Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

HFO-1234ze(E) is being developed as a next-generation propellant (excipient), with near zero global warming potential, for use in pressurized metered dose inhalers. In accordance with regulatory guidance, an assessment of the carcinogenic potential of HFO-1234ze(E) was required to gain regulatory approval as a new excipient. HFO-1234ze(E) was therefore evaluated in two-year carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats by the inhalation route of administration. Study assessments included in-life observations, organ weights, histopathology, and hematology. Group mean (sex combined) inhaled doses were 2132, 6218, and 21,193 mg/kg/day in mice and 379, 120,8 and 3918 mg/kg/day in rats; in both studies, control animals were exposed to air alone under the same conditions as HFO-1234ze(E)-exposed animals. HFO-1234ze(E) was well tolerated at all doses. There were no HFO-1234ze(E)-related in-life effects and no neoplastic or non-neoplastic findings or effects on hematology in either study. In summary, HFO-1234ze(E) was not carcinogenic in mice or rats. These data support the use of HFO-1234ze(E) as a medical propellant.

Keywords

HFO-1234ze(E)trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene inhaler propellant pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI)carcinogenicity non-clinical

Introduction

Pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) are an important option in the respiratory care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. pMDIs account for 78% of global inhaler use¹ and are listed as essential by the World Health Organization.²

The propellant is a critical component of a pMDI and facilitates the generation of an aerosol cloud, containing one or more active ingredients, which can be inhaled by the patient.³ Due to their ozone-depleting properties, the original chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants were phased out and replaced by the hydrofluoroalkanes, HFA-134a or HFA-227ea.⁴ More recently, environmental legislation, such as the European Union F-gas regulations, has however led to restrictions on the use of some HFAs given concerns relating to their global warming potential (GWP).⁵ As a result, the pharmaceutical industry is actively advancing the development of pMDIs that use propellants with low GWP. One such alternative is the hydrofluoroolefin, HFO-1234ze(E) (trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene), which has a GWP (100-year horizon) of 1.37, representing a significant improvement over both HFA-134a (GWP 1530) and HFA-227ea (GWP 3600).⁶

To gain regulatory approval of a novel medical propellant for use in pMDIs, its safety must first be demonstrated in a series of non-clinical studies. As previously reported, the safety of HFO-1234ze(E) has been demonstrated following assessment in a battery of genetic toxicology, reproductive toxicology, repeat-dose toxicology, and safety pharmacology studies.^7,8 Given that pMDIs are used frequently for long periods, it was necessary to characterize the carcinogenic potential of HFO-1234ze(E) in accordance with appropriate guidance.^9-11 This paper describes the assessment of HFO-1234ze(E) in two-year carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats, by the inhaled route of administration in support of regulatory approval for use as a medical propellant in pMDIs.

Methods

Test Material

HFO-1234ze(E) (trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene; CAS no.: 29118-24-9) was supplied in cylinders at a purity >99.99% by Honeywell (Buffalo, New York, USA). All batches were analyzed by using gas chromatography (GC)/mass spectroscopy (MS).

HFO-1234ze(E) Exposure and Atmosphere Analysis

Animals were exposed to air alone (control) or HFO-1234ze(E), once daily for 1 or 2 h (mice) or 4 h (rats) by nose-only inhalation using a flow-through exposure chamber; surviving animals received the last dose the day before scheduled necropsy. The inhalation exposure system comprised a pressurized gas cylinder containing the test item, a modular flow through, snout-only inhalation exposure chamber (aluminum alloy construction comprising a base unit, 7 animal exposure sections each containing 20 exposure ports, and top section incorporating a central inlet), restraining tubes, and a pre-chamber. A separate chamber was used for each group and housed in a separate extract cabinet to avoid possible cross-contamination. Doses of HFO-1234ze(E) were achieved by varying the HFO-1234ze(E) concentration in the exposure systems while keeping the duration of exposure constant; control animals were exposed to filtered air only. An airflow rate of 60 L/minute was applied for all groups. Separate chambers were used for each treatment group. Animals were rotated across chamber levels on a weekly basis. HFO-1234ze(E) atmosphere concentrations were determined daily; from each chamber, up to 3 samples (20 mL) were collected into syringes fitted with a Luer lock and analyzed by using gas chromatography using a ZB-5, 30 m × 0.32 mm ID, 0.25 mm film thickness analytical column and flame-ionization detection.

Calculation of Estimated Achieved Dose

Dose levels (mg/kg/day) were calculated as follows; a deposition factor was not applied.

Dose (mg / kg / day) = \frac{C (μ g / L) x RMV (L / \min) x D (\min)}{Body weight (Kg) x 1000}

where:

C = HFO-1234ze(E) concentration in air (1 part per million (ppm) = 4.66 µg/L based on a molecular weight of 114 g/mol).

RMV = Respiratory minute volume = 0.608 x body weight (Kg).^0.85212

D = Duration of exposure.

Achieved doses are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.

Table 1.

Achieved HFO-1234ze(E) Exposure Concentrations and Doses in Mice.

Target Concentration (ppm)	Achieved Concentration (ppm)	Estimated Achieved Dose (mg/kg/day)
Target Concentration (ppm)	Achieved Concentration (ppm)	Male	Female	Mean (Sexes Combined)
0	0	0	0	0
5000	5121	2075	2166	2132
15000	14835	6052	6323	6218
50000	50222	20549	21529	21193

Table 2.

