This study examines the construct validity of the Goldberg International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) measure by comparing it to a well-developed measure of the five-factor model, the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). A sample of 353 diverse students from a large U.S. university completed both measures. Structural equation modeling was used to conduct the multitrait-multimethod, multiple-group, and latent mean analyses. A model with five correlated trait factors and two method factors provided the best fit to the data. Support for convergent and discriminant validity was also found. Racial and gender differences were relatively small for both instruments. These results support the construct validity of the IPIP. However, neither the NEO-FFI nor the IPIP produced a very good fit when analyzing item-level data, suggesting considerable room for improvement.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1, Whole No. 211).
2.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
3.
Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
4.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
5.
Brost, L. G. (2001). Fathering appraisals as predictors of children’s stability and positive faith attitudes. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 62, 1139.
6.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
8.
Cattell, R. B. (1946). The description and measurement of personality. Yonkers, NY: World Book.
9.
Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Questionnaire. Campaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
10.
Conn, S. R., & Rieke, M. L. (1994). The 16PF fifth edition technical manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
11.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Still stable after all these years: Personality as a key to some issues in adulthood and old age. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim (Eds.), Life span development and behaviors (Vol. 3, pp. 65-102). New York: Academic Press.
12.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 343-359.
13.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). NEO-PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
15.
Dumenci, L. (1995). Construct validity of the self-directed search using hierarchically nested structural models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 21-34.
16.
Dumenci, L. (2000). Multitrait-multimethod analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 586-609). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
Eaker, D. G., & Walters, L. H. (2002). Adolescent satisfaction in family rituals and psychosocial development: A developmental systems theory perspective. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 406-414.
18.
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structure of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329-344.
19.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
20.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
21.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 1-28). Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
22.
Gough, H. G. (1987). California Psychological Inventory administrator’s guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
23.
Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B., Jr. (1980). The adjective checklist manual (Rev. ed). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
24.
Heaven, P. C. L., Mulligan, K., Merrilees, R., Woods, T., & Fairooz, Y. (2001). Neuroticism and conscientiousness as predictors of emotional, external, and restrained eating behaviors. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 30, 161-166.
25.
Heaven, P. C. L., & Newbury, K. (2004). Relationships between adolescent and parental characteristics and adolescents’ attitudes to school and self-rated academic performance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 56, 173-180.
26.
Hofstee, W. K. B., de Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146-163.
27.
Hogan, R. (1987). Personality psychology: Back to basics. In J. Aronoff, A. I. Rabin, & R. A. Zucker (Eds.), The emergence of personality (pp. 79-104). New York: Springer.
28.
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1992). Manual for the Hogan Personality Inventory. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
29.
Holden, R. R., & Fekken, G. C. (1994). The NEO five-factor inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women. Personality Individual Differences, 17, 441-444.
30.
Hough, L. M. (1992). The “Big Five” personality variables—construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
31.
Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ployhart, R. E. (2001). Determinants, detection, and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence, and lessons learned. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 152-194.
32.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
34.
Jackson, D. N. (1975). Multimethod factor analysis: A reformulation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 259-275.
35.
Jöreskog, K. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109-133.
36.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
37.
Leininger, A. (2002). Vietnamese-American personality and acculturation: An exploration of relations between personality traits and cultural goals. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures: International and cultural psychology series (pp. 197-225). New York: Kluwer Academic.
38.
Lim, B. C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2004). Transformational leadership: Relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 610-621.
39.
Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53-76.
40.
Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 177-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa P. T. (1985). Updating Norman’s “adequacy taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710-721.
42.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
43.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
44.
Mihura, J. L., Meyer, G. J., Bel-Bahar, T., & Gunderson, J. (2003). Correspondence among observer ratings of Rorschach, Big Five model, and DSM-IV personality disorder constructs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 20-39.
45.
Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Management, 13, 153-200.
46.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
47.
Ployhart, R. E., Lim, B. C., & Chan, K. Y. (2001). Exploring relations between typical and maximum performance ratings and the five factor model of personality. Personnel Psychology, 54, 809-843.
48.
Ployhart, R. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2004). Applications of mean and covariance structure analysis: Integrating correlational and experimental approaches. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 27-65.
49.
Rolland, J. P., Parker, W. D., & Stumpf, H. (1998). A psychometrics examination of the French translations of the NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI. Journal of Personality Assessment, 71, 269-291.
50.
Salgado, J. F. (1998). Sample size in validity studies of personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71, 161-164.
51.
Saucier, G. (1998). Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70263-276.
52.
Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1993). The Big Five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 966-974.
53.
Schmit, M. J., Ryan, A. M., Stierwalt, S. L., & Powell, A. B. (1995). Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 607-620.
54.
Schmitt, N., & Stults, D. M. (1986). Methodology review: Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10(1), 1-22.
55.
Somer, O., Korkmaz, M., & Tatar, A. (2002). Development of five factor personality inventory. Turk Psikoloji Degisi, 17, 21-36.
56.
Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structures between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229-239.
57.
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings (ASD-TR-61-97). San Antonio, TX: Lackland Air Force Base, Aeronautical Systems Division, Personnel Laboratory.
58.
Walker, D. F., & Gorsuch, R. L. (2002). Forgiveness within the Big Five personality model. Personality & Individual Differences, 32, 1127-1138.
59.
Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(1), 1-26.
