need for grounded theory in developing a knowledge-based view of organizations. Organizational Research Methods, 9(3):315–338.
29.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
SuddabyR. (2006). What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4):633–642.
32.
UrquhartC.LehmannH.MyersM. D. (2010). Putting the “theory” back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20, 357–381.