Achieved HFO-1234ze(E) Exposure Concentrations and Doses in Rats.

Target Concentration (ppm)	Achieved Concentration (ppm)	Estimated Achieved Dose (mg/kg/day)
Target Concentration (ppm)	Achieved Concentration (ppm)	Male	Female	Mean (Sexes Combined)
0	0	0	0	0
500	471	367	394	379
1500	1503	1168	1264	1208
5000	4879	3786	4097	3918

Animals and Animal Management

Crl:CD1(ICR) mice (5 to 6 weeks old at the start of dosing) and RccHan^TM:WIST rats (6 to 7 weeks old at the start of dosing) were housed in groups of up to 3 (mice) or 5 (rats) of one sex in polycarbonate cages with a stainless steel mesh lids with wood shavings as bedding and provided ad-libitum access to food (Teklad 2014C diet) and water. Study rooms were maintained on a 12-hour light/dark cycle, at a controlled temperature (20 to 24°C) and relative humidity (40 to 70%). Environmental enrichment included plastic shelters, wooden balls/blocks, nestlets, and diamond paper twists (rats and mice) and swings (mice). Animals were acclimated to the exposure conditions once daily for at least 9 days prior to the first treatment day.

Study Design

Studies were conducted in AAALAC-accredited facilities (United Kingdom) in accordance with Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards, current guidelines for the non-clinical safety evaluation of pharmaceuticals, UK Home Office legislation (Animals [Scientific Procedures] Act 1986), and AstraZeneca’s Bioethics Standard. The number of animals used for both studies (69/sex/group for mice and 56/sex/group for rats) were the minimum considered necessary to ensure scientific integrity and regulatory acceptability; throughout, consideration was given to the welfare of individual animals with respect to the number and extent of procedures conducted. Study designs (including amendments) were agreed with the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Carcinogenicity Advisory Committee (CAC).

Dose Selection

Target HFO-1234ze(E) exposure concentrations were 5000, 15,000, or 50,000 ppm for mice (2 h/day) and 500, 1500, or 5000 ppm for rats (4 h/day); all animals were dosed 7 days per week. Concentrations and exposure durations were based on the outcome of 13- and 26-week toxicology studies in mice and rats, respectively, as described previously.⁸ The respective high doses were selected to provide a sufficient exposure margin (on a mg/kg and mg/m² basis) to the highest daily dose of HFO-1234ze(E) expected with any inhaled product. Lower doses provided approximately 3-fold separation across the respective studies.

During the mouse study, the incidence of non-HFO-1234ze(E)-related clinical observations in all groups (including air controls) was higher than expected and considered to be related to the duration of exposure (2 h). To ensure welfare, the study was refined to reduce the daily inhalation period from 2 h (weeks 1 to 49, inclusive) to 1 h (from Week 50). The target concentrations of HFO-1234ze(E) were not changed. Target and achieved concentrations and achieved doses are shown in Table 1 (mice) and Table 2 (rat).

Study Durations

The intended minimum dosing period for both studies was 104 weeks. Study-specific termination criteria were applied.

For mice, criteria included (sexes were considered separately) the following:

• If, at any point, the control group fell to 20 animals, then all animals of that sex were to be euthanized (across all groups).

• Up to Week 99, if survival in any HFO-1234ze(E)-treated group fell to 15 animals, then the remaining animals of that sex were to be euthanized (for the affected group).

• From Week 100, if survival in any HFO-1234ze(E)-treated group fell to 15 animals, all remaining animals of that sex were to be euthanized (across all groups).

For rats, criteria included (sexes were considered separately) the following:

• Up to Week 100, if survival in the control group fell to 15 animals, all remaining animals of that sex were to be euthanized (across all groups).

• Up to Week 100, if survival in any HFO-1234ze(E)-treated group fell to 15 animals, then the remaining animals of that sex were to be euthanized (for the affected group).

• From Week 101, if survival in any group fell to 15 animals, all remaining animals of that sex were to be euthanized (across all groups).

In-Life Assessments

All animals were assessed regularly for clinical observations, including palpation (at least twice daily), body weights (up to twice weekly), and food intake (up to weekly).

Necropsy

All animals terminated at scheduled or unscheduled intervals were euthanized by an overdose of intraperitoneal pentobarbitone sodium followed by exsanguination. For mice, surviving females were necropsied in Week 100 (target 50,000 ppm) or Week 101 (target 0, 5000, or 15,000 ppm) and surviving males in Week 105 (all doses). For rats, surviving animals were necropsied during weeks 105 and 106.

All animals, including those euthanized at unscheduled intervals or which died intercurrently, were subjected to necropsy, full macroscopic examination, and tissues were fixed (including abnormalities) in Davidson’s fluid (eyes) or 10% neutral buffered formalin fixative (other tissues) (Table 3). Bone marrow smears, prepared from animals necropsied at scheduled or unscheduled intervals, were air dried and subsequently fixed in methanol.

Table 3.

Tissue Preservation and Examination.

