Implementation of a Distributed Interactive Graphics System

Abstract

The design, implementation, and performance of a distributed interactive graphics software system are described. The software is distributed between two machines with very different ca pabilities, a supercomputer (CRAY-2) and a graphics workstation (Silicon Graphics Iris). Both machines run the same operating system (UNIX) and are programmed by the user. Three-dimen sional graphical transformations, display updates, the user interface, and related operations are handled by the graphics workstation, while computationally intensive operations and some graphics are performed by the supercomputer. Three versions of this distributed graphics system are described; one builds display lists on the supercomputer, one builds them on the workstation, and one does not build them at all. Communication between the two machines con sists of a remote graphics protocol built on TCP/ IP. The performance of two distributed graphics programs—a test case and an application from computational fluid dynamics—is reported, and the timing results are analyzed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailey, D.H. 1987. NAS kernel benchmark results. Moffett Field, Galif.: NASA Ames Research Center, in press.

Bailey, F.R. 1986. Status and projections of the NAS program. In: Computational mechanics—advances and trends, edited by A. K. Noor. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 7-21.

Buning, P.G. , and Steger, J.L. 1985. Graphics and flow visualization in computational flow dynamics. Presented at AIAA 7th computational fluid dynamics conf., Cincinnati, Ohio, July 15-17.

Cray Research. 1985. CRAY-2 engineering maintenance manual Mendota Heights, Minn.: Cray Research Inc.

Feinler, E. J. , Jacobsen, O. J. , Stahl, M. K. et al., eds. 1985. DDN protocol handbook. Vol. 1. Alexandria, Va.: Defense Technical Information Center.

Graham, S.L. , Kessler, P.B. , and McKusick, M.K. 1982. Gprof: a call graph execution profiler. In: Proc. ACM SIGPLAN '82 symp. on compiler construction. New York: Association for Computing Machinery , pp. 120-126.

Hamlin, G. 1975. Configurable applications for satellite graphics . Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, doctoral dissertation.

Hartzan, P.D. 1977. Configurable software for satellite graphics. Research and development report COO-3077-148. New York: Courant Mathematics and Computing Laboratory.

Jones, M.B. , Rashid, R. , and Thompson, M. 1984. Matchmaker: an interface specification language for distributed processing. GMU-CS-84-161. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University, Department of Computer Science.

10.

Kevorkian, D.E. 1985. System V interface definition. Indianapolis, Ind.: AT&T.

11.

Leffler, S.J. 1983. A 4.2BSD interprocess communication primer. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.

12.

Rao, J.R. , Winters, W.F. , and Schmidt, L.D. 1979. Performance evaluation of a test distributed graphics system. In: IEEE third international computer software and applications conference. Washington, D.C.: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 512-518.

13.

Rogers, S. , Merritt, F. , Choi, D. , and Buning, P. 1987. RIP (real-time interactive particle-tracer). Computer program and videotape . Moffett Field, Calif.: NASA Ames Research Center.

14.

Souza, R.J. , and Miller, S.P. 1986. UNIX and remote procedure calls: a peaceful coexistence? In: IEEE sixth international conference on distributed systems proceedings. Washington, D.C.: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 268-277.

15.

Sun Microsystems. 1985. Remote procedure call protocol specification. Mountain View, Calif. : Sun Microsystems.

16.

Thompson, J. , Warsi, Z. , and Mastin, C. 1985. Numerical grid generation, foundations and applications . New York: Elsevier.