Research examining relations between work group diversity and outcome measures often relies on diversity scores that are calculated on the basis of individual responses to organizational surveys. When employees fail to respond to a survey, however, the resultant diversity score representing their group will be somewhat distorted. The authors conducted a series of computer simulations to examine the extent to which correlations between group diversity scores (derived from continuous or categorical variables) and outcome variables were attenuated by various forms of random and systematic participant nonresponse. Results indicate that random nonresponse, and many forms of systematic nonresponse, substantially attenuate mean observed correlations.
Allen, N.J., Stanley, D.J., Williams, H.M., & Irwin, S.J. (2005, April). Assessing “dissimilarity from the group” effects: Evidence from computer simulations. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles.
2.
Ancona, D.G., & Caldwell, D.F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science , 3, 321-341.
3.
Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L., Neubert, M.J., & Mount, M.K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology , 83, 377-391.
4.
Barsade, S.G., Ward, A.J., Turner, J.D.F., & Sonnenfeld, J.A. (2000). To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly,45, 802-836.
5.
Blau, P.M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
6.
Broschak, J.P., & Davis-Blake, A. (2006). Mixing standard work and nonstandard deals: The consequences of heterogeneity in employment arrangements . Academy of Management Journal, 49, 371-393.
7.
Bunderson, J.S., & Sutcliffe, K.M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects . Academy of Management Journal, 45, 875-893.
8.
Chowdhury, S. (2005). Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: Is it important?Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 727-746.
9.
Cummings, J.N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50, 352-364.
10.
Cycyota, C.S., & Harrison, D.A. (2006). What (not) to expect when surveying executives: A meta-analysis of top manager response rates and techniques over time. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 133-160.
11.
de Jong, A., de Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of group potency: A study of self-managing service teams. Management Science , 51, 1610-1625.
12.
Dillman, D.A. (1991). The design and administration of mail surveys . Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 225-249.
13.
Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5, 111-123.
14.
Edwards, J.E., Thomas, M.D., Rosenfeld, P., & Booth-Kewley, S. (1997). How to conduct organizational surveys: A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Eigel, K.M., & Kuhnert, K.W. (1996). Personality diversity and its relationship to managerial team productivity. In M. N. Ruderman , M. W. Hughes-James, & S. E. Jackson (Eds.), Selected research on work team diversity (pp. 75-98). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
Elron, E. (1997). Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity. Leadership Quarterly, 8, 393-412.
17.
Gini, C. (1955). Variabilità e mutabilità (variability and mutability) . In E. Pizetti & T. Salvemini (Eds.), Memorie di metodologica statistica (memories of statistical methodology). Rome : Libreria Eredi Virgilio Veschi. (Original work published 1912).
18.
Halfhill, T., Nielsen, T.M., Sundstrom, E., & Weilbaecher, A. (2005). Group personality composition and performance in military service teams. MilitaryPsychology , 17, 41-54.
19.
Harrison, D.A., & Klein, K.J. (in press). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review.
20.
Harrison, D.A., Price, K.H., & Bell, M.P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
21.
Harrison, D.A., & Sin, H.P. (2005). What is diversity and how should it be measured ? In A. Konrad, P. Prasad, & J. Pringle (Eds.), Handbook of workplace diversity (pp. 191-216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Jackson, S.E., Brett, J.F., Sessa, V.I., Cooper, D.M., Julin, J.A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689.
23.
Jehn, K.A., & Bezrukova, K. (2004). A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 703-729.
24.
Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B., & Neale, M.A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly,44, 741-763.
25.
Keller, R.T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes . Academy of Management Journal, 44, 547-555.
26.
Kirkman, B.L., Tesluk, P.E., & Rosen, B. (2004). The impact of demographic heterogeneity and team leader-team member demographic fit on team empowerment and effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 29, 334-368.
27.
Klein, K.J., Conn, A.B., Smith, D.B., & Sorra, J.S. (2001). Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 3-16.
28.
Kurtzberg, T.R. (2005). Feeling creative, being creative: An empirical study of diversity and creativity in teams. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 51-65.
29.
Li, J., & Hambrick, D.C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams . Academy of Management Journal, 48, 794-813.
30.
Lichtenstein, R., Alexander, J.A., Jinnett, K., & Ullman, E. (1997). Embedded intergroup relations in interdisciplinary teams: Effects on perceptions of level of team integration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33, 413-434.
31.
Mayo, M., Pastor, J.C., & Meindl, J.R. (1996). The effects of group heterogeneity on the self-perceived efficacy of group leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 265-284.
32.
Mortensen, M., & Hinds, P.J. (2001). Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. International Journal of Conflict Management , 12, 212-238.
33.
Neuman, G.A., Wagner, S.H., & Christiansen, N.D. (1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group & Organization Management, 24, 28-45.
34.
Newman, D.A., & Sin, H.P. (2005, April). Indexing diversity under missing data conditions . Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles, CA.
35.
O'Reilly, C.A., Caldwell, D.F., & Barnett, W.P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly,34, 21-37.
36.
Pelled, L.H., Eisenhardt, K.M., & Xin, K.R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly,44, 1-28.
37.
Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1988). Wage inequality and the organization of work: The case of academic departments. Administrative Science Quarterly,33, 588-606.
38.
Randel, A.E. (2002). Identity salience: A moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work group conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 749-766.
39.
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E.W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12, 502-517.
40.
Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly,49, 101-133.
41.
Riordan, C.M. (2000). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 19, pp. 131-173). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
42.
Rogelberg, S.G., & Luong, A. (1998). Non-response to mailed surveys: A review and guide . Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 60-65.
43.
Rogelberg, S.G., Luong, A., Sederburg, M.E., & Cristol, D.S. (2000). Employee attitude surveys: Examining the attitudes of noncompliant employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 284-293.
44.
Rynes, S.L., & McNatt, D.B. (2001). Bringing the organization into organizational research: An examination of academic research inside organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 3-19.
45.
Schippers, M.C., den Hartog, D.N., Koopman, P.L., & Wienk, J.A. (2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 779-802.
46.
Simons, T., Pelled, L.H., & Smith, K.A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662-673.
47.
Smith, K.G., Collins, C.J., & Clark, K.D. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 346-357.
48.
Smith, K.G., Smith, K.A., Olian, J.D., Sims, H.P., O'Bannon, D.P., & Scully, J.A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly,39, 412-438.
49.
Sutcliffe, K.M. (1994). What executives notice: Accurate perceptions in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1360-1378.
50.
Teachman, J.D. (1980). Analysis of population diversity. Sociological Methods and Research, 8, 341-362.
51.
Timmerman, T.A. (2005). Missing persons in the study of groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 21-36.
52.
Van derVegt, G.S., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29, 729-751.
53.
Van Knippenberg, D., DeDreu, C.K.W., & Homan, A.C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022.
54.
Van Vianen, A.E.M., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2001). Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 97-120.
55.
Venkatesh, R., Challagalla, G., & Kohli, A.K. (2001). Heterogeneity in sales districts: Beyond individual-level predictors of satisfaction and performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29, 238-254.
56.
Webber, S.S., & Donahue, L.M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141-162.
57.
West, C.T., & Schwenk, C.R. (1996). Top management team strategic consensus, demographic heterogeneity and firm performance: A report of resounding nonfindings. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 571-576.
58.
Williams, K.Y., & O'Reilly, C.A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
