The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety (Panel) assessed the safety of Diatomaceous Earth as used in cosmetic formulations. It is reported to function as an abrasive, absorbent, anticaking agent, bulking agent, and opacifying agent in cosmetic products. The Panel reviewed all relevant data, and concluded that Diatomaceous Earth is safe in cosmetics in the present practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment.
Personal Care Products Council. International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary. Washington, DC: Personal Care Products Council. https://incipedia.personalcarecouncil.org. Accessed 08 09 2021.
2.
BurnettCLBergfeldWFBelsitoDV, et al.Amended Safety Assessment of Synthetically-Manufactured Amorphous Silica and Hydrated Silica as Used in Cosmetics. Washington, DC: Available from the Cosmetic Ingredient Review; 2019. https://www.cir-safety.org/ingredients
GhiazzaMGazzanoEBonelliB, et al.Formation of a vitreous phase at the surface of some commercial Diatomaceous Earth prevents the onset of oxidative stress effects. Chem Res Toxicol. 2009;22(1):136-145.
8.
HanekeKE. Sodium Metasilicate, Anhydrous [6834-92-0], Sodium Metasilicate Pentahydrate [10213-79-3], and Sodium Metasilicate Nonahydrate [13517-24-3]: Review of Toxicological Literature. Research Triangle Park, NC: Integrated Laboratory Systems, Inc.; 2002. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/chem_background/exsumpdf/sodiummetasilicate_508.pdf. Accessed 10 13 2020.
9.
FeiginDS. Misconceptions regarding the pathogenicity of silicas and silicates. J Thorac Imag. 1989;4(1):68-80.
10.
BreeseROYBodycombFM. Diatomite. In: KogelJETrivediNCBarkerJMKrukowskiST, eds. Industrial Minerals & Rocks: Commodities, Markets, and Uses. 7th ed.Littleton, CO: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc.; 2006:433-450.
11.
Seppic. Memo concerning type of Diatomaceous Earth used in cosmetic ingredients. 2021;Unpublished data submitted by the Personal Care Products Council on November 22, 2021.
12.
EllisM. Re: IDPA comments on the draft safety assessment of Diatomaceous Earth as used in cosmetics and other matters. 2021;Unpublished data submittd by the International Diatomite Producers Association on February 22, 2022.
13.
NattrassCHorwellCJDambyDEKermanizadehABrownDMStoneV. The global variability of diatomaceous earth toxicity: a physicochemical and in vitro investigation. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10:23.
WagnerWDFraserDAWrightPGDobrogorskiOJHeS. Experimental evaluation of the threshold limit of cristobalite - calcined diatomaceous earth. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1968;29(3):211-221.
16.
HartGAHesterbergTW. In vitro toxicity of respirable-size particles of diatomaceous earth and crystalline silica compared with asbestos and titanium dioxide. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40(1):29-42.
17.
SeixasNSHeyerNJWelpEAECheckowayH. Quantification of historical dust exposures in the diatomaceous earth industry. Ann Occup Hyg. 1997;41(5):591-604.
18.
Biotechmarine. Diatomaceous Earth product information. 2021;Unpublished data submitted by the Personal Care Products Council on June 25, 2021.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition (CFSAN). Voluntary Cosmetic Registration Program - Frequency of Use of Cosmetic Ingredients. College Park, MD. Obtained under the Freedom of Information Act from CFSAN; requested as “Frequency of Use Data”; 2022. Received January 11, 2022.
21.
Personal Care Products Council. Concentration of use by FDA product category: diatomaceous earth. 2021;Unpublished data submitted by the Personal Care Products Council on December 16, 2021.
BunchTRBondCBuhlKStoneD. Diatomaceous Earth General Fact Sheet. National Pesticide Information Center, Oregon State University Extension Services. https://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/degen.html. Accessed 11 16 2020.
24.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Select Committee on GRAS Substances (SCOGS). Evaluation of the health aspects of certain silicates as food ingredients. 1979. SCOGS-61. Available through National Technical Reports Library: PB301402. Accessed 01 11 2021.
25.
JanicijevicJKrajisnikDCalijaB, et al.Inorganically modified diatomite as a potential prolonged-release drug carrier. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;42:412-420.
26.
DelasoieJZobiF. Natural diatom biosilica as microshuttles in drug delivery systems. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(10):537.
27.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Inactive Ingredient Search for Approved Drug Products. U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2021. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/iig/index.cfm. Accessed 02 19 2021.
28.
