Organizational change involves patterns of engagement across organizational lines and thus carries important cultural implications for participants and groups within communities of organizations. This article proposes using allegory as an interpretive device in the study of organizational change. Allegory allows organizational research to appreciate the way “characters” introduce distinct qualities into the change experience. Based on an action research program with public organizations in the state of Delaware, the article reveals the promise of allegory both for explicating theory and informing reflexive practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, G. B., & Ingersoll, V. H. (1990). Culture, technical rationality, and organizational culture. American Review of Public Administration, 20(4), 285-301.
2.
Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. M. (1998). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 283-312). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Alvesson, M. (1995). Cultural perspectives on organizations. London: Cambridge University.
5.
Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1985). Strategy, change and defensive routines. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
8.
Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together. Washington, DC: Brookings.
9.
Bell, C. (1997). Ritual. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Bluedorn, A. C., Johnson, R. A., Cartwright, D. K., & Barringer, B. R. (1994). The interface of convergence of the strategic management and organizational environment domains. Journal of Management, 20(2), 201-262.
11.
Bunyan, J. (1987). The pilgrim’s progress. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1678)
12.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. London: Heinemann.
13.
Carper, T. R. (1993). Executive order number six. Dover: State of Delaware.
14.
Chapple, E. D. (1941). Organization problems in industry. Applied Anthropology, 1, 2-9.
15.
Christians, C. G. (2000). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 133-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Clifford, J. (1986). On ethnographic allegory. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture (pp. 98-121). Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
Czarniawska, B. (1997a). A narrative approach to organization studies (Qualitative Methods Series 43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Czarniawska, B. (1997b). Narrating the organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B., & Jacobsson, B. (1995). Political organizations and commedia dell’-arte. Organization Studies, 16(3), 375-394.
21.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 1-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Eco, U. (1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
23.
Elg, U., & Johansson, U. (1997). Decision making in inter-firm networks as a political process. Organization Studies, 18(3), 361-384.
24.
Frost, P. J., Moore, L. F., Louis, M. R., Lundberg, C. C., & Martin, J. (1985). An allegorical view of organizational culture. In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds.), Organizational culture (pp. 13-26). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
26.
Grubbs, J. W., & Denhardt, R. B. (1999). Collaboration and allegory: Extending the metaphor of organizational culture in the context of interorganizational change. In Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 12, pp. 59-96). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
27.
Hawthorne, N. (1967). Young Goodman Brown. In F. C. Crews (Ed.), Great short works of Hawthorne (pp. 271-284). New York: Harper and Row. (Original work published 1835)
28.
Ingersoll, V. H., & Adams, G. B. (1992). The tacit organization. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
29.
Jones, M. O. (1996). Studying organizational symbolism (Qualitative Methods Series 39). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Kahn, W. A. (1993). Facilitating and undermining organizational change: A case study. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29(1), 32-55.
31.
Kim, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 37-50.
32.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
33.
Lawson, R. B., & Ventriss, C. L. (1992). Organizational change: The role of organizational culture and organizational learning. Psychological Record, 42(2), 205-219.
34.
Leeming, D. A., & Drowne, K. M. (1996). Encyclopedia of allegorical literature. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
35.
Madsen, D. L. (1996). Allegory in America: From Puritanism to postmodernism. New York: St. Martin’s.
36.
Marks, M. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (1998). Joining forces. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Nadler, D. A. (1998). Champions of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
Newman, K. L., & Nollen, S. D. (1998). Managing radical organizational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241-265.
40.
Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45-52.
42.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.
43.
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1-32.
44.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis (Qualitative Methods Series 30). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
Robins, J. A. (1987). Organizational economics: Notes on the use of transaction cost theory in the study of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(1), 68-86.
46.
Rosaldo, R. (1989). Culture and truth. Boston: Beacon.
47.
Roth, G. (1996). Learning histories: Using documentation to assess and facilitate organizational learning. Working paper, Center for Organizational Learning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
48.
Roth, G., & Kleiner, A. (1995). Learning about organizational learning: Creating a learning history. Working paper, Center for Organizational Learning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
49.
Sackmann, S. A. (1992). Culture and subcultures: An analysis of organizational knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 140-161.
50.
Sackmann, S. A. (Ed.). (1997). Cultural complexity in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
Schein, E. H. (1983). The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1), 13-28.
52.
Schein, E. H. (1997). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339-358.
54.
Smircich, L. (1985). Is the concept of culture a paradigm for understanding organizations and ourselves? In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds.), Organizational culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55.
Spekman, R. E., & Isabella, L. A. (2000). Alliance competence. New York: John Wiley.
56.
Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: Between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 37-51.
57.
Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1984). Studying organizational cultures through rites and ceremonials. Academy of Management Review, 9, 653-669.
58.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510-540.
59.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field. Chicago: University of Chicago.
60.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
Weick, K. E. (1996). Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 301-313.
62.
Whitman, J. (1987). Allegory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
Wilkof, M. V., Brown, D. W., & Selsky, J. W. (1995). When the stories are different: The influence of corporate culture mismatches on interorganizational relations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31(3), 373-388.
64.
Worren, N.A.M., Ruddle, K., & Moore, K. (1999). From organizational development to change management: The emergence of a new profession. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(3), 273-286.
