Giddings, L.S., & Grant, B.M. ( 2007). A Trojan Horse for positivism? Advances in Nursing Science, 30, 52-60.
2.
Kadushin, C., Hecht, S., Sasson, T., & Saxe, L. ( 2008). Triangulation and mixed methods designs. Field Methods, 20, 46-65.
3.
Kuhn, T. ( 1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Miller, S., & Fredericks, M. (2006). Mixed-methods and evaluation research: Trends and issues. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 567-579.
5.
Miller, S., & Gatta, J. ( 2006). The use of mixed methods models and designs in the human sciences: Problems and prospects. Quality & Quantity, 40, 595-610.
6.
O’Byrne, P. ( 2007). The advantages and disadvantages of mixing methods . Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1381-1391.
7.
Racher, F.E., & Robinson, S. ( 2003). Are phenomenology and postpositivism strange bedfellows ? Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25, 464-481.
8.
Sale, J., Lohfeld, L., Brazil, K. ( 2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality & Quantity , 36, 43-53.
9.
Williamson, G.R. ( 2005). Illustrating triangulation in mixed-methods nursing research . Nurse Researcher, 12, 7-18.
10.
Yu, C.H. ( 2006). Philosophical foundations of quantitative research methodology . Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
11.
Yu, C.H. ( 2007). Is automated data mining an emerging paradigm that can supersede hypothesis testing?Theory and Science , 9. Retrieved February 22, 2008 , from http://theoryandscience.icaap.org/content/vol9.2/Chong.html