Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examined the connection between guest engagement and interactions with provided interpretive elements within an interactive aviary at ZooTampa in Tampa, Florida. Survey data were collected at an interactive aviary where guests are provided the opportunity to feed the birds. Findings demonstrate that guests prefer to interact with a live interpreter versus posted exhibit signage, but interacting with the animals is the strongest indicator of desired outcomes. Furthermore, interactions with exhibit signage were not related to personal feelings of engagement, connection with animal, and enjoyment of watching the birds.

Keywords

zoo interpretation animal interaction exhibit signage guest engagement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Clayton

Fraser

Saunders

C. D.

(2009). Zoo experiences: Conversations, connections, and concern for animals. Zoo Biology, 28(5), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20186

Godinez

A. M.

Fernandez

E. J.

(2019). What is the zoo experience? How zoos impact a visitor’s behaviors, perceptions, and conservation efforts. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01746

Grajal

Luebke

J. F.

Kelly

L. A. D.

Matiasek

Clayton

Karazsia

B. T.

Saunders

C. D.

Goldman

S. R.

Mann

M. E.

Stanoss

(2017). The complex relationship between personal sense of connection to animals and self-reported proenvironmental behaviors by zoo visitors. Conservation Biology, 31(2), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12780

Hacker

C. E.

Miller

L. J.

(2016). Zoo visitor perceptions, attitudes, and conservation intent after viewing African elephants at the San Diego Zoo Safari Park. Zoo Biology, 35(4), 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21303

Howell

T. J.

McLeod

E. M.

Coleman

G. J.

(2019). When zoo visitors “connect” with a zoo animal, What does that mean? Zoo Biology, 38(6), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21509

Luebke

J. F.

Matiasek

(2013). An exploratory study of zoo visitors' exhibit experiences and reactions. Zoo Biology, 32(4), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21071

Luebke

J. F.

Watters

J. V.

Packer

Miller

L. J.

Powell

D. M.

(2016). Zoo visitors’ affective responses to observing animal behaviors. Visitor Studies, 19(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2016.1144028

Martin

(2012). A study of public education in zoos with emphasis on exhibit labels. International Zoo Educators Journal, 48.55–59.

Moss

A. G.

Pavitt

(2019). Assessing the effect of zoo exhibit design on visitor engagement and attitudes towards conservation. Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research, 7(4), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.19227/jzar.v7i4.422

10.

Ogle

(2016a). Can exhibits transform the adult visitor into the adult learner? International Zoo Educators Journal, 52, 36–38.

11.

Ogle

(2016b). Evaluation of new interpretive elements in an aquarium renovation. Journal of Interpretation Research, 21(1), 41–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258721602100105

12.

Pennisi

Lackey

N. Q.

Holland

S. M.

(2017). Can an immersion exhibit inspire connection to nature and environmentally responsible behavior? Journal of Interpretation Research, 22(2), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/109258721702200204

13.

Stern

M. J.

Powell

R. B.

(2020). Taking stock of interpretation research: Where have we been and where are we heading? Journal of Interpretation Research, 25(2), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211023205

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Do Zoo Visitors Attend to Interpretive Elements in Interactive Animal Exhibit Spaces? A Case Study From ZooTampa’s Lorikeet Landing Aviary

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material