DelgarmNZiaeeMMcLaughlinA. Enhanced-efficacy Iranian diatomaceous earth for controlling two stored-product insect pests. J Econ Entomol. 2020;113(1):504-510.
29.
SaeedNFarooqMShakeelMAshrafM. Effectiveness of an improved form of insecticide-based diatomaceous earth against four stored grain pests on different grain commodities. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25(17):17012-17024.
30.
BertkeEM. The effect of ingestion of diatomaceous earth in white rats: a subacute toxicity test. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1964;6:284-291.
31.
PrattPC. Lung dust content and response in guinea pigs inhaling three forms of silica. Arch Environ Health. 1983;38(4):197-204.
32.
EliasZPoirotODaniereMC, et al.Cytotoxic and transforming effects of silica particles with different surface properties in Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells. Toxicol Vitro. 2000;14(5):409-422.
33.
EliasZPoirotOFenoglioI, et al.Surface reactivity, cytotoxic, and morphological transforming effects of diatomaceous earth products in Syrian hamster embryo cells. Toxicol Sci. 2006;91(2):510-520.
34.
EliasZPoirotODaniereMC, et al.Role of iron and surface free radical activity of silica in the induction of morphological transformation of Syrian hamster embryo cells. Ann Occup Hyg. 2002;46(Suppl 1):53-57.
35.
HildingACHildingDALarsonDMAufderheideAC. Biological effects of ingested amosite asbestos, taconite tailings, diatomaceous earth and Lake Superior water in rats. Arch Environ Health. 1981;36(6):298-303.
36.
AdamisZTatraiEHonmaKSixEUngvaryG. In vitro and in vivo tests for determination of the pathogenicity of quartz, diatomaceous earth, mordenite and clinoptilolite. Ann Occup Hyg. 2000;44(1):67-74.
37.
MaedaHFordJWilliamsMGDodsonRF. An ultrastructural study of acute and long-term lung response to commercial diatomaceous earth. J Comp Pathol. 1986;96(3):307-317.
38.
Bioethic. Study summary: study of acute skin tolerance of a cosmetic product after a 48-hour single patch-test (Micro Algues 80 - Diatomaceous Earth). 2002;Unpublished data submitted by the Personal Care Products Council on June 25, 2021.
39.
Palmer Research. Study summary report: determination of the irritation potential of a cosmetic product on human subjects: 24-hour single occlusive patch test (Phycocorail tested at 100%). 2003;Unpublished data submitted by the Personal Care Products Council on June 25, 2021.
40.
Groupe Dermscan. Assessment of the sensitizing potential of a cosmetic product: final clinical security test under dermatological control (product LCA13049-13P379-1 was 10% Phycocorail which contains 9-11% Diatomaceous Earth). 2014;Unpublished data submitted by the Personal Care Products Council on June 25, 2021.
41.
Palmer Research. Evaluation du potentiel phtotoxique apres application et exposition uniques sur 10 volontaires (Phycocorail). (English translation using Google translate provided). 1995;Unpublished data submitted by the Personal Care Products Council on June 25, 2021.
42.
Seppic. HET-CAM test: Phycocorail (contains 57-61% Lithothamnion Calcareum Powder and 8-11% Diatomaceous Earth). 2001;Unpublished data submitted by the Personal Care Products Council on November 30, 2021.
43.
DutraFR. Diatomaceous Earth pneumoconiosis. Arch Environ Health. 1965;11(5):613-619.
44.
CooperWCCralleyLJ. Pneumoconiosis in Diatomite Mining and Processing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare; 1958.
45.
CooperWCJacobsonG. A 21-year radiographic follow-up of workers in the diatomite industry. J Occup Med. 1977;19(8):563-566.
46.
CheckowayHHeyerNJDemersPABreslowNE. Mortality among workers in the diatomaceous earth industry. Br J Ind Med. 1993;50(7):586-597.
47.
CheckowayHHeyerNJSeixasNS, et al.Dose-response associations of silica with nonmalignant respiratory disease and lung cancer mortality in the diatomaceous earth industry. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145(8):680-688.
48.
HughesJMWeillHCheckowayH, et al.Radiographic evidence of silicosis risk in the diatomaceous earth industry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(3):807-814.
49.
HarberPDahlgrenJBunnWLockeyJChaseG. Radiographic and spriometric findings in diatomaceous earth workers. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40(1):22-28.
50.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0552.html. Accessed 10 13 2020.
51.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Silica, Amorphous Including Natural Diatomaceous Earth. United States Department of Labor; 2021. https://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata/613. Accessed 08 23 2022.