Abnormalities	Peyer’s patches
Adrenals	Pituitary
Aorta—thoracic	Preputial/clitoral glands
Brain (cerebellum, cerebrum, and midbrain)	Prostate
Cecum	Rectum
Colon	Salivary gland (submandibular, parotid, and sublingual)
Duodenum	Sciatic nerve
Epididymides	Seminal vesicles
Esophagus	Skeletal muscle
Eyes	Skin with the mammary gland (inguinal)
Femur (femorotibial joint)	Spinal cord (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar)
Harderian glands	Spleen
Heart	Sternum
Ileum	Stomach
Jejunum	Testes
Kidneys	Thymus
Larynx	Thyroid with parathyroids
Liver	Tongue
Lungs (major lobes and bronchi)	Trachea
Lymph nodes (mandibular, tracheobronchial, and left axillary)	Ureters
Nasal turbinates	Urinary bladder
Optic nerves	Uterus with cervix
Ovaries (with oviduct)	Vagina
Pancreas

Histopathology and Microscopic Examination

Both carcinogenicity studies were evaluated and peer reviewed by veterinary pathologists experienced in the assessment of toxicologic pathology. Industry standard criteria and guidance were followed for the diagnosis of neoplastic findings.¹³

Tissues for histology were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned (four-to-five-micron thickness), and stained with hematoxylin and eosin prior to examination by using light microscopy. The pathology slides and draft pathology phase report were subject to a peer review by AstraZeneca. Factors contributing to death were recorded for any animals necropsied at unscheduled intervals or which died intercurrently.

Hematology

Blood samples for hematology were collected from surviving animals into tubes containing K₂EDTA anticoagulant. In mice, terminal samples (0.3 mL via cardiac puncture) were collected in Week 100 (females at target 50,000 ppm), Week 101 (females at target 0, 5000, or 15,000 ppm), and Week 105 (males at all doses). For the rat study, samples (0.5 mL via jugular venipuncture) were collected in Week 104. Samples were analyzed for hematocrit, hemoglobin concentration, erythrocyte count, absolute reticulocyte count, mean cell hemoglobin, mean cell hemoglobin concentration, mean cell volume, red cell distribution width, platelet count, and leukocyte count (total and differential) using an ADVIA® Analyzer (Siemens Healthcare, Germany). Blood films (Romanowsky stain) were prepared and examined by using light microscopy in the event of flags from the analyzer.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed for males and females separately using the individual animal as the basic experimental unit, except for food consumption which was analyzed on a cage basis. The following comparisons were performed for each study: Group 1 versus 2, 3, and 4. Tests to compare survival were performed using log-rank and Wilcoxon tests, with a two-sided risk. Tests to compare tumor incidence were performed, with a one-sided risk for increasing incidence with dose. Non-palpable tumors were analyzed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) asymptotic fixed interval-based prevalence and death rate tests.¹⁴ Observable or palpable (superficial as in mammary or skin) tumors were analyzed using the methods previously described for analyzing survival, using the time to death or time of detection of the tumor (in weeks) as a surrogate for the tumor-onset time. Indication of a possible treatment effect was assessed based on rare or common tumor type, in line with the current FDA guidelines.¹⁵ Site or tumor combinations were also statistically analyzed as per current guidance,¹⁶ using the same statistical methods as described for the individual tumors (above).

Results

Mortality

Mouse

Inhalation administration of HFO-1234ze(E) had no effect on mortality (Table 4). Throughout the study, a total of 405 animals (203 males and 202 females) were found dead or euthanized prematurely for welfare reasons. Females exposed to 21,193 mg/kg/day met the criteria for early sacrifice (n = 15) on Day 7 of Week 99 (Day 693) and were euthanized on Day 4 of Week 100 (Day 697). Air control females subsequently met the criteria for early sacrifice (n = 20) on Day 4 of Week 101 (Day 704). All surviving control and HFO-1234ze(E) exposed females were euthanized on Day 5 or 6 of Week 101 (Days 705-706). There were no statistically significant differences in mortality amongst the groups.

Table 4.

Incidence of Mortality and Statistical Analysis of Survival Data in Mice.

	HFO-1234ze(E)
		Males					Females
Mean (sex combined) dose (mg/kg/day)		0	2132	6218	21193		0	2132	6218	21193
Initial group size		69	69	69	69		69	69	69	69
Number of premature deaths^a		48	52	51	52		49	46	53	54
Number of animals surviving to scheduled termination
Week 100		-	-	-	-		-	-	-	15
Week 101		-	-	-	-		20	23	16	-
Week 105		21	17	18	17			-	-	-
% Survival		30	25	26	25		29	33	23	22
	Trend (1, 2, 3, 4)					Trend (1, 2, 3, 4)
Log-rank P-value (v control)	0.9740	N/A	0.4815	0.7940	0.7232	0.3296	N/A	0.7442	0.4743	0.4009
Wilcoxon P-value (v control)	0.4809	N/A	0.5861	0.9551	0.7921	0.6248	N/A	0.6869	0.5704	0.7422

^aAnimals replaced prior to completion of the replacement period (weeks 1 to 4, inclusive) are not included.

N/A, not applicable.

Rat

Inhalation administration of HFO-1234ze(E) had no effect on mortality (Table 5). Throughout the study, a total of 96 (37 males and 59 females) died or were euthanized at unscheduled intervals for welfare reasons. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality amongst the groups.

Table 5.

Incidence of Mortality and Statistical Analysis of Survival Data in Rats.

