The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the number of linear stapler firings used during rectal division influences the rate of anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients undergoing left hemicolectomy, sigmoidectomy, or anterior resection for cancer.
Methods:
This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. All consecutive patients with left or sigmoid colon or rectal cancer who underwent elective resection with primary anastomosis from 2013 to 2025 were included. Patients were categorized into three groups according to the number of linear stapler firings used to divide the rectum: rectal division with one stapler firing (group A), rectal division with two stapler firings (group B), and rectal division with three or more stapler firings (group C).
Results:
One hundred and sixty patients were included in group A, 68 patients in group B, and 17 patients in group C. The overall AL rate was 8.2% and rose significantly when multiple stapler firings were used (4.4% versus 13.2% versus 23.5% in groups A, B, and C, respectively; A versus B: P = .04; A versus C: P ≤ .01; B versus C: P = .55). Multivariate analysis confirmed multiple firings as an independent predictor of AL (two stapler firings: odds ratio [OR] = 3.06, P = .04; three or more stapler firings: OR = 5.04, P = .02).
Conclusions:
Multiple stapler firings during rectal transection are linked to increased rates of AL compared with the use of a single stapler firing. Prospective, multicenter trials are needed to validate these findings and to improve anastomotic safety in left colon, sigmoid, and rectal cancer surgery.
AngelucciGP, SinibaldiG, OrsariaP, et al.Morbidity and mortality after colorectal surgery for cancer. Surg Sci, 2013; 04(11):520–524.
2.
PaunBC, CassieS, MacLeanAR, et al.Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg, 2010; 251(5):807–818.
3.
ChiarelloMM, FransveaP, CariatiM, et al.Anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer surgery. Surg Oncol, 2022; 40:101708.
4.
McArdleCS, McMillanDC, HoleDJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2005; 92(9):1150–1154.
5.
NijssenDJ, WienholtsK, PostmaMJ, et al.The economic impact of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: A systematic review. Tech Coloproctol, 2024; 28(1):55.
6.
DochertyJG, McGregorJR, AkyolAM, et al.Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg, 1995; 221(2):176–184.
7.
AgnesiS, VirgilioF, FrontaliA, et al.Inferior mesenteric artery preservation techniques in the treatment of diverticular disease: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2024; 39(1):174.
8.
AlverdyJC. Biologically inspired gastrointestinal stapler design: “Getting to zero” complications. Am J Surg, 2023; 226(1):48–52.
9.
ScheidbachH, SchneiderC, KonradtJ, et al.Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection with curative intent for carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc, 2002; 16(1):7–13.
10.
CaulfieldH, HymanNH. Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: A spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surg, 2013; 148(2):177–182.
11.
YehCY, ChangchienCR, WangJ-Y, et al.Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: A prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg, 2005; 241(1):9–13.
12.
KimJS, ChoSY, MinBS, et al.Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg, 2009; 209(6):694–701.
13.
KnightCD, GriffenFD. An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Surgery, 1980; 88(5):710–714.
14.
GriffenFD, KnightCD, KnightCD. Results of the double stapling procedure in pelvic surgery. World J Surg, 1992; 16(5):866–871.
15.
RoumenRMH, RahusenF, WijnenMHWA, et al.“Dog ear” formation after double-stapled low anterior resection as a risk factor for anastomotic disruption. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000; 43(4):522–525.
16.
ItoM, SugitoM, KobayashiA, et al.Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2008; 23(7):703–707.
17.
KawadaK, HasegawaS, HidaK, et al.Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc, 2014; 28(10):2988–2995.
18.
BallaA, SaracenoF, RulloM, et al.Correction: Protective ileostomy creation after anterior resection of the rectum (PICARR): A decision-making exploring international survey. Updates Surg, 2025:10.1007/s13304. [cited 2025 Jul 20]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13304-025-02277-z
19.
RahbariNN, WeitzJ, HohenbergerW, et al.Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: A proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery, 2010; 147(3):339–351.
20.
ClavienPA, BarkunJ, de OliveiraML, et al.The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience. Ann Surg, 2009; 250(2):187–196.
21.
DomenghinoA, WalbertC, BirrerDL, et al.; The Outcome4Medicine consensus group. Consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions. Nat Med, 2023; 29(4):811–822.
22.
American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual [internet]. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al., editors. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2002 [cited 2025 Jun 23]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4757-3656-4
YamamotoS, FujitaS, AkasuT, et al.Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer using a stapling technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2012; 22(3):239–243.
26.
MatthiessenP, HallböökO, AnderssonM, et al.Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis, 2004; 6(6):462–469.
27.
KawasakiK, FujinoY, KanemitsuK, et al.Experimental evaluation of the mechanical strength of stapling techniques. Surg Endosc, 2007; 21(10):1796–1799.
28.
ParkJS, ChoiG-S, KimSH, et al.Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. Ann Surg, 2013; 257(4):665–671.
29.
PlatellC, BarwoodN, DorfmannG, et al.The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis, 2007; 9(1):71–79.
30.
LeeS, AhnB, LeeS. The relationship between the number of intersections of staple lines and anastomotic leakage after the use of a double stapling technique in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2017; 27(4):273–281.
31.
AkiyoshiT, UenoM, FukunagaY, et al.Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg, 2011; 202(3):259–264.
32.
TanakaK, OkudaJ, YamamotoS, et al.Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery with the double stapling technique for stage 0/I rectal carcinoma: A subgroup analysis of a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial. Surg Today, 2017; 47(10):1215–1222.
33.
Damgaard EriksenJ, EmmertsenKJ, MadsenAH, et al.The impact of multiple firings on the risk of anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive restorative rectal cancer resection and the impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival: A population-based study. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2022; 37(6):1335–1348.
34.
QuH, LiuY, BiD S. Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc, 2015; 29(12):3608–3617.
35.
BalciscuetaZ, UribeN, CaubetL, et al.Impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol, 2020; 24(9):919–925.
36.
KomenN, DijkJ-W, LalmahomedZ, et al.After-hours colorectal surgery: A risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2009; 24(7):789–795.
37.
Balciscueta ColtellZ, Balciscueta ColtellI, Uribe QuintanaN. Impact of indocyanine green angiography on anastomotic dehiscence rate in colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies. Cir Esp (Engl Ed), 2025; 103(5):268–278.
