The Interpretive Power of Setting: Identifying and Protecting the Interpretive Potential of the Internal and External Setting at Copan Archaeological Park,Honduras
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2008
The Interpretive Power of Setting: Identifying and Protecting the Interpretive Potential of the Internal and External Setting at Copan Archaeological Park,Honduras
This study examined how differing levels of restoration and development within, and intensifying development adjacent to Copan Archeological Park would affect interpretive potential and the visitor experience at this World Heritage Site in Honduras. Surveys and interviews with visitors revealed that Latin Americans, North Americans, and Europeans all show a preference for a mixture of restored ruins and those being reclaimed by nature. Visitors described how this juxtaposition added to their experience. A majority of visitors indicated a strong preference for maintaining agricultural or forested lands between the park and the town of Copán Ruinas and described how the intensification of development would impact their experience. Implications for park management and interpretive planning are discussed and recommendations given. Protecting the interpretive potential of these settings will require interpreters to inform the protected area and local government planning decisions that will ultimately determine the content and quality of programmatic interpretation.
BarborakJ. (2004). Personal interview: Reflections on 25 years of association with Copan.Fort Collins, CO.
2.
BaudezC. F. (1994). Maya sculpture of Copan: The iconography.Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
3.
BergB. L. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4.
BrownP. J., DriverB. L., & McConnellC. (1978). The opportunity spectrum concept and behavioral information in outdoor recreation resource supply inventories: Background and application. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report (RM-55). Fort Collins, CO.
5.
BrochuL. (2005). Interpretive Planning: The 5-M model for successful planning projects.InterpPress: Fort Collins, CO.
6.
BrochuL., & MerrimanT. (2002). Personal Interpretation: Connecting your audience to heritage resources.InterpPress: Fort Collins, CO.
7.
BurdeJ.H., & MayerC.C. (1996). Marketing cultural resources: Visitor expectations, perceptions, and satisfaction.Proceedings of the National Interpreters Workshop, Billings, Montana.297–302.
8.
ClarkR. N., & StankeyG. H. (1979). The recreation opportunity spectrum: A framework for planning, management, and research.Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
9.
DriverB. L. (1975). Elements of outdoor recreation planning.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. School of Natural Resources.
10.
DriverB. L., & BrownP. J. (1975). A socio-psychological definition of recreation demand, with implications for recreation resource planning. In Assessing demand for outdoor recreation. (pp. 62–68). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
11.
FaganB. M. (2003). Archaeology: a brief introduction (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
12.
FashW. (2002). Tourism and the archaeology of state-facing challenges: The case of Copan, Honduras.ReVista: Harvard Review of Latin America, 1.
13.
FashW. L. (2001). Scribes, warriors and kings: The city of Copan and the ancient Maya (Rev. ed.). London; New York: Thames and Hudson.
14.
FeildenB. M., & JokilehtoJ. (1998). Management guidelines for world cultural heritage sites (2nd ed.). Rome: ICCROM.
15.
FloydM. F., & GramannJ. H. (1997). Experience-based setting management: Implications for market segmentation of hunters.Leisure Sciences, 19, 113–127.
16.
FurzeB., De LacyT., & BirckheadJ. (1996). Culture, conservation, and biodiversity: the social dimension of linking local level development and conservation through protected areas.Chichester, NY: John Wiley.
17.
HamS. (2007). Can interpretation really make a difference? Answers to four questions from cognitive and behavioral psychology. In Proceedings, Interpreting World Heritage Conference, March 25–29, Vancouver, Canada, 42–52. Fort Collins, CO: National Association for Interpretation.
18.
HamS. (1992). Environmental interpretation: A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets.Golden, CO: North American Press.
19.
Informe Final del Año 2002 [Final Annual Report]. (2002). Instituto Hondureño de Antropología e Historia. Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
20.
KelleherM. (2004). Images of the Past: Historical authenticity and inauthenticity from Disney to Times Square.CRM: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship, 1 (24), 6–19. U.S. National Park Service.
21.
KnudsonD. M., CableT. T., & BeckL. (2003). Interpretation of cultural and natural resources (2nd ed.). State College, PA: Venture Pub.
22.
LarsenD. L. (2003). Meaningful interpretation.Ft. Washington Pennsylvania: Eastern National Press.
23.
Ley para la Protección del Patrimonio Cultural de la Nación. Decreto 220–97 [Law for the Protection of National Cultural Patrimony]. (1997). La Gaceta (pp. 5–9). Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
24.
