Understanding best practices in various interpretive settings and contexts may help event planners to implement successful educational programs in which participants are satisfied with their experience and learning outcomes. With this in mind, we sought to examine participants’ perceptions and outcomes of a science education event in Oregon's HJ Andrews Experimental Forest, HJA Day. Data from 76 participants were quantitatively analyzed to understand how participants’ satisfaction with the field trip elements related to their perceived outcomes. Most participants were very satisfied with the field trip elements. Participants perceived overall satisfaction to be their greatest outcome, followed by overall appreciation, knowledge gain, and then change in thinking. All main outcomes positively and significantly correlated except for overall satisfaction and change in thinking. These findings may inform program planners of the experiences and outcomes that result from a field-based learning setting, thus allowing insight and preparation for similar programs in the future.
BellP., LewensteinB., ShouseA., & FedlerM. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
2.
ChesebroJ.L. (2003). Effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on student learning, receiver apprehension, and affect.Communication Education, 52 (2), 135–147.
3.
ChuanO.L., & BarnettT. (2012). Student, tutor and staff nurse perceptions of the clinical learning environment.Nurse Education in Practice, 12 (4), 192–197.
4.
ClarkeN. (2005). Workplace learning environment and its relationship with learning outcomes in healthcare organizations.Human Resource Development International, 8 (2), 185–205.
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
CollinsR., PaisleyK., SibthorpJ., & GookinJ. (2012). “Black and white thinkers” and “colorful problems”: Understanding student thinking in outdoor education.Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 4 (3), 185–198.
7.
EvansG.W., & SteckerR. (2004). Motivational consequences of environmental stress.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (2), 143–165.
8.
FalkJ.H., & HeimlichJ.E. (2009). Who is the free-choice environmental learner? In FalkJ., HeimlichJ., & FoutzS. (Eds.), Free-choice learning and the environment (pp. 23–38). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
9.
FalkJ.H., StorksdieckM., & DierkingL.D. (2007). Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning.Public Understanding of Science, 16, 455–469.
10.
FinnA.N., SchrodtP., WittP. L., ElledgeN., JernbergK.A., & LarsonL.M. (2009). A meta-analytical review of teacher credibility and its associations with teacher behaviors and student outcomes.Communication Education, 58 (4), 516–537.
11.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach.New York, NY: Psychology Press.
12.
HarrisD., & BellC. (2013). Evaluating and assessing for learning.New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
HirotoD.S. (1974). Locus of control and learned helplessness.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102 (2), 187–193.
KaiserF.G., BrüggerA., HartigT., BognerF.X., & GutscherH. (2014). Appreciation of nature and appreciation of environmental protection: How stable are these attitudes and which comes first?European Review of Applied Psychology, 64 (6), 269–277.
17.
KnowlesM. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy.Englewoods Cliff, NJ: Cambridge Adult Education.
18.
LinL., AtkinsonR.K., ChristophersonR.M., JosephS.S., & HarrisonC.J. (2013). Animated agents and learning: Does the type of verbal feedback they provide matter?Computers & Education, 67, 239–249.
19.
LizzioA., WilsonK., & SimonsR. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice.Studies in Higher Education, 27 (1), 27–52.
20.
LTER Network Office. (2015). 2014 Annual Report of the Long Term Ecological Research Network.Retrieved from The Long Term Ecological Research Network: lternet.edu
21.
MadinE.M., & FentonD.M. (2004). Environmental interpretation in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: An assessment of programme effectiveness.Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 12 (2), 121–137.
22.
McClainL.R., & ZimmermanH.T. (2014). Prior experiences shaping family science conversations at a nature center.Science Education, 98 (6), 1009–1032.
23.
McClainL.R., & ZimmermanH.T. (2017). Memories on the trail: Families connecting their prior informal learning experiences to the natural world during nature walks.Journal of Interpretation Research, 21 (2).
24.
NeedhamM. (2010). Public opinions of the Food for Thought lecture series.Survey, Oregon State University, College of Forestry.
25.
PettyR., & CacioppoJ. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change.New York, NY: Springer.
26.
PiantaR.C., HamreB.K., & AllenJ.P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In ChristensonS. L., ReschlyA.L., & WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). New York, NY: Springer.
27.
PowellR. B., & HamS. H. (2008). Can ecotourism interpretation really lead to pro-conservation knowledge, attitudes and behaviour? Evidence from the Galapagos Islands.Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16 (4), 467–489.
28.
RemenickL. (2015). HJA Day experiences: Understanding participant outcomes at a non-formal science education event. Master's Thesis. Retrieved from Oregon State University Scholars Archive.
29.
SkibinsJ.C., PowellR.B., & SternM.J. (2012). Exploring empirical support for interpretation's best practices.Journal of Interpretation Research, 17 (1), 25–44.
30.
SternM.J., & PowellR.B. (2013). What leads to better visitor outcomes in live interpretation?Journal of Interpretation Research, 18 (2), 9–44.
TowlerA.J., & DipboyeR.L. (2001). Effects of trainer expressiveness, organization, and trainee goal orientation on training outcomes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (4), 664.
33.
WangV.C. (2003). Principles of adult education.Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