	HFO-1234ze(E)
		Males					Females
Mean (sex combined) dose (mg/kg/day)		0	379	1208	3918		0	379	1208	3918
Initial group size		56	56	56	56		56	56	56	56
Number of premature deaths		11	11	9	6		14	15	16	14
Number of animals surviving to scheduled termination		45	45	47	50		42	41	40	42
% Survival		80	80	84	89		75	73	71	75
	Trend (1, 2, 3, 4)					Trend (1, 2, 3, 4)
Log-rank P-value (v control)	0.1366	N/A	0.9206	0.3993	0.1676	0.8927	N/A	0.5957	0.5189	0.7237
Wilcoxon P-value (v control)	0.1222	N/A	0.8404	0.3419	0.1483	0.7588	N/A	0.5061	0.4898	0.5968

N/A, not applicable; trend: statistical trend (dose response) analysis.

Anatomic Pathology

Mouse

Factors contributing to death were typical of those commonly seen in Crl:CD1(ICR) mouse carcinogenicity studies and had a similar incidence across control and treated groups. No HFO-1234ze(E)-related macroscopic findings were observed for animals found dead or euthanized prematurely during the treatment period or at scheduled termination. There were no HFO-1234ze(E)-related non-neoplastic or neoplastic microscopic findings after 100-, 101-, or 104 weeks of exposure.

The group distribution of neoplastic (with statistical analysis) lesions in mice is shown in Table 6, and test facility historical control data (HCD) are shown in Table 7. Two tumor types (lung bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and skin squamous cell papilloma) were statistically significant in females at the 5% level (P ≤ 0.05). Low incidences of lung bronchioloalveolar carcinoma occurred in controls (2/69; 2.9%) and animals exposed to HFO-1234ze(E) at 6218 mg/kg/day (1/69; 1.4%) or 21,193 mg/kg/day (4/69; 5.9%). These tumor incidences were within the range of test facility historical control data (HCD) for bronchioloalveolar carcinoma in females (mean 6.4%; range 0-13.3%). As the background incidence exceeded 1%, this tumor type was classified as “common” in accordance with FDA guidance.¹⁵ Although this finding was statistically significant at the 5% level when assessed using a Peto trend test with all terminal and decedent females included in the analysis (P = 0.0248), this P-value did not meet the FDA criteria for significance for common tumors (P ≤ 0.005). None of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. Given the low incidences, presence in controls, and lack of a clear dose response or statistical significance at the 0.5% level for common tumors, all occurrences of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma were considered incidental. Furthermore, incidences of bronchioloalveolar adenomas alone or the combination of bronchioloalveolar adenomas and carcinomas were not statistically significant. Additionally, no dose-related increase in the incidence of bronchioloalveolar hyperplasia was observed. Overall, the weight of evidence supports the conclusion that the lung bronchioloalveolar carcinomas observed in female Crl:CD1(ICR) mice occurred spontaneously and were not related to exposure to HFO-1234ze(E).

Table 6.

Mice: Group Distribution of Neoplastic (With Statistical Analysis) and Selected Non-neoplastic Lesions.

		Males					Females
Mean (sex combined) dose (mg/kg/day)		0	2132	6218	21193		0	2132	6218	21193
Lungs and bronchi (number examined)		69	69	69	69		68	68	69	68
Benign adenoma—bronchioloalveolar		8	6	7	8		2	7	3	6
Malignant carcinoma—bronchioloalveolar		8	8	2	10		2	0	1	4
Hyperplasia—bronchioloalveolar		6	1	6	2		1	2	6	1
Skin and subcutis (number examined)		69	69	69	69		69	69	69	69
Benign papilloma—squamous cell		0	0	0	1		0	0	0	1
Malignant carcinoma—squamous cell		0	0	0	0		0	1	0	0
	Trend (1, 2, 3, 4)					Trend (1, 2, 3, 4)
	Lungs and bronchi—benign adenoma—bronchioloalveolar
Peto P-value (v control)	0.3567	N/A	0.7661	0.6690	0.5723	0.2847	N/A	0.0689	0.4856	0.1786
	Lungs and bronchi—malignant carcinoma—bronchioloalveolar
Peto P-value (v control)	0.2440	N/A	0.4951	0.9948	0.3285	0.0248*	N/A	1.0000	0.8288	0.1889
	Lungs and bronchi—bronchioloalveolar adenoma and carcinoma combined
Peto P-value (v control)	0.2981	N/A	0.4306	0.9294	0.2836	0.0770	N/A	0.2773	0.5789	0.0652
	Skin and subcutis—benign papilloma—squamous cell
Log-rank P-value (v control)	0.0578	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.1803	0.0490*	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.1587
Wilcoxon P-value (v control)	0.0578	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.1803	0.0490*	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.1587
	Skin and subcutis—malignant carcinoma—squamous cell
Log-rank P-value (v control)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.7339	N/A	0.1689	N/A	N/A
Wilcoxon P-value (v control)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.7339	N/A	0.1689	N/A	N/A

N/A, not applicable; * = significant at 5% level.

Table 7.

Test Facility Historical Control Histopathology Data From 104-Week Studies in Female Crl:CD1(ICR) Mice.

Study	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Start (year)	2010	2010	2010	2010	2012	2012	2012	2013	2015	2015	2016	2016	2016	2017	2018	2018
Route	OG	OG	OG	OG	OG	DT	OG	IH	OG	OG	OG	DM	DM	IV	SC	SC
Number of animals	66	60	60	60	60	60	66	65	57	57	60	63	63	60	56	56
	Lungs and bronchi—malignant carcinoma—bronchioalveolar
Number examined	66	60	60	60	60	59	66	65	57	57	60	63	63	60	56	56
Incidence	6	8	4	2	2	3	3	7	2	0	4	4	0	7	6	4
% Incidence	9.1	13.3	6.7	3.3	3.3	5.1	4.5	10.8	3.5	0.0	6.7	6.3	0.0	11.7	10.7	7.3
	Skin and subcutis—benign papilloma—squamous cell
Number examined	66	60	60	60	60	60	66	65	57	57	60	63	63	59	56	56
Incidence	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	0	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
% Incidence	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.7	3.0	0.0	0.0	1.8	1.7	1.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0

Animal supplier for all studies: Charles River, UK.

