In visitor studies, there has been some debate about the use of qualitative versus quantitative research methods. Many evaluators understand the advantages and disadvantages of both methods, but deciding on the most appropriate method can still be problematic. This article summarizes the tenets of both qualitative and quantitative methods and provides examples of visitor studies for each. It also reviews several research studies that have successfully used mixed methods to evaluate visitors.
BirjulinA. A., & SaundersC. D. (1998). The integration of qualitative and quantitative research methods in front-end and summative evaluations. Paper presented at the 1998 Visitor Studies Association Conference, Washington, DC.
2.
BrownS. P. (1999). Satisfaction from the visitor perspective. Paper presented at the 1999 Visitor Studies Association Conference, Chicago, IL.
3.
CampbellD.T., & FiskeD.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 56 (2), 81–105.
4.
Davis-GrohuskyK. (2000). The Environmental Learning Center Youth Council: A case study of youth preferences for nature center interpretation. Unpublished thesis, Department of Natural Resources Recreation and Tourism, Colorado State UniversityFort Collins.
5.
EisnerE. W. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril.
6.
FirestoneW. A. (1987). Meaning in method: The rhetoric of quantitative and qualitative research.Educational Researcher, 16 (7), 16–21.
7.
GreeneJ. C., CaracelliV. J., & GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11 (3), 255–274.
8.
McMillanJ. H., & SchumacherS. (1989). Research in education: A conceptual introduction.New York: HarperCollins.
9.
RossmanG.B., & WilsonB.L. (1994). Numbers and words revisited: Being “shamelessly eclectic.” Quality and Quantity, 28, 315–327.
10.
TashakkoriA., & TeddlieC. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches.Applied Social Research Method Series (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
11.
WaltzP. (1999). A visitor evaluation of two Colorado State Park watchable wildlife kiosks. Unpublished thesis, University Department of Natural Resources Recreation and TourismColorado State, Fort Collins.
