Idea sets—the complete stock of entrepreneurial ideas an individual has accessible within his or her memory at any given time—are proposed as a new unit of analysis through which the antecedents, processes, and outcomes of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition may be more fully understood. A number of dimensions are identified along which one person’s idea set may be compared with that of another person. These comprise the novelty, volume, content, stage of development, strategic value logic, and composite knowledge configuration of ideas within the idea set. The idea set construct and the methods advocated for its empirical operationalization provide a differentiated, comprehensive approach to investigating entrepreneurial opportunities. They also help to overcome sample selection and survival biases characterizing empirical research in this domain. A questionnaire-based idea set instrument, designed and tested in the corporate context, demonstrates good evidence of content, convergent and divergent validities.
Ansoff, I.H. ( 1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35, 113-124.
3.
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. ( 2003). A theory of opportunity identification and development . Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 105-123.
4.
Åstebro, T., & Gerchak, Y. ( 2001). Profitable advice: The value of information provided by Canada’s Inventor’s Assistance Program. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 10, 45-72.
5.
Baron, R.A., & Ensley, M.D. ( 2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs . Management Science, 52, 1331-1344.
6.
Best, J.B. ( 1995). Cognitive psychology (4th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company .
7.
Bhave, M.P. ( 1994). A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 223-242.
8.
Buchanan, J.M., & Vanberg, V.J. ( 1991). The market as a creative process. Economics and Philosophy, 7, 167-186.
9.
Burgelman, R.A. ( 1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223-244.
10.
Burgelman, R.A. ( 1991). Intra-organizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organization Science , 2, 239-262.
11.
Corbett, A.C. ( 2007). Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 97-118.
12.
Czernich, C. ( 2004). When ideas meet organizations. Stockholm : Stockholm School of Economics.
13.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. ( 2003). The role of social and human capital amongst nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 301-331.
14.
Demmert, H., & Klein, D.B. ( 2003). Experiment on entrepreneurial discovery: An attempt to demonstrate the conjecture of Hayek and Kirzner. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 50, 295-310.
15.
Dess, G.G., Lumpkin, G.T., & McGee, J.E. (1999). Linking corporate entrepreneurship to strategy, structure, and process: Suggested research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23, 85-102.
16.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H.M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 269-277.
17.
Dillman, D.A. ( 2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
18.
Dimov, D.P. ( 2004). The individuality of opportunity recognition: A critical review and extension. In J. Butler (Ed.), Opportunity identification and entrepreneurial behavior (pp. 135-161). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
19.
Dimov, D.P. ( 2007a). From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: The importance of person-situation learning match. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 31, 561-583.
20.
Dimov, D.P. ( 2007b). Beyond the single-person, single-insight attribution in understanding entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 31, 713-731.
21.
Dimov, D.P., & Shepherd, D.A. (2005). Human capital theory and venture capital firms: Exploring home runs and strike outs. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 1-21.
22.
Eckhardt, J.T., & Shane, S.A. ( 2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29, 333-349.
23.
Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. ( 1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., & Smith, S.M. ( 1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
25.
Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. ( 1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill Inc.
26.
Fiss, P.C. ( 2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations . Academy of Management Review, 32, 1180-1198.
27.
Gaglio, C.M. ( 2004). So what is an entrepreneurial opportunity? In J. Butler (Ed.), Opportunity Identification and Entrepreneurial Behavior (pp. 115-134). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
28.
Gartner, W.B., Carter, N.M., & Hills, G.E. ( 2003). The language of opportunity. In C. Steyaert & D. Hjorth (Eds.), New movements in entrepreneurship (pp. 103-124). London: Edward Elgar.
29.
Gatignon, H., Tushman, M.L., Smith, W., & Anderson, P. ( 2002). A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Management Science, 48, 1103-1122.
Goldenberg, J., Lehmann, D.R., & Mazursky, D. ( 2001). The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success. Management Science, 47, 69-84.
32.
Gregoire, D.A., Barr, P.S., & Shepherd, D.A. (2006). Opportunity acknowledgement as a cognitive process of alignment: Evidence from verbal protocols. Academy of Management Proceedings, B1-B6.
33.
Gruber, M., MacMillan, I.C., & Thompson, J.D. (2008). Look before you leap: Market opportunity identification in emerging technology firms. Management Science, 54, 1652-1665.
34.
Guilford, J.P. ( 1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
35.
Guilford, J.P. ( 1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill.
36.
Ireland, R.D., & Webb, J.W. ( 2007). A cross-disciplinary exploration of entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management, 33, 891-927.
37.
Kazanjian, R.K., Drazin, R., & Glynn, M.A. ( 2002). Implementing strategies for corporate entrepreneurship: A knowledge-based perspective. In Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset (pp. 129-151). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Limited.
38.
Kim, W.C., & Mauborgne, R. ( 2004). Value innovation. Harvard Business Review , 82, 172-180.
39.
Kirzner, I.M. ( 1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Kirzner, I.M. ( 1979). Perception, opportunity and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Knight, F.H. ( 1964). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
42.
Lieberman, M., & Montgomery, D. (1988). First-mover advantages . Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41-58.
43.
MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., & Jarvis, C.B. ( 2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioural and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 710-730.
44.
March, J.G., & Simon, H.A. ( 1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
45.
Markides, C.C. ( 2000). All the right moves. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
46.
McMullen, J.S., & Shepherd, D.A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31, 132-152.
47.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
48.
Moran, P., & Ghoshal, S. ( 1999). Markets, firms, and the process of economic development . Academy of Management Review, 24, 390-412.
Netemeyer, R.G., Bearden, W.O., & Sharma, S. ( 2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
51.
Podsakoff, P.M., & Organ, D.W. ( 1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
52.
Porter, M.E. ( 1980). Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competition. Free Press: New York.
53.
Porter, M.E. ( 1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.
54.
Sarasvathy, S.D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S.R., & Venkataraman, S. (2003). Three views of opportunity . In Z. Acs (Ed.), Handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 141-160). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.
55.
Schumpeter, J.A. ( 1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
Schumpeter, J.A. ( 1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Unwin University Books.
57.
Seifert, C.M., Meyer, D.E., Davidson, N., Patalano, A.L., & Yaniv, I. ( 1995). Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 65-124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58.
Shane, S. ( 2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 448-469.
59.
Shane, S. ( 2001). Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science, 47, 205-220.
60.
Shane, S. ( 2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual opportunity nexus. Cheltenham, Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
61.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 217-226.
62.
Shepherd, D.A., & DeTienne, D. ( 2005). Prior knowledge, potential financial reward, and the opportunity identification. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 18, 91-112.
63.
Styles, E.A. ( 2006). The psychology of attention. New York : Psychology Press.
64.
Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. ( 2009). The extent and nature of opportunity identification by experienced entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 99-115.
65.
Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Binks, M. ( 2003). Does entrepreneurial experience influence opportunity identification?Journal of Private Equity, Winter, 7-14.
