Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In organizational research, many multilevel structures are not fully nested but have a crossover structure. For example, in early recruitment study, the relationship between job applicants and recruiting companies has the crossover structure because each applicant is interested in applying multiple companies whereas each company is of interest to multiple applicants, and applicants and companies are not fully nested within each other. This article introduces the crossover linear modeling (CLM) method and argues that CLM is useful when dealing with multilevel crossover structures by combining the heterogeneities of all levels into one model. The article uses an example in early recruitment research to illustrate the use of CLM in modeling direct effects, cross-level effects, and interaction effects in a crossover data structure. The statistical analysis on an actual data set shows that CLM is able to identify both company-level and applicant-level heterogeneities. The article presents further examples to show that CLM can be applied to many organizational research settings when multilevel crossover structures are present.

Keywords

multilevel analysis crossover linear modeling random coefficient modeling hierarchical linear modeling early recruitment study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723.

Barber, A. E. (1998). Recruiting employees: Individual and organizational perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bliese, P. D. , & Ployhart, R. E. (2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing and illustrations. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 362-387.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

Bryk, A. S. , & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cohen, J. , Cohen, P. , West, S. G. , & Aiken L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cronbach, L. J. , Gleser, G. C. , Nanda, H. , & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: John Wiley.

Han, J. , & Collins C. (2002). Effect of company recruitment practice on job seeker’s perceived employment brand equity and intention to apply. Academy of Management Proceedings, A1-A7.

Hofmann, D. A. , Griffin, M. A. , & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 467-511). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

10.

Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analyses: Techniques and applications. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

11.

Kozlowski, W. J. , & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

12.

Kreft, I. , & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.

13.

Littell, R. C. , Milliken, G. A. , Stroup, W. W. , & Wlfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

14.

Ostroff, C. , & Bowen, D. E. (2000). Moving HR to a higher level: HR practices and organizational effectiveness. In K. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 211-266). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

15.

Raudenbush, S. W. , & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

16.

Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.

17.

Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 322-354.

Crossover Linear Modeling: Combining Multilevel Heterogeneities in Crossover Relationships

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References