Within organizational research, the subject of insider academic research has received relatively little consideration. By insider research, we mean research by complete members of organizational systems in and on their own organizations. Insider research can be undertaken within any of the three major research paradigms—positivism, hermeneutics, and action research—selected and presented in this article. First, we revisit some of the established research paradigms to see what position they might have on insider research. Second, we explore the dynamics of insider research under the headings of access, preunderstanding, role duality, and managing organizational politics. Our conclusion is that within each of the main streams of research, there is no inherent reason why being native is an issue and that the value of insider research is worth reaffirming.
Adler, P A., & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Adler, N., Shani, A. B. (Rami), & Styhre, A. (2004). Collaborative research in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
3.
Alvesson, M. (2003). Methodology for close up studies—Struggling with closeness and closure. Higher Education, 46, 167-193.
4.
Anderson, G. L., & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities?Educational Researcher, 28, 12-21, 40-40.
5.
Anderson, G. L., Herr, K., & Nihlen, A. (1994). Studying your own school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
6.
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. (1985). Action science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Bartunek, J. M., Crosta, T. E., Dame, R. F., & LeLachleur, D. F. (2000). Managers and project leaders conducting their own action research interventions. In Robert T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational consultation (2nd ed., pp. 59-69). New York: Marcel Dekker.
9.
Bartunek, J. M., & Louis, M. R. (1996). Insider/outsider team research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
11.
Buroway, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Coch, L., & French, J. R. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1, 512-532.
13.
Coghlan, D. (2001). Insider action research projects: Implications for practising managers. Management Learning, 32, 49-60.
14.
Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2005). Doing action research in your own organization (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
15.
Dalton, M. (1959). Men who manage. New York: Wiley.
16.
Deetz, S. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7, 191-207.
17.
Deshpande, R. (1983). “Paradigms lost”: On theory and method in research in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47, 101-110.
18.
Evered, R., & Louis, M. R. (1981). Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: “Inquiry from the inside” and “inquiry from the outside.” Academy of Management Review, 6, 385-395.
19.
Everett, J. (2002). Organizational research and the praxeology of Pierre Bourdieu. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 56-80.
20.
Gadiesh, O., & Gilbert, J. L. (1998). Profit pools: A fresh look at strategy. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 139-148.
21.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. New York: Doubleday.
22.
Greenwood, D. (1999) Action research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23.
Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Halle, D. (1984). America's working man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Heron, J., & Reason, P. (1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 33, 274-294.
28.
Hirchman, E. (1986). Humanistic inquiry in marketing research: Philosophy, method and criteria. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 237-249.
29.
Holian, R. (1999). Doing action research in my own organization: Ethical dilemmas, hopes and triumphs. Action Research International, Paper 3. http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/sawd/ari/ari/holian.html.
30.
Homa, P. (1998). Re-engineering the Leicester Royal Infirmary healthcare process. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Henley Management College/Brunel University, UK.
31.
Jacques, E. (1952). The changing culture of a factory. Dryden Press: New York.
32.
Jeffcut, P. (1996). Between management and the managed: The processes of organizational transition. In S. Linstead, R. Grafton-Small, & P. Jeffcut (Eds.), Understanding management (pp. 174-194). London: Sage.
Johnson, P., & Duberley, J. (2003). Reflexivity in management research. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1279-1303.
35.
Jones, M. O., Moore, M. D., & Snyder, R. C. (1988). Inside organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Kaplan, D. (2004). The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. London: Sage.
37.
Kraut, A. (1996). Organizational surveys: Tools for assessment and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
Krim, R. (1988). Managing to learn: Action inquiry in city hall. In P. Reason (Ed.), Human inquiry in action (pp. 144-162). London: Sage.
39.
Kunda, G. (1993). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
40.
Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Organization and environment. Glenview, IL: Irwin.
41.
McDonagh, J., & Coghlan, D. (2001). The art of clinical inquiry in information technology-related change. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 372-378). London: Sage.
42.
Merton, R. (1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 9-47.
43.
Miles, R., & Snow, C. (1986). Network organizations: New concepts for new forms. California Management Review, 26, 62-73.
44.
Morse, J. M. (1998). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 56-85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Nielsen, J. C. R., & Repstad, P. (1993). From nearness to distance—And back: On analysing your own organization. Copenhagen Business School, Institute of Organizational and Industrial Sociology, Papers in Organization, No. 14.
46.
Perry, C., Riege, A., & Brown, L. (1999). Realism's role among scientific paradigms in marketing research. Irish Marketing Review, 12, 16-23.
47.
Peter, J. P., & Olsen, J. C. (1983). Is marketing science?Journal of Marketing, 47, 111-125.
48.
Putnam, L. C., Bantz, S., Deetz, S., Mumby, D., & Van Maanen, J. (1993). Ethnography versus critical theory: Debating organizational research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2, 221-235.
49.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research. London: Sage.
50.
Reason, P., & Torbert, W. R. (2001). The action turn: Toward a transformational social science. Concepts and Transformation, 6, 1-37.
51.
Reed, M. (1996). Organizational theorizing: A historically contested terrain. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 31-57). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
Reichardt, C., & Cook, T. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In T. Cook & C. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research, (pp. 7-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Riemer, J. (1977). Varieties of opportunistic research. Urban Life, 5, 467-477.
54.
Roethlisberger, F., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
Roy, D. F. (1959). Banana time: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organization, 18, 158-168.
56.
Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 340-355.
57.
Schein, E. H. (1996). Strategic pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
59.
Seale, C., Gobo, G, Gubrium, J. F., & Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research practice. London: Sage.
60.
Shani, A. B., & Eberhardt, B. (1987). Parallel organization in a health care institution. Group and Organization Studies, 12, 147-173.
61.
Stablein, R. (1996). Data in organization studies. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 509-526). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
Stephenson, J. B., & Greer, L. S. (1981). Ethnographers in their own cultures: Two Appalachian cases. Human Organization, 40, 123-130.
63.
Susman, G., & Evered, R. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 582-603.
64.
Toulmin, S., & Gustavsen, B. (1996). Beyond theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
65.
Whyte, W. F. (1984). Learning from the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
Whyte, W. F. (1991). Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67.
Young, M. (1991). An inside job. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
68.
Zuber-Skerritt, O., & Perry, C. (2002). Action research within organizations and university thesis writing. The Learning Organization, 9, 171-179.
69.
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine. New York: Basic Books.
