Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1994-03
Relative Energies and Structural Features of Small Amines and Their Ammonium Analogs: Results From 6-31G* Optimizations and an Mm2 Ammonium Force Field
An MM2 force field that reproduces the structural fea tures and relative energies of quaternary aliphatic amines as derived from ab initio calculations at the 6-31G* level has been completed. The purpose of the study is to provide Medicinal Chemists with a method of evaluating the structures and conformational ener gies of ammonium species typically found in pharma ceuticals. Full Cartesian coordinate geometry optimiza tions at the 6-31G* level are followed by single-point Møller-Plesset Perturbation calculations through the MP3 level, which were performed on CRAY X-MP/4, CRAY Y-MP/464, and VAX 8800 machines using Gaus sian 80(UCSF). Methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, and ethylmethyl- amines, N-Methylpiperidine, 2-Methylpiperidine, and corresponding ammonium systems are used to evalu ate changes in structure, barrier heights, and relative energies resulting from quaternization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, R.J., and Hudson, B.1985. Charge calculations in molecular mechanics. III. Amino acids and peptidesJ. Comp. Chem.6(3):173-181.
2.
Abraham, R.J., Medforth, C.J., and Smith, P.E.1991. Conformational analysis. Part 16. Conformational free energies in substituted piperidines and piperidinium saltsJ. Computer-Aided Molecular Design5(3):205-212.
3.
Allen, F.H., Brammer, L., Orpen, A.G., and Taylor, R.1987. Tables of bond lengths determined by X-ray and neutron dif fraction. Part 1. Bond lengths in organic compoundsJ. Chem. Soc. Per-kin Trans.II:S1-S19.
4.
Allinger, N.L., Burkert, U., and Profeta, S., Jr.1980. Ab Initio calculations of the rotational potential functions for propylamine and ethylmethylamineJ. Comp. Chem.1 (3):281-284.
5.
Allinger, N.L., and Profeta, S., Jr.1980. The torsional potential function for n-butaneJ. Comp. Chem.1(2):181-184.
6.
Allinger, N. L., and Yuh, Y. H. 1980. MM2(77) (IBM/MVS Version, QCPE Program # 395).
7.
Allinger, N.L., Yuh, Y.H., and Profeta, S. Jr.1981. MM2 Program (CDC/NOS Version, Program #407). QCPE Bulletin1:57.
8.
Allinger, N. L., and Yuh, Y. H. 1987. MM2(87) QCPE Program # 395.
9.
Allinger, N.L., Yuh, Y.H., and Lii, J-H.1989. Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. IJ. Amer. Chem. Soc.111(23):8551-8566.
10.
Bushweller, C.H.1992. Conformational preferences and the rotation-inversion dichotomy in aliphatic amines. Acyclic organonitrogen sterodyn. , 1-55. Edited by Lambert, J. B. and Takeuchi, Y. VCH: NY, NY. (Eng); this review covers exemplary systems, see cited papers by this author for additional details.
11.
Cho, S.G., Cartledge, F.K., Unwalla, R.J., and Profeta, S., Jr.1990. Rotational potential energy functions in ethylchlorosilane, (chloromethyl) methylsilane, and (chloromethyl) chlorosilane: MM2, MNDO, and Ab Initio calculations J. Molecular Structure ( Theochem) 204: 79-100.
12.
Chuang, H.C.1985. Molecular Mechanics Studies on Hydrazines and Ammonium SaltsUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA. Master's Thesis.
13.
Cremaschi, P., and Simonetta, M.1975. Barrier to internal rotation in the methylammonium ionJ. Molecular Structure29:39-45.
14.
Froimowitz, M.1986. Conformational properties of 3-phenylpiperidine and 3-phenylpyrrolidine opioid analgesicsJ. Comp. Chem.7(4):513-522. (cf. p. 515 and ref. 3,35-40.)
15.
Hagemann, H., Bill, H., and Mareda, J.1985. Raman study of conformational disorder in n-PrNH 3X (X = Cl, Br, I)J. Molecular Structure127:241-245.
JMP™ V1.0, 1989. SAS® Institute, Inc. Box 8000, SAS Circle, Cary NC 27512-8000.
18.
Lindgren, J., and Olovsson, I.1968. Hydrogen bond studies XVIII. The crystal structure of trimethylammonium chlorideActa Crystal. B24: 554-558.
19.
Profeta, S., Jr.1978. Conformational analysis of aliphatic amines by force faeld and quantum-mechanical methodsUniversity of Georgia , Athens, GA. Diss. Abstr. No. 79-14051.
20.
Profeta, S., Jr., and Allinger, N.L.1985. Molecular mechanics calculations on aliphatic aminesJ. Amer. Chem. Soc.107: 1907-1918.
21.
Profeta, S., Jr., Unwalla, R.J., and Cartledge, F.K.1989. Simple alkyldisilanes: MM2 and Ab Initio studies of their structures and barriers to rotationJ. Comp. Chem.10(1):99-103.
22.
Redfern, P. and Scheiner, S.1985. Effects of alkylation upon the proton affinities of nitrogen and oxygen basesJ. Comp. Chem.6(3):168-172.
23.
Schmitz, L.R. and Allinger, N.L.1990. Molecular mechanics calculations (MM3) on aliphatic aminesJ. Amer. Chem. Soc.112(23):8307-8315. (For full details of the MM3 program and how to obtain it, see Allinger, N. L., Yuh, Y. H., and Lii, J-H. 1989.)
24.
Schmitz, L.R., Allinger, N.L., and Profeta, S., Jr.1988. Rotation around the C1-C2 bond of propylamine, an Ab Initio studyJ. Comp. Chem.9(5): 460-464.
25.
Singh, U.C. and Kollman, P.A.1982. QCPE Bulletin2:121 (Program #446).
26.
Taylor, R. and Kennard, O.1983. Comparison of X-ray and neutron diffraction results for the N=H···O=C Hydrogen Bond. Acta Crystal. B39:133-138.
27.
Weiner, S.J., Kollman, P.A., Case, D.A., Singh, C., Ghio, C., Alagona, G., Profeta, S., Jr., and Weiner, P.1984. A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteinsJ. Amer. Chem. Soc.106(3): 765-784.
28.
Yadav, J.S., Hermsmeier, M., and Gund, T.1989. Comparison between Ab Initio and semiempirical net atomic charges of some nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonistsInter. J. Quantum Chemistry: Quantum Biology Symposium16. 101-117.
