Abstract
Leave No Trace’s efforts have historically focused on backcountry sites, but the (im)balance between visitation and conservation objectives is more prominent at frontcountry locations. Our research investigated the effectiveness of LNT signage at two frontcountry sites in western, North Carolina. Through 1,182 surveys and observations of visitor behavior, we evaluated users’ self-reported and assessed LNT knowledge, behaviors, and how they changed before and after an intervention (i.e., installation of LNT-focused signage at the treatment site). Survey results revealed that seeing any LNT-related signs influenced visitor’s perceived knowledge and behaviors on site. Behavior observations showed a significant decrease in social trail use at the treatment site. Treatment effects were small, though, and only 13.1% of visitors stopped to read the new signs. Future research could explore how different messaging approaches could improve the efficacy of signage, helping to target specific LNT behaviors that are most relevant in frontcountry settings.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
