This study used a phenomenological approach to investigate the recollections of participants of an interpretive experience. Four individuals who participated in an interpretive program during July of 1999 were interviewed in the fall of 2000. Six factors relating to the participants’ memory were identified after the interview data was analyzed and cross-examined. The six factors were novelty, personal significance, speaker qualities, activities that occur during learning, prior knowledge/misconceptions, and visual imagery. Three of these themes related to factors affecting what they paid attention to during the interpretive program. These were identified as novelty, personal significance, and speaker qualities. The three other themes developed from the participants’ responses (activities that occur during learning, prior knowledge/misconceptions and visual imagery) were associated with factors that influence the specific ways in which learners store information in long-term memory. The findings of this small sample may not be generalized, but they do have important implications with regard to the impact of recall of an interpretive experience.
AlexanderP. A., & JudyJ. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance.Review of Educational Research58, 375–404.
2.
AlexanderP. A., KulikowichJ. M., & SchulzeS. K. (1994). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest.American Educational Research Journal31, 313–337.
3.
AtkinsonP. B., & MullinsG. W. (1998). Applying social marketing to interpretation.Journal of Interpretation Research, 3 (1), 49–53.
4.
AtkinsonR. C., & ShiffrinR. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In SpenceK. W., & SpenceJ. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory.New York: Academic Press.
5.
AtkinsonR. C., & ShiffrinR. M. (1971). The control of short-term memory.Scientific American2, 82–90.
6.
AusubelD. P., NovakJ. D., & HanesianH. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
7.
BeckL., & CableT. (1998). Interpretation for the 21st century.Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
8.
BeckmannE. A. (1999). Evaluating visitors’ reactions to interpretation in Australian national parks.Journal of Interpretation Research, 4 (1), 5–19.
9.
BishopB. A., & AndersonC. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution.Journal of Research in Science Teaching27, 415–427.
10.
BruckM., CavanaghP., & CeciS. (1991). Fortysomething: Recognizing faces at one's 25th reunion.Memory and Cognition19, 221–228.
11.
ChawlaL. (1998). Research methods to investigate significant life experiences: Review and recommendations.Environmental Education Research4, 383–398.
12.
ClarkJ. M., & PaivioA. (1991). Dual coding theory and education.Educational Psychology Review3, 149–210.
13.
CowanN. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework.New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DoleJ. A., DuffyG. G., RoehlerL. R., & PearsonP. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction.Review of Educational Research61, 239–264.
16.
FalkJ. H., & DierkingL. D. (1997). School field trips: Assessing their long-term impact.Curator, 40 (3), 211–218.
17.
GibsonE., & RaderN. (1979). Attention: The perceiver as performer. In HaleG. A., & LewisM. (Eds.), Attention and cognitive development.New York: Plenum Press.
18.
KnappD. H. (1994). Validating a framework of goals for program development in environmental interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois UniversityCarbondale,1–142.
19.
KnappD. H. (2000). Memorable experiences of a science field trip.School Science and Mathematics100, 65–72.
20.
KoranJ. J., KoranM. L., & EllisJ. (1989). Evaluating the effectiveness of field experiences: 1939–1989.Visitor Behavior, 4 (2), 7–10.
21.
KoranM. L., WillemsP. P., & CampB. D. (2000). Situated cognition: Implications for visitor studies.Journal of Interpretation Research, 5 (2), 5–13.
22.
LevinJ. R., & MayerR. E. (1993). Understanding illustrations in text. In BrittonB. K., WoodwardA., BinkleyM. (Eds.), Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
LisowskiM., & DisingerJ. F. (1988). Environmental education research news.The Environmentalist, 8 (1), 3–6.
24.
LoomisR. J. (1996). How do we know what the visitor knows?: Learning from interpretation.Journal of Interpretation Research, 1 (1), 39–45.
25.
MabryL. (2000). An emergent glossary of qualitative research terminology. Unpublished course syllabus, Indiana University.
26.
MandlerJ. M., & RitcheyG. H. (1977). Long-term memory for pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory3, 386–396.
27.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
OrionN., & HofsteinA. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment.Journal of Research in Science Teaching31, 1097–1119.
29.
OrmrodJ. E. (1999). Human learning.Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
RouetJ. F., FavartM., BrittM. A., & PerfettiC. A. (1997). Studying multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise.Cognition and Instruction15, 85–106.
32.
SadoskiM., GoetzE. T., & FritzJ. B. (1993). Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design.Journal of Educational Psychology85, 291–304.
33.
SchneiderW. (1993). Domain-specific knowledge and memory performance in children.Educational Psychology Review5, 257–273.
34.
SpockM. (2000). When I grow up I'd like to work in a place like this: Museum professionals’ narratives of early interest in museums.Curator43 (1), 19–31.
35.
VossJ. F., & SchaubleL. (1992). Is interest educationally interesting? An interest-related model of learning. In RenningerK. A., HidiS., & KrappA. (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
VurpillotE., & BallW. A. (1979). The concept of identity and children's selective attention. In HaleG. A., and LewisM. (Eds.), Attention and cognitive development.New York: Plenum Press.
37.
WebbR. C. (2000). The nature, role, and measurement of affect.Journal of Interpretation Research, 5 (2), 15–30.