OG, oral gavage, DT, dietary, IH, inhalation, DM, dermal, IV, intravenous, and SC, subcutaneous.

Squamous cell papilloma was observed in the skin in one male (1/69; 1.4%) and one female (1/69; 1.4%) exposed to HFO-1234ze(E) at 21,193 mg/kg/day. These single incidences were within the range of test facility HCD for this tumor type in males (mean 0.4%; range 0-3%) and females (mean 0.6%; range 0-3%). As the background incidence was <1%, squamous cell papilloma was classified as “rare” as per FDA guidance.¹⁵ When assessed for trend, with all terminal and decedent animals included in the analysis, this finding was statistically significant at the 5% level in females only (P = 0.0490 in both the log-rank test and the Wilcoxon test) but did not meet the FDA criteria for significance for rare tumors (P ≤ 0.025) in either sex. None of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant in males or females. Based on the single incidence and a lack of statistical significance at the 2.5% level for rare tumors, these occurrences of squamous cell papilloma were considered incidental and not related to exposure to HFO-1234ze(E).

Rat

Factors contributing to death were typical of those commonly seen in RccHan™:WIST rat carcinogenicity studies and had a similar low incidence across control and treated groups.

There were no HFO-1234ze(E)-related macroscopic findings.

The group distribution of neoplastic (with statistical analysis) lesions in rats is shown in Table 8, and test facility HCD are shown in Table 9. There were no neoplastic findings that were considered related to treatment with HFO-1234ze(E). Two tumor types had statistically significant results in the dosed groups when evaluated at a P-value of ≤0.05 (mammary gland benign fibroadenoma and pituitary carcinoma).

Table 8.

Rats: Group Distribution of Neoplastic (With Statistical Analysis) and Selected Non-neoplastic Lesions.

		Males					Females
Mean (sex combined) dose (mg/kg/day)		0	379	1208	3918		0	379	1208	3918
Mammary gland (number examined)		56	54	52	52		55	55	56	56
Malignant adenocarcinoma		0	0	1	0		8	3	7	4
Benign adenoma		0	0	0	0		8	3	3	5
Benign fibroadenoma		0	0	0	0		2	7	9	7
Hyperplasia (lobuloalveolar)		1	0	0	0		28	33	20	26
Pituitary gland (number examined)		56	56	54	56		56	56	56	56
Benign adenoma—pars distalis		18	13	16	11		26	21	23	22
Benign adenoma—pars intermedia		0	0	2	1		2	0	0	1
Malignant carcinoma—pars distalis		0	0	0	0		1	0	0	3
Benign pituicytoma		0	0	1	0		0	0	0	0
Malignant carcinoma—pars intermedia		0	0	0	0		1	0	0	0
Hyperplasia—pars distalis (focal and diffuse)		5	6	2	7		6	11	3	6
Heart (number examined)		56	56	56	56		56	56	56	56
Cardiomyopathy – Minimal		40	42	31	34		5	3	6	4
– Slight		1	3	3	2		0	0	0	0
– Moderate		1	0	0	0		0	0	0	0
	Trend (1, 2, 3, 4)					Trend (1, 2, 3, 4)
	Mammary gland—benign fibroadenoma
Log-rank P-value (v control)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.1630	N/A	0.0391*	0.0120*	0.0363*
Wilcoxon P-value (v control)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.0667	N/A	0.1017	0.0198*	0.0287*
	Pituitary gland—malignant carcinoma, pars distalis
Peto P-value (v control)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.0499*	N/A	1.0000	1.0000	0.3029

N/A, not applicable; * = significant at 5% level.

Table 9.

Test Facility Historical Control Histopathology Data From 104-Week Studies in Female Wistar Han Rats.

Study	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
Start (year)	2015	2015	2016	2016	2016	2016	2018	2019	2019	2019	2019
Route	DT	DT	OG	OG	OG	DT	DT	OG	OG	OG	IH
Number of animals	50	52	55	60	60	52	52	56	56	56	60
	Mammary gland—benign fibroadenoma
Number examined	50	52	55	60	60	52	52	56	56	56	60
Incidence	12	10	22	19	13	7	19	12	17	11	10
% Incidence	24.0	19.2	40.0	31.7	21.7	13.5	36.5	21.4	30.4	19.6	16.7
	Pituitary gland—malignant carcinoma, pars distalis
Number examined	50	52	55	60	60	52	52	56	54	56	60
Incidence	1	0	2	0	0	3	1	0	1	5	0
% Incidence	2.0	0.0	3.6	0.0	0.0	5.8	1.9	0.0	1.9	8.9	0.0

Animal supplier for all studies: Envigo, UK, except for Study 1 (Harlan, UK).

OG, oral gavage, DT, dietary, and IH, inhalation.