LipeW. D. (1984). Value and meaning in cultural resources. In CleereH. (Ed.), Approaches to the archaeological heritage: A comparative study of world cultural resource management systems.New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
ManfredoM. J., VaskeJ. J., & TeelT. L. (2003). The potential for conflict index: A graphic approach to practical significance of human dimensions research.Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8 (3), 219–228.
26.
ManningR. E. (1999). Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction (2nd ed.). Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
27.
MayerC.C., & WallaceG.N. (2007). Appropriate levels of restoration and development at Copan Archaeological Park: Setting attributes affecting the visitor experience.Journal of Ecotourism6 (2), 91–111.
28.
MayerC. C. (2003). Audience analysis report of findings: Copan Archaeological Park. Copán RuinasHonduras: Instituto Hondureño de Antropología e Historia.
29.
McKercherB., & Du CrosH. (2002). Cultural tourism: The partnership between tourism and cultural heritage management.NY: Haworth Hospitality Press.
30.
McQuarrieE. F. (1996). The market research toolbox: A concise guide for beginners.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
31.
MerrimanT., & BrochuL. (2005). Management of interpretive sites: Developing sustainable operations through effective management.InterpPress: Fort Collins.
32.
National Park Service. (2002). National Park Service: Cultural resource management guidelines.Washington, D.C.: NPS Office of Policy.
33.
NeumanW. L. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
34.
PedersenA. (2003). Managing tourism at World Heritage Sites.Paris: United Nations Environment Programme.
35.
SabloffJ. A. (1994). The new archaeology and the ancient Maya.New York: Scientific American Library.
36.
SchlesingerV. (2001). Animals and plants of the ancient Maya: A guide (1st ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
37.
SchreyerR., & DriverB. L. (1989). The benefits of outdoor recreation participation. In Outdoor Recreation Benchmark 1988: Proceedings of the National Outdoor Recreation Forum. Vol. SE-52, (pp. 472–482): USDA Forest Service General Technical Report.
38.
SilbermanN. (2006). ICOMOS-Ename Charter: New principles for interpreting cultural heritage sites.The George Wright Forum, 23 (1), 28–39.
39.
SmithG. S. (2003). The past in contemporary society: Competing agendas.Paper presented at the Archaeology and Globalization: Challenges in Education and Training for the 21st Century, Washington, D.C.
40.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41.
StephensJ. L. (1969). Incidents of travel in Central America, Chiapas and Yucatan.NY: Dover Publications. (Originally published in 1841).
42.
ThompsonM.W. (1981). Ruins: Their preservation and display.London: British Museum Publications.
43.
TildenF. (1977). Interpreting our heritage; principles and practices for visitor services in parks, museums, and historic places.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. (Originally published in 1957).
44.
TildenF. (1968). The fifth essence, an invitation to share in our eternal heritage.Washington, D.C.: The National Park Trust Fund Board.
45.
U.S. Department of the Interior (1997). Visitor experience and resource protection (VERP) framework: A handbook for planners and managers.National Park Service. Denver Service Center.
46.
WallaceG. N., BarborakJ. R., & MacFarlandC. (2005). Land use planning and regulation in and around protected areas: A study of legal frameworks, best practices and capacity building needs in Mexico and Central America.Natureza Conservaçâo, The Brazilian Journal of Nature Conservation.3 (2), 147–167.
47.
WallaceG. N., & SmithM. (1996). A comparison of motivations, preferred management actions, and setting preferences among Costa Ricans, North Americans and European visitors to five protected areas in Costa Rica.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 15 (1).
48.
WallaceG. N., & TrenchK. (1995). A study of rock climbers in Joshua Tree National Park: Implications for the visitor experience and resource protection (VERP) management framework.National Park Service.
49.
WallaceG. N. (1990). The impacts of external development on the economic and aesthetic values of Theodore Roosevelt National Park.Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, NPS Research Center.
50.
WhyteW. F. (1995). Interviewing in field research. In BurgessR. G. (Ed.), Field Research: A sourcebook and field manual (pp. 111–122). London: George Allen & Unwin.
51.
WurzJ. B. (1996). Applying a recreation opportunity spectrum framework in Galapagos National Park: Implications for managers and theorists.Center for Protected Area Management and Training, College of Natural Resources, Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University.
52.
YinR. K. (1998). The abridged version of case study research: Design and method. In BickmanL., & RogD. J. (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 229–259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
