We review conjoint analysis (CA) usage in recent entrepreneurship research to assess how researchers have used the method to study entrepreneurial decision making. We first provide a brief overview of the method and present an exemplar study. We next examine how 16 studies published in leading entrepreneurship journals from 1999 to 2008 used CA, highlight topics these studies have investigated most frequently, and suggest reasons why studies, in general, have not used the method with greater frequency, despite its many advantages in studying decision making. We conclude by suggesting potential future research applications in an attempt to encourage greater CA usage in entrepreneurship research.
Aiman-Smith, L., Scullen, S., & Barr, S. ( 2002). Conducting studies of decision making in organizational contexts: A tutorial for policy-capturing and other regression-based techniques . Organizational Research Methods, 5, 388-414.
2.
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. ( 2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification . Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 105-123.
3.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. ( 1974). Theory in practice. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
4.
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 1-22.
5.
Bandura, A. ( 1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of changes. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
6.
Baron, R. ( 1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275-294.
7.
Baron, R. ( 2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs ‘‘connect the dots’’ to identify new business opportunities . Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 104-119.
8.
Baron, R., & Ensley, M. ( 2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs . Management Science, 52, 1331-1344.
9.
Bloom, P.N., Hoeffler, S., Keller, K.L., & Meza, C. ( 2006). How social-cause marketing affects consumer perceptions . MIT Sloan Management Review, 47, 49-55.
10.
Brush, C., Duhaime, I., Gartner, W., Stewart, A., Katz, J., Hitt, M., et al. (2003). Doctoral education in the field of entrepreneurship . Journal of Management, 29, 309-331.
11.
Busenitz, L., & Barney, J. ( 1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9-30.
12.
Busenitz, L., West, G., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29, 285-308.
13.
Choi, Y., & Shepherd, D. ( 2004). Entrepreneurs’ decisions to exploit opportunities . Journal of Management, 30, 377-395.
14.
Dean, M., Shook, C., & Payne, G. ( 2007). The past, present, and future of entrepreneurship research: Data analytic trends and training. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 601-618.
15.
DeSarbo, W., MacMillan, I., & Day, D. ( 1987). Criteria for corporate venturing: Importance assigned by managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 329-350.
16.
DeTienne, D., Shepherd, D., & De Castro, J. ( 2008). The fallacy of ‘‘only the strong survive’’: The effects of extrinsic motivation on the persistence decisions of underperforming firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 528-546.
17.
Ding, M., Grewal, R., & Liechty, J. ( 2005). Incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 67-82.
18.
Eckhardt, J., & Shane, S. ( 2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29, 333-349.
19.
Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Henkel, J. ( 2008). Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams: Trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 459-483.
20.
Fried, V. ( 2003). Defining a forum for entrepreneurship scholars. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 1-11.
21.
Gaglio, C., & Katz, J. ( 2001). The psychological basis for opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16, 95-111.
22.
Gartner, W. ( 1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship ? Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 15-28.
23.
Golden, B. ( 1992). The past is the past - Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 848-860.
24.
Green, P., & Rao, B. ( 1971). Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data . Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 355-363.
25.
Green, P., & Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 54, 3-19.
26.
Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. ( 2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.
Hoeffler, S. ( 2003). Measuring preferences for really new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 406-420.
28.
Janney, J., & Dess, G. ( 2006). The risk concept for entrepreneurs reconsidered: New challenges to the conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 385-400.
29.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. ( 1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
30.
Karren, R., & Barringer, M. ( 2002). A review and analysis of the policy-capturing methodology in organizational research: Guidelines for research and practice. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 337-387.
31.
Keh, H., Foo, M., & Lim, B. ( 2002). Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: The cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 27, 125-148.
32.
Ketchen, D., & Shook, C. ( 1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal , 17, 441-458.
33.
Kirzner, I. ( 1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature , 35, 60-85.
34.
Luce, R., & Tukey, J. ( 1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1-27.
35.
Markman, G., Balkin, D., & Baron, R. ( 2002). Investors and new venture formation: The effects of general self-efficacy and regretful thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 149-164.
36.
McMullen, J., & Shepherd, D. ( 2006). Encouraging consensus-challenging research in universities . Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1643-1669.
37.
Mitchell, J., Friga, P., & Mitchell, R. ( 2005). Untangling the intuition mess: Intuitions as a construct in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 653-679.
38.
Norton, W., & Moore, W. ( 2006). The influence of entrepreneurial risk assessment on venture launch or growth decisions. Small Business Economics, 26, 215-226.
39.
Oppewal, H., Louviere, J., & Timmermans, H. (2000). Modifying conjoint methods to model managers’ reactions to business environment trends. Journal of Business Research, 50, 245-257.
40.
Palich, L., & Bagby, D. ( 1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing , 10, 425-438.
41.
Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. ( 1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline review of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
42.
Shane, S. ( 2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
43.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, N. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-226.
44.
Shepherd, D. ( 1999). Venture capitalists’ assessment of new venture survival. Management Science, 45, 621-632.
45.
Shepherd, D., & Krueger, N. ( 2002). An intentions-based model of entrepreneurial teams’ social cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 167-187.
46.
Shepherd, D., & Zacharakis, A. (1997). Conjoint analysis: A window of opportunity for entrepreneurship research. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth ((Vol. 3, pp. 203-248). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
47.
Shepherd, D., & Zacharakis, A. (1999). Conjoint analysis: A new methodological approach for researching venture capitalists’ decisions . Venture Capital, 1, 197-217.
48.
Schoder, D., & Haenlein, M. ( 2004). The relative importance of different trust constructs for sellers in the online world. Electronic Markets, 14, 48-57.
49.
Shook, C., Priem, R., & McGee, J. ( 2003). Venture creation and the enterprising individual: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 29, 379-399.
50.
Simon, M., Houghton, S., & Aquino, K. ( 2000). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation . Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 113-134.
51.
Sitkin, S., & Weingart, L. ( 1995). Determinants of risky decision-making behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1573-1592.
52.
Smith, B., Matthews, C., & Schenkel, M. ( 2009). Differences in entrepreneurial opportunities: The role of tacit-ness and codification in opportunity identification. Journal of Small Business Management, 47, 38-57.
53.
Smith, V., & Walker, J. ( 1993). Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics . Economic-Inquiry, 31, 245-261.
54.
Stinchcombe, A. ( 1965). Social structures of organizations. In J. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 153-193). Chicago: Rand McNally.
55.
Tyebjee, T., & Bruno, A. ( 1984). A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science, 9, 1051-1066.
56.
Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. ( 2008). Opportunity identification and pursuit: Does an entrepreneur’s human capital matter? Small Business Economics, 30, 153-173.
57.
Venkataraman, S. ( 1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 119-138). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
