The author examines a decade of interpretation research and focuses on the limited amount of qualitative research available, especially ethnographic. This highlights a trend in which there is a substantial absence of work derived from qualitative perspectives and even when studies are considered qualitative they are overwhelmingly geared towards individual visitor outcomes and large-scale studies and surveys. Drawing upon anthropological insights ethnography as both method and substance is explored. An argument is presented that ethnography, in its attention to context, making connections, shared social interactions, and holism is keenly suited to the study of interpretation and perhaps the best way of exploring meaning making, a prominent component of the field. Interpretation research is missing an important cultural analysis of the practice of interpretation, and ethnography offers a unique and invaluable lens by which to study interpretation as a cultural and social act.
AppaduraiA. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
2.
BassoK. H. (1996). Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache.Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
3.
BeckL., & CableT. (2002). Interpretation for the 21st Century. Fifteen Guiding Principles for Interpreting Nature and Culture.Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishing.
4.
BixlerR. D., JamesJ. J., & VadalaC. E. (2011). Environmental socialization incidents with implications for the expanded role of interpretive naturalists in providing natural history experiences.Journal of Interpretation Research, 16 (1).
5.
BrochuL., & MerrimanT. (2002). Redefining interpretation as a core belief for certification of professionals.Journal of Interpretation Research, 7 (1), 11–16.
6.
ChenW. L. J., SelinS., HanhamR., OdellK., & PierskallaC. (2003). The craft and concepts of interpretation: A look at how national park service interpreters reveal and facilitate opportunities for connections. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia UniversityMorgantown.
7.
DecM. (2004). Legacy.Journal of Interpretation Research, 9 (2), 73–76.
8.
FeldSteven (1996). Waterfalls of song: An acoustemology of place resounding in Bosavi, Papua New Guinea. In FeldS., and BassoK. (Eds.), Senses of Place (pp. 137–165). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
9.
GeertzC. (1973). The Interpretation of cultures.New York: Basic Books.
10.
GoldmanT. L., ChenW. J., & LarsenD. L. (2001). Clicking the icon: Exploring the meanings visitors attach to three national capital memorials.Journal of Interpretation Research, 6 (1), 3–30.
11.
HamS. (2004). Interpretation isn't magic: An academic's view on the role of research in teaching interpretation.Journal of Interpretation Research, 9 (1), 65–68.
12.
HamS. H. (1992). Environmental interpretation: A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets.Golden, CO: North American Press.
13.
HunterJ.E. (2009). Researching as if Place Mattered: Towards a Methodology of Emplacement. In Winkle-WagnerR., HunterC.A., and OrtloffJ.D. (Eds.), Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice in Educational Research: Methods at the Margins.New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
14.
KnappD., & BentonG. M. (2004). Elements to successful interpretation: A multiple case study of five national parks.Journal of Interpretation Research, 9 (2), 9–25.
15.
LarsenD. L. (2003). Meaningful interpretation: How to connect hearts and minds to places, objects, and other resources.Eastern National Park Association: National Park Service.
16.
MalinowskiB. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
17.
MillsE. (1920). Adventures of a nature guide and essays of interpretation.Friendship, WI: New Past Press.
18.
MorganM., & WalkerC. (2011). A descriptive study of guided tours at Mammoth Cave National Park.Journal of Interpretation Research, 16 (1).
19.
MorganM. (2009). Interpretation and place attachment: Implications for cognitive map theory.Journal of Interpretation Research, 14 (1), 47–59.
20.
National Association for Interpretation Website.http://www.interpnet.com. Retrieved on April 19, 2009.
21.
SobelD. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communities.Great Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.
22.
SternM. J., PowellR. B., & HockettK. S. (2011). Why do they come? Understanding attendance at ranger-led programs in Great Smoky Mountains National Park.Journal of Interpretation Research, 16 (2).
23.
StewartK. C. (1996). An occupied place. In FeldS., and BassoK. (Eds.), Senses of Place (pp. 137–165). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
24.
StreibelMichael J. (1998). The importance of physical place and lived topographies. In Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.St. Louis, MO, February 18–22, 1998.
25.
TarltonJ. L., & WardC. J. (2006). The effects of thematic interpretation on a child's knowledge of an interpretive program.Journal of Interpretation Research, 11 (1), 7–34.
26.
TildenF. (1977). Interpreting our heritage (3rd ed.). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
27.
TurekE. M. (2006). Form follows function: Interpretive wisdom for environmental educators.Journal of Interpretation Research, 11 (2), 47–51.
28.
Vander StoepG. (2004). Research in interpretation: Researchers’ perspective.Journal of Interpretation Research, 9 (1), 57–60.
29.
WolcottHarry F. (1999). Ethnography: A way of seeing.Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
30.
ZarkiJ. (2004). Interpretation research: A perspective from the field.Journal of Interpretation Research, 9 (1), 73–75.