In females, the incidence of mammary gland fibroadenoma was marginally increased in all HFO-1234ze(E)-groups, but with no evidence of a dose response. For all HFO-1234ze(E)-treated groups, the increased incidence was statistically significant at a P-value of ≤0.05 using a log-rank test, while only animals exposed to an achieved concentration of 1208 and 3918 mg/kg/day demonstrated a statistically significant increase at a P-value of ≤0.05 using a Wilcoxon test. However, the increased incidence noted in all dose groups did not reach a level considered to be statistically significant using FDA guidance (P-value of 0.01). Fibroadenoma is a common tumor in aged Wistar rats including the RccHan™:WIST strain^17,18 and test facility HCD for the RccHan™:WIST strain confirmed this, with a range of 13.5-40%. The incidence of fibroadenoma in the control group (3.6%) suggests that the apparent increase in incidence in treated animals is likely to have resulted from an abnormally low incidence in concurrent controls. Published ranges for mammary fibroadenoma in RccHan™:WIST^18,19 confirm an overall incidence of 28.3%, further supporting the low incidence of fibroadenomas in the concurrent control group. The incidence of fibroadenoma in HFO-1234ze(E)-treated groups (13%, 16%, and 12.5%) all fell within the range of test facility HCD data (13.5-40%), with incidences in HFO-1234ze(E)-treated animals either below or at the low end of the test facility range.

The incidences of mammary gland adenoma and mammary gland adenocarcinoma were reduced in females in all HFO-1234ze(E) groups. In addition, the incidence of all benign mammary tumors or the combination of all benign and malignant mammary tumors was not increased in animals administered HFO-1234ze(E). The incidence of mammary hyperplasia also showed no increase in animals dosed with HFO-1234ze(E). The weight of evidence therefore supports that the marginally apparent increase in the incidence of mammary fibroadenomas in females was incidental and not HFO-1234ze(E)-related.

The incidence of pituitary carcinoma of the pars distalis was marginally increased in females dosed with HFO-1234ze(E) at an achieved concentration of 4879 ppm. Although this was statistically significant using a Peto trend test at a P-value of ≤0.05, this did not reach a level considered to be statistically significant using FDA guidance (P-value of 0.005). The incidence of pituitary carcinoma of the pars distalis in females exposed to an achieved concentration of 3918 mg/kg/day (5.4%) fell within the range of test facility HCD (0-8.9%). Carcinoma of the pars distalis of the pituitary gland in rats arises from adenoma of the pars distalis and cannot be readily distinguished from adenomas based on the nature of the cells or the architectural pattern of the neoplasia. Indeed, the distinction between adenoma and carcinoma of the pituitary gland is usually based on histological evidence of local infiltration into adjacent structures such as the brain.^20,21 However, in accordance with standard practice, the pituitary gland is removed and separated from adjacent tissues at necropsy, which can make the distinction of carcinoma from adenoma more difficult. The development of proliferative lesions within the pars distalis of the pituitary shows a progression from hyperplasia to adenoma and carcinoma,^21,22 and a true test article related effect should be reflected in differences in the incidence of each of these findings in the pars distalis, and not just the presence of carcinoma alone. The incidence of pituitary adenoma of the pars distalis in both sexes was slightly reduced in HFO-1234ze(E)-treated groups; there was no evidence of an HFO-1234ze(E)-related effect in the incidence of focal or diffuse foci of hyperplasia within the pars distalis of either sex. The combined incidence of carcinoma and adenoma of the pars distalis was reduced in all female treated groups. Overall, the weight of evidence supports that the marginal increase in the incidence of pituitary carcinoma of the pars distalis in females was incidental and not HFO-1234ze(E)-related.

There were no HFO-1234ze(E)-related non-neoplastic findings. In subchronic and chronic studies in rats, exposure to very high concentrations of HFO-1234ze(E) was associated with an exacerbation of rodent chronic progressive cardiomyopathy.⁸ The incidence and severity of chronic cardiomyopathy in HFO-1234ze(E)-treated rats in the two-year carcinogenicity study were similar to concurrent controls (Table 8), confirming a lack of progression between the chronic and carcinogenicity studies.

Discussion

HFO-1234ze(E), a next-generation propellant with near zero global warming potential for use in inhaled pMDI drug products, was assessed in two-year carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats. In both studies, there were no HFO-1234ze(E)-related in-life findings and survival at the end of the studies was sufficient to enable an assessment of its carcinogenic potential.

Aged rodents develop a range of spontaneous neoplasms with tumor profiles that are often influenced by strain, breeder, and date of the in-life phase of the study.^18,23-25 It is therefore important to consider strain and test facility specific HCD when evaluating the results of carcinogenicity studies.^26,27 Further, test facility HCD is also used to establish whether a tumor is designated as common (spontaneous incidence >1%) or rare (spontaneous incidence ≤1%) with respect to statistical analysis.^15,28 When analyzing carcinogenicity studies, the statistical methods recommended in the FDA draft guidance for industry¹⁵ are closely followed by statisticians within the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research as well as in pharmaceutical companies and Contract Research Organizations. The FDA guidance was originally developed for submissions that include 2 standard rodent carcinogenicity studies (i.e., the approach used to assess carcinogenicity risk with HFO-1234ze(E)) and recommends that a positive dose-response (or trend) in incidence rates of an individual tumor type be tested at 0.005 or 0.025 significance level and that a pairwise comparison of an increase in incidence rates in a treated group over the control group of the tumor type be tested at 0.01 or 0.05 significance level for a common or a rare tumor type, respectively. Use of these decision rules for individual tumor types results in an overall false-positive rate of approximately 10% in a standard submission containing 2 chronic studies in both sexes of rats and mice.^29,30 A 10% overall false-positive rate has been determined appropriate when analyzing the results of carcinogenicity studies. None of the tumor types in HFO-1234ze(E)-treated mice or rats were statistically significant as per FDA guidance and differences in tumor incidence fell within test facility HCD, confirming they were not HFO-1234ze(E)-related.

