Historic sites can facilitate public interaction with controversial topics through “hot interpretation” that promotes affective responses. The goal of this article is to critically analyze the evolution of interpretive messaging of the armed resistance of 1885 at Batoche National Historic Site, Canada, through the lens of hot interpretation. Based on a literature review, interpretation evaluations, and site visits, the authors examine how collaborative management approaches have fostered an evolution in interpretation from the one-truth, to parallel narratives, and finally to the “many voices” approach within the hot interpretation framework. This overview suggest how collaborative management approaches and progressive interpretation strategies can heal the hurt of the past, validate various depictions of history, provide venues for democratic discourse about contested issues, generate new thinking, and support resilient communities.
AdenR. C. (2010). Redefining the “Cradle of Liberty”: The President's House controversy in Independence National Historical Park.Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 13 (2), 251–280.
3.
AshleyS. L. T. (2014). ‘Engage the world': Examining conflicts of engagement in public museums.International Journal of Cultural Policy, 20 (3), 261–280.
4.
BallantyneR. (2003). Interpreting apartheid: Visitors’ perceptions of the District Six Museum.Curator: The Museum Journal, 26 (4), 279–291.
5.
BallantyneR., & UzzellD. (1993). Environmental mediation and hot interpretation: A case study of District Six, Cape Town.Journal of Environmental Education, 24 (3), 4–7.
6.
BallantyneR., PackerJ., & BondN. (2012). Interpreting shared and contested histories: the Broken Links Exhibition.Curator: The Museum Journal, 55 (2), 153–166.
7.
BarkwellL. (2005). Batoche 1885: The militia of the Métis Liberation Movement.Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Métis Federation.
ButlerS. R. (2008). Contested representations: Revisiting into the heart of Africa.Peterborough, ON: Broadview.
11.
CameronF. (2011). From mitigation to creativity: The agency of museums and science centres and the means to govern climate change.Museum and Society, 9 (2): 90–106.
12.
CameronF., & KellyL. (2010). Hot topics, public culture, museums.Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
13.
CarlssonL., & BerkesF. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications.Journal of Environmental Management, 75, 65–76.
14.
ChlebnikA. J., & RedfieldT. (2014). Walking in their shoes: A naturalist's guide to interpretive controversy.Legacy, 25 (1), 6–8.
15.
CutlerW. W. (2000). Cultural literacy, historic preservation, and commemoration: Some thoughts for educational historians.History of Education Quarterly, 40 (4), 477–482.
FosterK. (2013). Thunder on the Prairie.Canada's History, 93 (1), 21–26.
18.
Government of Canada. (2000). National Parks Act. s.c. 2000, c. 32.Ottawa, ON: Minister of Justice.
19.
HannamK. (2006). Contested representations of war and heritage at the Residency, Lucknow, India.International Journal of Tourism Research, 8, 199–212.
20.
HayesB. (2012). Without controversy: The development of Fort Pillow State Historic Park.Proceedings of the 2011 George Wright Society Conference, 137–141.
21.
HeywardI. (2012). One object, many voices: From participation to interpretation.MFA thesis, Philadelphia, PA: The University of the Arts.
22.
HildebrandtW. (1994). View from Fort Battleford: Constructed visions of an Anglo-Canadian West.Regina, SK: Canadian Plains Research Center, University of Regina.
23.
HildebrandtW. (2012). Battle of Batoche: British small warfare and the entrenched Métis.2nd ed.Vancouver, BC: Talonbooks.
24.
HuttonD. A. (1996). Back to Batoche: A cultural centre for the Métis Nation of Saskatchewan.Master's Thesis, Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.
25.
HvenegaardG. T., ShultisJ. (2016). The role of interpretation. In: DeardenP., RollinsR., & NeedhamM. (Eds.), Parks and protected areas in Canada: Planning and management, 4th ed. (141–169). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
KutzlerK. (2013). Lessons in interpreting controversial history at a southern heritage site. Blog at www.publichistorycommons.org.
29.
LemelinR.H., Powys WhyteK., JohansenK., Higgins DesbiollesF., WilsonC., & HemmingS. (2013). Conflicts, battlefields, indigenous peoples and tourism: Addressing dissonant heritage in warfare tourism in Australia and North America in the 21st century.International Journal of Culture, Tourism, and Hospitality Research, 7 (3), 257–271.
30.
LemelinR.H., Thompson-CarrA., JohnstonM., StewartE., & DawsonJ. (2013). Indigenous people: Discussing the forgotten dimension of dark tourism and battlefield tourism. In MüllerD. M., LundmarkL., & LemelinR. H. (Eds.), Issues in polar tourism: Communities, environments, politics (pp. 205–216). New York, NY: Springer.
31.
LongL. M. (2014). The paradoxes of sustainability: Interpreting culinary history & industrial agriculture.Legacy, 25 (1), 14–16.
32.
