This study used a phenomenological analysis to investigate the recollections of participants (N=36) of an interpretive program at Lowell National Historic Park. These individuals were interviewed six months following the experience. Four topic areas relating to the participants’ long-term memory of the interpretive program were identified: (a) personal connections with the tour, (b) program information retention, (c) positive visitor responses, and (d) ranger attributes. Results indicated that the personal connections made during the program were influential in creating vivid episodic memories. Some of the responses from the participants went beyond episodic information and could be associated with conceptual thinking associated with semantic memory or knowledge. The findings of this study, along with literature associated with long-term memory research, offer a potential model of learning for interpretation related to episodic/semantic memory systems.
AndersonD., & PiscitelliB. (2002). Parental recollections of childhood museum visits.Museum National, 10 (4), 26–27.
2.
AndersonD. (2003). Visitors’ long-term memories of world expositions.Curator, 46 (4), 401–420.
3.
BeckL., & CableT. (1998). Interpretation for the 21st century.Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
4.
BeckmanE. A. (1999). Evaluating visitors’ reactions to interpretation in Australian national parks.Journal of Interpretation Research, 4 (1), 5–21.
5.
ConwayM. A., PerfectT. J., AndersonS. J., GardinerJ. M., & CohenG. M. (1997). Changes in memory awareness during learning: The acquisition of knowledge by psychology undergraduates.Journal of Experimental Psychology126 (4), 393–413.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
DierkingL. D., FalkJ. H., RennieL, AndersonD, & EllenbogenK. (2003). Policy statement of the “informal science education” ad hoc committee.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (2), 108–111.
8.
FalkJ. H., & DierkingL. D. (1997). School field trips: Assessing their long-term impact.Curator, 40 (3), 211–218.
9.
FivushR. (1983). Children's long-term memory for a novel event: An exploratory study.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30 (3), 303–316.
10.
HamS. (1992). Environmental interpretation: A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets.Golden, CO: North American Press.
11.
HerbertD. M., & BurtJ. S. (2001). Memory awareness and schematization: Learning in the university context.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 617–637.
12.
HerbertD. M., & BurtJ. S. (2004). What do students remember? Episodic memory and the development of schematization.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 77–88.
13.
HolbrookA.L., KrosnickJ. A., & BoningerD. S. (2004). Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory, Unpublished Technical Report, Ohio State University.
14.
KnappD. H. (1994). Validating a framework of goals for program development in environmental interpretation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois UniversityCarbondale.
15.
KnappD.H., & BentonG. (2004). Analysis of Interpretive Programs at Selected National Park Service Units - Phase II Research Report: Yellowstone National Park.National Park Service: Washington DC.
16.
KoriatA. (2003). Memory organization of action events and its relationship to memory performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 132 (3), 435–454.
17.
Kormi-NouriR., & NilssonL (2001). The motor component is not crucial. In ZimmerH. D., CohenR. L., GuynnM. J., EngelkampJ., Kormi-nouriR, & FoleyM. A. (eds.), Memory for action (97–111). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18.
MabryL. (2000). An emergent glossary of qualitative research terminology. Unpublished course syllabus, Indiana University.
19.
MadinE. M., & FentonD. M. (2004). Environmental interpretation in the great barrier reef marine park: An assessment of program effectiveness.Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 12 (2), 121–137.
20.
MarkowitschH. J., ReinkemeirM., KesslerJ., KoyuncuA., & HeissW. (2000). Right amygdalar and temporofrontal activation during autobiographic memory retrieval.Behavioral Neurology,12 (2000), 181–190.
21.
McManusP. M. (1993). Memories as indicators of the impact of museum visits.Museum Management and Curatorship, 12, 367–380.
22.
MorganJ. M., AbsherJ., LoudenB., & SutherlandD. (1997). The relative effectiveness of interpretive programs directed by youth and adult naturalists in a national forest.Journal of Interpretation Research, 2 (1), 13–26.
23.
National Park Service (2005). Significant management values of Lowell National Historic Park.Lowell, MA: National Park Service.
24.
PorterA. L., & HowardJ. L. (2002). Warning visitors about the dangers of dingos on fraser island.Journal of Interpretation Research, 7 (2), 51–65.
25.
PoveyK. D., & RiosJ. (2002). Using interpretive animals to deliver affective messages in zoos.Journal of Interpretation Research, 7 (2), 19–29.
26.
RamsdenP. (1997). The context of learning. In MartinF., HounsellD., & EntwistleN. (Eds), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education.Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
27.
RennieL. J., FeherE., DierkingL. D., & FalkJ. H. (2003). Toward an agenda for advancing research on science learning in out-of-school settings.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (2), 112–120.
28.
SembG. B., & EllisJ. A. (1994). Knowledge taught in school: What is remembered?Review of Educational Research, 64, 253–286.
29.
StevensonJ. (1991). The long-term impact of interactive exhibits.International Journal of Science Education, 13 (5), p. 521–531.
30.
TildenF. (1957). Interpreting our heritage.Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
31.
TulvingE. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In TulvingE., and DonaldsonW. (Eds.), Organization of memory (381–403). New York: Academic Press.
32.
TulvingE. (1983). Elements of episodic memoryNew York: Oxford University Press.
