Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Amidst the rapid evolution of intelligent technology clusters—including large language models, virtual reality, and educational big data—this paper proposes the imperative to enhance AI literacy among college teachers as a cornerstone of digital competence development. We propose a three-tiered competency framework, named ‘Tool Application → Behavior Transformation → Innovative Design’, to transition educators from technical operators to intelligent instructional designers. Current challenges include outdated perceptions of AI, uneven technical proficiency, inadequate training resources, and limited pedagogical integration. To address these, we construct a multidimensional AI literacy framework spanning five domains: 1) cognitive understanding of AI fundamentals, 2) pedagogical integration through instructional design, 3) discipline-specific applications via industry collaboration, 4) ethical governance, and 5) educational innovation. Implementation strategies emphasize blended training models, tiered skill development, hands-on tool practice, case-based learning, and ethical education. A dual-perspective evaluation system (teacher-student feedback loops) assesses training efficacy and instructional outcomes. The study establishes an innovative dual-core driven platform architecture comprising the Teacher Development Cloud Platform and the Subject-Specific Tool Box, aiming to enhance teaching capabilities and discipline-specific application competencies. The research provides actionable pathways for advancing educators’ AI competencies, supporting digital transformation in higher education, and fostering sustainable ‘AI + Education’ ecosystems. Findings underscore the critical role of structured competency development in bridging technological potential with pedagogical innovation.

Keywords

AI literacy university faculty competence innovative instructional design engineering education transformation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayanwale

M. A.

Adelana

O. P.

Molefi

R. R.

Adeeko

Ishola

A. M.

(2024). Examining Artificial Intelligence literacy among pre-service teachers for future classrooms. Computers and Education Open, 6, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100179

Chen

Morris

Mansour

(2014). Science teachers’ beliefs: Perceptions of efficacy and the nature of scientific knowledge and knowing. In International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 382–398). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108437-31

Chen

Wang

(2024). Empowering education development through AIGC: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(13), 17485–17537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12549-7

Dai

Lin

Liu

Wang

(2024). An embodied, analogical and disruptive approach of AI pedagogyin upper elementary education: An experimental study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13371

Dong

Kim

Pan

(2024). Exploring the integration of iot and generative ai in english language education: smart tools for personalized learning experiences. Journal of Computational Science, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102397

Fan

R. B.

F. Z.

Yan

X. H.

(2025). A parametric and feature-based CAD dataset to support human-computer interaction for advanced 3D shape learning. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 32(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.3233/ICA-240744

Haapala

K. R.

Raoufi

Kim

K. Y.

Orazem

P. F.

Houck

C. S.

Johnson

M. D.

Kremer

G. E. O.

Rickli

J. L.

Sciamma Rella

F. M.

Ward

(2022). Prioritizing actions and outcomes for community-based future manufacturing workforce development and education. Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science, 26(3-4), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.3233/JID-220007

Kim

Kelly

Colón

A. X.

Spence

P. R.

Lin

(2024). Toward thoughtful integration of AI in education: Mitigating uncritical positivity and dependence on ChatGPT via classroom discussions. Communication Education, 73(4), 388–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2024.2399216

Koehler

M. J.

Mishra

Cain

(2025). Beyond TPACK: Envisioning an artificial intelligence technological pedagogical content knowledge (AITPACK) for the age of generative AI. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 41(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2024.2431746

10.

Lepe-Salazar

Cortes-Alvarez

(2023). FORTAGONO: A model for the technological mediation of the teaching and learning processes. IEEE Access, 11, 64294–64323. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3254441

11.

Liu

(2025). The requirements and impacts of teachers’ TPACK competency for AI application in education during the digital era. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 84(1), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.20780

12.

Min

(2024). Instructors’ usage of mobile learning applications in classroom and its impact on the learners’ performance. World Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.22158/wjer.v11n1p48

13.

Mishra

Koehler

M. J.

(2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

14.

T. K.

Leung

J. K. L.

Chu

S. K. W.

Shen

M. Q.

(2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

15.

Ning

Zhang

Zhou

Wijaya

T. T.

(2024). Teachers’ ai-tpack: Exploring the relationship between knowledge elements. Sustainability (2071-1050), 16(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030978

16.

Popham

W. J.

(2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577536

17.

Prioli

J. P. J.

Liu

S. Y.

Shen

Y. F.

Huynh

V. T.

Rickli

J. L.

Yang

H. J.

Kim

S. H.

Kim

K. Y.

(2022). Empirical study for human engagement in collaborative robot programming. Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science, 26(2), 159–181.

18.

Reis

A. C.

Saheb

Moyo

Smith

Sperandei

(2021). The impact of mental health literacy training programs on the mental health literacy of university students: A systematic review. Prevention Science, 23(4), 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01283-y

19.

Tang

Cheng

(2025). Role Transformation of University Teachers in the Era of Educational Digitalization: A Case Study. Education Science, 41(02), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00508-0

20.

Uglev

Meshkov

Kuznetsov

(2024). Methodology of complex visual representation of human activity using cognitive visualization. Journal of Integrated Design & Process Science, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/10920617241289768

21.

Wang

Cheung

A. C. K.

Chai

C. S.

(2024). Language learning development in human-AI interaction: A thematic review of the research landscape. System, 125, 103424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103424

22.

Wing

J. M.

(2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

23.

(2025). Understanding GAI risk awareness among higher vocational education students: An AI literacy perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 30(10), 14273–14304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13312-8

24.

Zhang

Shen

Liu

Wang

Gaevi

(2024). A systematic literature review of empirical research on applying generative artificial intelligence in education. Frontiers of Digital Education, 1(3), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44366-024-0028-5

Transforming Engineering Education Through Enhancing AI Literacy of College Teachers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References