LynchB. T., & AlbertiS. J. M. M. (2010). Legacies of prejudice: Racism, co-production and radical trust in the museum.Museum Management and Curatorship, 25 (1), 13–35.
33.
MartinC. (2003). Questions about controversial topics.Interpscan, (May/June), 3.
34.
McCulloughA. (2002). Parks Canada and the 1885 rebellion/uprising/resistance.Prairie Forum, 27 (2), 161–198.
35.
McEnteeM., & MortimerC. (2013). Challenging the one-way paradigm for more effective science communication: A critical review of two public campaigns addressing contentious environmental issues.Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 12, 68–76.
36.
MelenaS. (2014). What's preventing you from interpreting climate change?Legacy, 25 (1), 24–26.
OsborneB. S. (2001). Landscapes, memory, monuments, and commemoration: Putting identity in its place.Canadian Ethnic Studies, 33 (3), 39–77.
39.
OsborneB. S. (2002). Corporeal politics and the body politic: The re-presentation of Louis Riel in Canadian identity.International Journal of Heritage Studies, 8 (4), 303–322.
40.
PannekoekF. (2000). Who matters? Public history and the invention of the Canadian past.Acadiensis, 29 (2), 205–217.
41.
PannekoekF. (2009). Canada's historic sites: Reflections on a quarter century, 1980–2005.The Public Historian, 31 (1), 69–88.
42.
Parks Canada. (1997). Batoche National Historic Site: Commemorative integrity statement.Ottawa, ON: Environment Canada.
43.
Parks Canada. (2000). Batoche National Historic Site of Canada management plan.Ottawa, ON: Environment Canada.
Parks Canada. (2009b). Batoche National Historic Site of Canada Shared Management Board.Ottawa, ON: Environment Canada.
46.
Parks Canada. (2013). Cultural resource management policy.Ottawa, ON: Environment Canada.
47.
Parks Canada. (2015). Batoche National Historic Site of Canada.Draft Management Plan. June 2015. Parks Canada. Website: at: file: ///C: /Users/rhlemeli/Downloads/Batoche_National_Historic_Site_of_Canada_Draft_Management_Plan_2015.pdf
48.
PaymentD. (1983). Batoche, 1870–1910.St. Boniface, MB: Editions du Ble.
49.
PelletierY. Y. J. (2006). The politics of selection: The Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada and the imperial commemoration of Canadian history, 1919–1950.Journal of the Canadian Historical Association, 17 (1), 125–150.
50.
PitcaithleyD. T. (2004). Confronting contentious pasts: The challenges of interpreting “controversial” subjects at America's historic sites.Forum Journal, 18 (3).
51.
PitcaithleyD. T. (2005). The National Park Service and the civil rights movement: Remembering a difficult past.Juniata Voices, 5, 59–65.
52.
PréfontaineD. R. (2011). Gabriel Dumont: Li Chef Michif in images and in words.Saskatoon, SK: Gabriel Dumont Institute.
53.
RedbirdD. (1980). We are Metis: a Metis view of the development of a native Canadian people.Willowdale, ON: Ontario Metis & non Status Indian Association.
54.
ReidJ. (2008). Louis Riel and the creation of modern Canada.Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
RyanC. (2007). The battles of Rangiriri and Batoche: Amnesia and memory. In: RyanC. (Ed.), Battlefield tourism: History, place and interpretation (pp. 87–97). New York, NY: Elsevier.
57.
ShryockA. (2004). Other conscious/self aware: First thoughts on cultural intimacy and mass mediation.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
StaiffR., BushellR., and KennedyP. (2002). Interpretation in national parks: Some critical questions.Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 10 (2): 97–113.
60.
StanleyG. F. G. (1961). The birth of western Canada: A history of the Riel Rebellions.Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
61.
TaylorC. J. (1983). Some early problems of the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada.Canadian Historical Review, 64 (1), 3–24.
62.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.Winnipeg, MB: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.
63.
United Nations. (2008). United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples.New York, NY: United Nations.
64.
UzzellD. L. (1989). The hot interpretation of war and conflict. In D. L. (Ed.), Heritage interpretation, Vol. 1, The natural and built environment (pp. 33–47). London, UK: Bellhaven Press.
65.
UzzellD. L., & BallantyneR. (1998). Heritage that hurts. In: UzzellD. L., & BallantyneR. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in heritage and environmental interpretation: Problems and prospects (pp. 152–171). London, UK: The Stationery Office.
66.
VerishineT. (2014). Public Outreach Education Officer, Parks Canada, Batoche National Historic Site. Personal communication.
67.
WallK. (2011). A sliver of the true fort: imagining Fort Edmonton, 1911–2011.Journal of Heritage Tourism, 6 (2), 109–128.
68.
WinksR. (1994). Sites of shame: Disgraceful episodes of our past should be included in the parks system to present a complete picture of our history.National Parks, 68 (3-4), 22–23.