An exacerbation of rodent progressive cardiomyopathy (RPCM), a commonly reported background finding in rats,^31,32 was reported in male rats in toxicology studies with HFO-1234ze(E); in a 26-week repeat dose study, a No Observed Effect Level (NOAEL) of 4280 mg/kg/day (5000 ppm) was identified based on the presence of RPCM at the highest dose tested (12,000 mg/kg/day).⁸ The incidence and severity of RPCM in the 104-week rat carcinogenicity study were comparable in control and high-dose (3918 mg/kg/day, 5000 ppm) animals, demonstrating no further exacerbation between 26 weeks and 2 years of treatment at this dose level.

The highest doses tested in the carcinogenicity studies offer very large margins of safety to the range of HFO-1234ze(E) doses expected in patients (Table 10).

Table 10.

HFO-1234ze(E): Summary of Safety Margins From Two-Year Carcinogenicity Studies.

Species (Study)	NOEL or NOAEL	Total Number of Daily Inhalations (Total Dose)^a
		2 × 2 Inhalations (3.91 mg/kg)	8 × 2 Inhalations (7.81 mg/kg)	12 × 2 Inhalations (11.7 mg/kg)
		Margin to Human Dose (times)
Mouse	21,193 mg/kg	5420	2714	1811
Rat	3918 mg/kg	1002	502	335

^aHFO-1234ze(E) emitted dose = 58.6 mg per actuation of the pMDI; human doses calculated based on a body weight of 60 kg.

Conclusion

HFO-1234ze(E) was not carcinogenic in two-year inhalation carcinogenicity studies in mice or rats at doses which significantly exceed those expected in patients. These data support the use of HFO-1234ze(E) as a medical propellant for use in pMDIs.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge colleagues at Honeywell International Inc. and the department of Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences at AstraZeneca for their support in the review of data and discussions throughout the lifecycle of this project.

Author Contributions

Giffen, Paul: Contributed to conception, design, and interpretation; drafted and critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Jacobsen, Matthew: Contributed to conception, design acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; drafted and critically revised manuscript; gave the final approval; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Cartwright, James: Contributed to conception, design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; drafted and critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Hall, Rhiannon: Contributed to design, analysis, and interpretation; critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Waterhouse, Natalie: Contributed to design, analysis, and interpretation; critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Saul, Jim: Contributed to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; drafted and critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Carter, Paul: Contributed to design, analysis, and interpretation;critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Wright, Lindsay: Contributed to conception, design, analysis, and interpretation; critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Aberg, per: Contributed to conception, design, analysis, and interpretation; drafted manuscript; critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Platz, Stefan: Contributed to interpretation; critically revised manuscript; gave final approval; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Regulatory Science Associates (PC) was paid by AstraZeneca for inhalation toxicology consulting services. Labcorp (JS) were paid by AstraZeneca for the conduct of the mouse and rat carcinogenicity studies. PG, MJ, JC, RH, NW, LW, PA, and SP are employees of AstraZeneca and may hold stock.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Paul Giffen

Matthew Jacobsen

References

Bell

Rignall

Khezrian

Usmani

Kocks

JWH

. An assessment of pressurized metered-dose inhaler use in countries in Europe and the rest of the world. In: The International Primary Care Respiratory Group IPCRG 2024 World Conference, Athens, Greece. 9-11 May, 2024. Abstract 24041. https://www.ipcrg.org/24041. Accessed June 2025.

World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines – 23rd List, 2023 . In: The Selection and Use of Essential Medicines 2023: Executive Summary of the Report of the 24th WHO Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines, 24 – 28 April 2023. Web Annex A. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.

Newman

. Principles of metered-dose inhaler design. Respir Care. 2005;50(9):1177-1190.

Leach

. The CFC to HFA transition and its impact on pulmonary drug development. Respir Care. 2005;50(9):1201-1208.

European Union (EU) Regulation no 517/2014 of the European parliament and of the council of 16 April 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases and repealing regulation (EC) no 842/2006. Official Journal of the European Union, L 150/195. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202400573. Accessed 01 August 2025.

Smith

Nicholls

ZRJ

Armour

, et al. The Earth’s energy budget, climate feedbacks, and climate sensitivity supplementary material. In: Masson-Delmotte

Zhai

Pirani

, et al., eds. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/. Accessed June 2025.

Rusch

Tveit

Muijser

Tegelenbosch-Schouten

M-M

Hoffman

. The acute, genetic, developmental and inhalation toxicology of trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234ze). Drug Chem Toxicol. 2013;36:170-180.

Giffen

Kilgour

Jacobsen

Thacker

Holmberg

. The nonclinical assessment of Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (HFO-1234ze(E)), a near zero global warming potential propellant for use in metered dose inhalation products. Int J Toxicol. 2024;43(1):4-18.

ICH S1A: Harmonized Tripartite Guideline . Testing for carcinogenicity of pharmaceuticals. 2022. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/S1A_Guideline.pdf. Accessed 09 June 2025.

