Reviewing research on diversity and relational demography in teams and work groups, the authors compare different ways of measuring gender composition and demonstrate that existing practice can be theoretically biased. The authors conclude that within group-level analyses, the proportion of women should be used; whereas within individual-level analyses, the appropriate approach depends on whether a gender-by-gender composition interaction effect is found. The generalizability of this approach to other types of diversity is also discussed.
Alexander, J. A., Lichtenstein, R., & D’Aunno, T. A. (1996). The effects of treatment team diversity and size on assessments of team functioning. Hospital and Health Services Administration, 41(1), 37-53.
2.
Bedeian, A. G.,& Mossholder, K. W. (2000). The use of the coefficient of variation as a measure of diversity. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 285-297.
3.
Bird, S. R. (2003). Sex composition, masculinity stereotype dissimilarity and the quality of men’s workplace social relations. Gender, Work and Organization, 10, 579-604.
4.
Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
5.
Chattopadhyay, P. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273-287.
6.
Cordery, J. L. (1996). Autonomouswork groups and quality circles. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology(pp. 225-246). New York: John Wiley.
7.
DiTomaso, N., Cordero, R., & Farris, G. F. (1996). Effects of group diversity on perceptions of group and self among scientists and engineers. In M. N. Ruderman, M. W. Hughes-James, & S. E. Jackson (Eds.), Selected research on work team diversity(pp. 99-119). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8.
Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51-100.
9.
Edwards, J. R.,& Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577-1613.
10.
Fenwick, G. D., & Neale, D. J. (2001). Effect of gender composition on group performance. Gender, Work and Organization, 8, 205-225.
11.
Fields, D. L.,& Blum, T. C. (1997). Employee satisfaction inwork groups with different gender composition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 181-196.
12.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H.,& Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96-107.
13.
Iverson, R. D.,& Buttigeig, D. M. (1997). Antecedents of union commitment: The impact of union membership differences in vertical dyads and work group relationships. Human Relations, 50, 1485-1510.
14.
Jackson, S. E.,& Joshi, A.,& Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801-830.
15.
Jackson, S. E.,& Ruderman, M. N. (Eds.). (1995). Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Kirchmeyer, C. (1995). Demographic similarity to thework group: Alongitudinal study of managers at the early career stage. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 67-83.
18.
Knouse, S. B.,& Dansby, M. R. (1999). Percentage ofwork-group diversity andwork-group effectiveness. Journal of Psychology, 133, 486-494.
19.
Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Martins, L. L., Milliken, F. J., Wisenfeld, B. M.,& Salgado, S. R. (2003). Racioethnic diversity and group members’experiences: The role of the racioethnic diversity of the organizational context. Group and Organization Management, 28, 75-106.
21.
Mayo, M., Pastor, J. C., & Meindl, J. R. (1996). The effect of group heterogeneity on the selfperceived efficacy of group leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 265-284.
22.
Pelled, L. H. (1996). Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: A field investigation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 230-246.
23.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
24.
Pelled, L. H., Ledford, G. E., & Mohrman, S. A. (1999). Demographic dissimilarity and workplace inclusion. Journal of Management Studies, 36, 1013-1031.
25.
Ragins, B. R., Cornwell, J. M., & Miller, J. S. (2003). Heterosexism in the workplace: Do race and gender matter?Group and Organization Management, 28, 45-74.
26.
Randel, A. E. (2002). Identity salience: A moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 749-766.
27.
Rentsch, J. R.,& Klimoski, R. J. (2001). Why do “great minds” think alike? Antecedents of team member schema arrangement. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 22, 107-120.
28.
Riordan, C. M. (2000). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 19, 131-173.
29.
Riordan, C., & Shore, L. (1997). Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: Examination of relational demography withinwork units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 342-358.
30.
South, S. J., Bonjean, C. M., Markham, W. T., & Corder, J. (1982). Social structure and intergroup interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy. American Sociological Review, 47, 587-599.
31.
South, S. J., Bonjean, C. M., Markham, W. T.,& Corder, J. (1983). Female labor force participation and the organizational experiences of male workers. Sociological Quarterly, 24, 367-380.
32.
Teachman, J. D. (1980). Analysis of population diversity. Sociological Methods & Research, 8, 341-362.
33.
Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administratively Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
34.
Wheelan, S. A. (1996). Effects of gender composition and group status on member perceptions of group development patterns, effectiveness, and productivity. Sex Roles, 34(9/10), 665-686.
35.
Wheelan, S. A.,& Verdi, A. F. (1992). Difference in male and female patterns of communication in groups: A methodological artefact?Sex Roles, 27(1/2), 1-15.
36.
Williams, K. Y.,& O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). The complexity of diversity: A review of forty years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 77-140.
