Abstract
This article presents statistical methods for identifying outcomes in a given sample that can be inferred as plausible extreme and whether the extremes on two variables are associated. Applications to CEO pay and performance of 50 top-paid CEOs illustrate these methodologies. Thresholds between extremes and nonextremes are found using high probability intervals under the probability distributions that govern sampling variations of the sample extremes. A Bayesian approach is used to compute odds on the association between the extremes of the two variables. The extreme pay—performance analysis of 50 top-paid CEOs reveals astonishing odds in favor of a company being extreme high only on one of the two versus on both variables. The result is considered decisive evidence for a negative association between extreme on CEO pay and extreme on performance among such top-paid CEOs. By contrast, analysis of the nonextreme CEOs yielded no evidence of any association between CEO pay and performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