10.

ICH S1B(R1): Harmonized Tripartite Guideline . Guideline on the need for carcinogenicity studies of pharmaceuticals. 1995. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/S1A_Guideline.pdf. Accessed 09 June 2025.

11.

FDA guidance for industry: non-Clinical studies for the safety evaluation of pharmaceutical excipients. 2005. https://www.fda.gov/media/72260/download. Accessed 09 June 2025.

12.

Alexander

Collins

Coombs

, et al. Association of Inhalation Toxicologists (AIT) working party recommendation for standard delivered dose calculation and expression in non-clinical aerosol inhalation toxicology studies with pharmaceuticals. Inhal Tox. 2008;20:1179-1189.

13.

Keenan

Baker

Bradley

, et al. International Harmonization of nomenclature and diagnostic criteria (INHAND) progress to date and future plans. Toxicol Pathol. 2015;28(1):51-53.

14.

Peto

Pike

Day

, et al. Guidelines for simple, sensitive significance tests for carcinogenic effects in long-term animal experiments. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum Suppl. 1980; (2 Suppl):311-426. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6935185/

15.

Food and Drug Administration Draft Guidance for Industry FDA Draft Guidance for Industry . Statistical Aspects of the Design, Analysis, and Interpretation of Chronic Rodent Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals. Maryland: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); 2001.

16.

Keenan

Al-Haddawi

Bienvenu

J-G

, et al. Guide for combining primary tumors for statistical analysis in rodent carcinogenicity studies. Toxicol Pathol. 2024;52(1):13-20.

17.

Russo

. Significance of rat mammary tumors for human risk assessment. Toxicol Pathol. 2015;43(2):145-170.

18.

Weber

. Differences in types and incidence of neoplasms in Wistar Han and Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol Pathol. 2017;45(1):64-75.

19.

Historical control data on neoplastic findings in Hsd RccHantm: WIST, Wistar Hannover rats (planned sacrifice after 103 weeks) compiled from 2-year bioassays performed at RCC ltd. https://insights.inotivco.com/hubfs/resources/data-sheets/hcd_tabellen_neo103_kopiervorlage.pdf. Accessed 01 July 2025.

20.

Majka

Solleveld

Barthel

Van Zwieten

. Proliferative lesions of the pituitary in rats. In: Guides for Toxicologic Pathology. Washington, D.C: STP/ARP/AFIP; 1990:1-8.

21.

Brändli-Baiocco

Balme

Bruder

, et al. Nonproliferative and proliferative lesions of the rat and mouse endocrine system. Toxicol Pathol. 2018;31(3 Suppl):1S-95S.

22.

Doi

Kanno

Sato

. Histopathological and immunohistochemical features of proliferative lesions in the pituitary pars distalis of rats. Toxicol Pathol. 2021;34(1):1-9.

23.

Tennekes

Gembardt

Dammann

van Ravenzwaay

. The stability of historical control data for common neoplasms in laboratory rats: adrenal gland (medulla), mammary gland, liver, endocrine pancreas, and pituitary gland. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004;40(1):18-27.

24.

Haseman

Hailey

Morris

. Spontaneous neoplasm incidences in Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice in two-year carcinogenicity studies: a national toxicology program update. Toxicol Pathol. 1998;26:428-441.

25.

Chandra

Frith

. Spontaneous neoplasms in aged CD-1 mice. Toxicol Lett. 1992;61(1):67-74.

26.

Haseman

Huff

Boorman

. Use of historical control data in carcinogenicity studies in rodents. Toxicol Pathol. 1984;12(2):126-135.

27.

Haseman

. Data analysis: statistical analysis and use of historical control data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1995;21(1):52-59.

28.

Lin

Rahman

. Expanded statistical decision rules for interpretations of results of rodent carcinogenicity studies. In: Peace

Chen

Menon

, eds. Biopharmaceutical Applied Statistics Symposium. ICSA Book Series in Statistics. Singapore: Springer; 2018. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7820-0_8

29.

Lin

Rahman

. Overall false positive rates in tests for linear trend in tumor incidence in animal carcinogenicity studies of new drugs. J Biopharm Stat. 1998;8(1):1-15.

30.

Rahman

Lin

. A comparison of false positive rates of peto and poly-3 methods for long-term carcinogenicity data analysis using multiple comparison adjustment method suggested by Lin and Rahman. J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18(5):949-958.

31.

Chanut

Kimbrough

Hailey

, et al. Spontaneous cardiomyopathy in young Sprague-Dawley rats: evaluation of biological and environmental variability. Toxicol Pathol. 2013;41:1126-1136.

32.

Berridge

Mowat

Nagai

, et al. Non-proliferative and proliferative lesions of the cardiovascular system of the rat and mouse. Toxicol Pathol. 2016;29:47S.

Two-Year Inhalation Studies in Mice and Rats With HFO-1234ze(E),a Near Zero Global Warming Potential Propellant for Use in Pressurized Metered Dose Inhalers

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Test Material

HFO-1234ze(E) Exposure and Atmosphere Analysis

Calculation of Estimated Achieved Dose

Animals and Animal Management

Study Design

Dose Selection

Study Durations

In-Life Assessments

Necropsy

Histopathology and Microscopic Examination

Hematology

Statistical Analysis

Results

Mortality

Mouse

Rat

Anatomic Pathology

Mouse

Rat

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References