A case study of cruise-based nature tourists in Alaska and the Galapagos Islands is used to examine the theoretical underpinnings of “quality” in nature-based interpretive guiding. Fixed-response and open-ended questionnaire items were used to examine the prominence of eight dimensions of quality drawn from research on effective interpretation. Results indicate that passengers define quality guides as those who are passionate, insightful, enjoyable, relevant, and easy-to-follow. Corroborating these dimensions of quality were passengers’ open-ended statements about the attributes they associate with an ideal interpretive guide. The findings seem consistent with prior research on interpretation and are grounded in behavioral theory.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50: 179–211.
2.
ArmstrongE.K., & WeilerB. (2002). Improving the tourist experience: Evaluation of interpretation components of guided tours in national parks.Gold Coast, Australia: Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism Research.
3.
ArnouldE. J., & PriceL.L. (1993). River magic: extraordinary experience and the extended service encounter.Journal of Consumer Research20(June): 24–45.
4.
BeckL., & CableT. (1998). Interpretation for the 21st century.Champaign, IL, USA: Sagamore Publishing.
5.
BlackR., HamS.H., & WeilerB. (2001). Ecotour guide training in less developed countries: some preliminary research findings.Journal of Sustainable Tourism9 (2): 147–156.
6.
CameronC., & GatewoodJ. (2000). Excursions into the un-remembered past: what people want from visits to historical sites.The Public Historian22 (3): 107–127.
7.
CaseJ. (1992). Talks afloat: mobile interpretive programs for tour boat passengers in Misty Fiords National Monument. In HamS., Environmental interpretation: a practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets.Golden, Colorado, USA: Fulcrum Publishing, pp. 73–75.
8.
CherryC. (1966). On human communication.Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
9.
CohenE. (1985). The tourist guide: the origins, structure and dynamics of a role.Annals of Tourism Research12 (1): 5–29.
10.
CowanN. (2000). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.Behavioral and Brain Sciences24: 87–114.
11.
CraikF.I.M., & LockhartR.S. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior11: 671–684.
12.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1975). Belief attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research.Reading: Addison-Wesley
13.
Forestry Tasmania (1994). Guided nature-based tourism in Tasmania's Forests: trends, constraints and implications.Hobart, Tasmania.
14.
GevaA., & GoldmanA. (1991). Satisfaction measurement in guided tours.Annals of Tourism Research18: 177–185.
15.
GoldmanT.L., ChenW.L.J., & LarsenD.L. (2001). Clicking the icon: exploring the meanings visitors attach to three national capital memorials.Journal of Interpretation Research6 (1): 3–30.
16.
HaigI. (1997). Viewing nature: can the guide make the difference?Brisbane: Unpublished masters thesis, Griffith University.
17.
HamS.H. (2001). The psychology of philanthropic travel and fundraising for local conservation: case study of the Galapagos Conservation Fund.” Presentation to the BEST Summit on Traveler's Philanthropy, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, November 10.
18.
HamS.H. (1992). Environmental Interpretation—A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets.Golden, Colorado: Fulcrum/North American Press.
19.
HamS.H. (1985). Interpretation aboard the North Star: final report to Exploration Holidays and Cruises, Seattle, Washington.
20.
HamS.H. (1983). Cognitive psychology and interpretation: synthesis and application.Journal of Interpretation8 (1): 11–27.
21.
HamS.H., & KrumpeE.E. (1996). Identifying audiences and messages for nonformal environmental education—a theoretical framework for interpreters.Journal of Interpretation Research1 (1): 11–23.
22.
HamS.H., & ShewR.L. (1979). A comparison of visitors’ and interpreters’ assessments of conducted interpretive activities.Journal of Interpretation4 (2): 39–44.
23.
HammittWE. (1981). A theoretical foundation for Tilden's interpretive principles.Journal of Interpretation6 (1): 9–12.
24.
HartleyJ. F. (1994). Case studies in organizational research. In CassellC., & SymonG. (Eds.), Qualitative methods in organizational research.Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
25.
HughesK. (1991). Tourist satisfaction: a guided ‘cultural’ tour in north Queensland.Australian Psychologist26 (3): 166–71.
26.
KothB., FieldD.R., & ClarkR. (1981). Cruise ship passengers to Alaska: implications for onboard interpretation.The Interpreter13 (1): 39–46.
27.
LeeT.W.; MitchellT. R.; & SablynskiC. J. (1999). Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55: 161–187.
28.
LewisW. (1980). Interpreting for park visitors.Philadelphia: Eastern National Park and Monument Association, Eastern Acorn Press.
29.
MillerG.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review63 (2): 81–97.
30.
MorayN. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: affective cues and the influence of instructions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology11 (1): 56–60.
31.
MoscardoG. (1999). Making visitors mindful: principles for creating sustainable visitor experiences through effective communication.Champaign, Illinois: Sagamore Publishing.
32.
NeisserV. (1969). Selective reading: a method for the study of visual attention. Paper presented to the 19th International Congress of Psychology, London.
33.
PettyR., & CacioppoJ.T. (1984). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion.Advances in Consumer Research11: 668–672.
34.
PettyR., McMichaelS., & BrannonL. (1992). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: applications in recreation and tourism. In ManfredoM. (Ed.), Influencing human behavior: theory and applications in recreation, tourism and natural resources management.Champaign: Sagamore Press, 77–101.
35.
RogersT.B., KuiperN.A., & KirkerW.S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology35 (9): 677–688.
36.
SchmidtC. (1979). The guided tour.Urban Life7 (4): 441–467.
37.
SharpeG. (Ed.). (1982). Interpreting the environment.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
38.
SweetingJ., BrunerA., & RosenfeldA. (1999). The green host effect: an integrated approach to sustainable tourism and resort development.Washington, DC: Conservation International.
39.
TildenF. (1957). Interpreting our heritage.Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.
40.
WeilerB. (1999). Assessing the interpretation competencies of ecotour guides.Journal of Interpretation Research4 (1): 80–83.
41.
WeilerB., & DavisD. (1993). An exploratory investigation into the roles of the nature-based tour leader.International Journal of Tourism Management14 (2): 91–98.
42.
WeilerB., & HamS.H. (2001). Tour guides and interpretation. In WeaverD. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of ecotourism.Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 549–563.
43.
WongK., & ApJ. (1999). Tour guides’ perspectives on the professionalism of tour guiding in Hong Kong. Presented to Asia-Pacific Tourism Association Fifth Annual Conference, Tourism 2000, Asia-Pacific's Role in the New Millennium, Hong Kong, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
44.
YinR. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.
